Politics
Is Expulsion Of Amaechi’s Loyalists Constitutional?
All is truly not well with the Rivers State chapter of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) to which I now refer as “palaver house” given the deepening political crisis rocking the party. The Felix Obuah-led executive of the party with the support of Minister of State for Education, Barr. Nyesom Wike has been doing everything possible to destabilise the Amaechi administration using their contacts at all levels. Of course, the Minister of State for Education had reportedly said that he would make the state ungovernable which elicited reactions from individuals and groups, calling on the police authorities to arrest and prosecute him for “openly threatening the lives of Rivers people , peace and security of the state.”
Political observers are of the view that the primary objective of the Felix Obuah-led executive of the state PDP is to wrest power at all cost from Governor Amaechi. To this effect, it has been fighting dirty since it came on board via an Abuja High Court judgment, thus, heating up the polity. The various courts in the land are replete with litigations arising from the actions of the Felix Obuah-led exco, ranging from suspension to outright expulsion of members of pro-Amaechi group.
A week ago, the Felix Obuah-led exco expelled 18 associates of Governor Amaechi for failing to appear before Osinakachukwu Ideozu-led committee on Performance Evaluation of political office holders, elected and appointed on the platform of PDP in Rivers State. Those expelled include former Deputy National Chairman of the party, Dr Sam Sam-Jaja, Secretary to the State Government (SSG), George Feyii, Chief of Staff, Government House, Tony Okocha and the Adminsitrator of Greater Port Harcourt City Development Authority, Dame Aleruchi Cookey-Gam.
Fourteen commissioners were also expelled, namely, Victor Giadom (Works), Augsutine Wokocha (Power), Worgu Boms (Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice), Joe Poroma (Social Welfare and Rehabilitation), Ezemonye Ezekiel-Amadi (Lands and Survey), Fred Igwe (Sports), Emmaunel Chinda (Agriculture), Joeba West (Women Affairs), Patricia Simon-Hart (Water Resources and Rural Development), Okey Amadi (Energy), Charles Okaye (Chieftaincy Affairs), Nnabuike Imeagwu (Culture and Tourism) and Samuel Eyiba (Local Government).
However, we must pause and take a critical look at the relevant provisions of the PDP constitution for the justification or otherwise of the extreme punitive measure meted out to Governor Amaechi’s associates. Article 21.4 of the PDP constitution states: “The Working Committee at any level of the party may after preliminary hearings, suspend a member from the party for a period not exceeding one month during which period the member so suspended shall not lose his or her right to contest any election but shall be referred to the appropriate disciplinary Committee.”
Article 21.5 states: “Where an allegation is made against a member of the party, the Disciplinary committee shall inform the member in writing of the allegations made against him or her.”
Article 21.6 states: “A member who appears before a Disciplinary Committee shall be given the opportunity to present his or her case orally or in writing either in person or through a counsel of his or her choice and shall be allowed to call witnesses. A decision taken against a member who has not been informed of the charges against him or her or has not been given any opportunity of defending himself or herself shall be null and void.”
Did the Felix Obuah-led exco adhere to the constitutional provisions before wielding the sledge hammer on Governor Amaechi’s associates? Hear Hon Obuah: “The refusal of the 18 affected persons to send in written reports of their steawardship, if they were not chanced to put up appearance, despite the well-published sitting arrangements of the committee is considered as an affront, insubordination and lack of respect for constitutional authority.”
“The committee duly notified all concerned and was willing to accept any written report from such persons where necessary, but did not receive any supervening circumstance that made it impossible for any of them to honour the invitation.
“We had no choice, but to show them the way out of the party, because we cannot continue to operate in this disorderly manner, being a serious and disciplined political party.”
From the fore-going, it is very glaring that the expulsion of the 18 members of the party was not in line with the PDP constitution.
The affected members ought to have been suspended and informed in writing about their offence and also given the opportunity to defend themselves before the party could take further action against them. Again, Obuah explained that the PDP members who did not appear before the committee escaped sanction because they got in touch with the party leadership and the committee, but most importantly, sent in documentation of their performances. But the nine commissioners in Governor Amaechi’s cabinent that were left out had debunked the claim that they participated in the Performance Evaluation exercise. They said that it was a ploy to create disaffection among members of pro-Aamechi group. However, the onus of proof lies with the Felix Obuah-led executive so as to absolve the party of nefarious contrivance to cause confusion in Governor Amaechi’s camp.
More worrisome is the fact that the case between Amaechi and the PDP Performance Evaluation Committee is before a State High Court in Port Harcourt presided over by Justice Silverlyn Iragunuma, prior to the announcement of the purported expulsion. In an interview with a national daily recently, the Counsel to Amaechi and 27 lawmakers in the State Assembly who are loyal to him (Amaechi), Emenike Ebete had explained that the suit before Justice Iragunuma (a vacation court) was the same suit in which the governor, members of the National Assembly and council chairmen were seeking injunction to stop the Performance Evaluation committee from assessing them.
He said that the court had already granted Amaechi the leave sought to serve all processes ofhis ex-parte application on the PDP national secretariat by registered post while that of the State PDP should be served by posting.
If so, there is more to the expulsion which was hurriedly slammed on the 18 associates of Governor Amaechi. According to Chief of Staff, Government House, Chief Tony Okocha, “what they are planning is to use fake delegates for the mini-convention of the PDP that is coming up this weekend. Could that be the reason?
Again, why is the national leadership of the party unperturbed about the crisis in the State PDP. Rivers State is predominantly a PDP State and returned the highest votes for Mr President in 2011 general elections. Is it that the party is ready to forgo over two million votes because some political opponents within the party want to destroy Governor Amaechi for his unwavering commitment to democratic ideals and rule of law? Governor Amaechi is an asset to PDP and deserves every modicum of respect from the party members, including Felix Obuah-led executive. Rather than making inflammatory utterances and taking actions that will impact negatively on the political fortune of the party, Obuah should take advantage of the reconciliatory efforts by the national leadership of the party to restore peace in his “palaver house.”
He said he would not hesitate to activate the recall process against any lawmaker found wanting, if he returns for a second term in office.
He stated this while addressing members of the All Progressives Congress (APC), including those who lost out at the recently held national and state assemblies primaries and have become aggrieved and disrespectful to the party.
While emphasizing the supremacy of the party, he said decisions were taken in the overall interest of the party and the state and must, therefore, be respected by all members.
He warned lawmakers against being insolent and arrogant to their people to the extent of shutting them out after each election cycle, saying such would no longer be condoned.
“So I am appealing to all of you. If you were born with arrogance, please just drop that ticket here”, he said.
The governor hinted that after the next cycle of elections, the process of recalling lawmakers who made themselves “tin gods” would be activated.
“Well, they say they don’t recall people from parliament, but this will be the first time.
“Anybody whom the people say they are tired of will be brought back home. Anybody who goes and forgets his people completely and doesn’t care, thinking that during elections he will come and pretend to be a good man, will be brought back.
“And we are making this very, very clear. We will not fail in what we have said. I am working tirelessly; I don’t sleep. If you are going into office during this period, there will be no sleep for you”, he said.
He advised politicians not to ignore their people who hold the power, insisting: “You cannot overlook them and become so arrogant and pompous that you don’t know your people.”
Gov. Otu also advised members of the ruling APC, who lost at the just-concluded party primaries in the state, not to defect to opposition parties like the Nigerian Democratic Congress (NDC) or the African Democratic Congress (ADC), warning that they would suffer untold hardship and would not make any political headway, if they did.
“There are some kwashiorkor parties that are registering people. Such parties are wasting their time and not even my time. They cannot do anything.
“I don’t want anybody to suffer the fate I suffered. That’s why I’m warning those aggrieved aspirants who lost not to go the way of those parties to avoid unnecessary suffering.
“I don’t want anybody to go that route. It’s an absolute waste of time, energy and people’s future, because at the end of the day, you will drag people into that bottomless pit.
“And when you drag them there and can’t take care of them, you begin to rot, you begin to die. May God give me the energy and power to sustain.”
He appealed to the aggrieved APC members, saying: “There’s nothing that we cannot settle. God’s time is the best. Whatever we’ve done is for the common good of all of us.”
2027: INEC APPEALS JUDGMENT ON ELECTION GUIDELINES
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has appealed the judgment of the Federal High Court in Abuja which nullified aspects of the Commission’s 2027 General Election Guidelines.
The appeal, filed before the Court of Appeal, seeks to overturn the judgment delivered on May 20, 2026, by Justice Muhammed Umar of the Federal High Court, Abuja.
The trial court had nullified the provision in the guidelines directing political parties to submit their membership registers and databases by May 10, 2026, as part of the conditions for participation in the 2027 General Election.
The suit challenging the directive was instituted by the Youth Party, which argued that the Commission’s timeline was inconsistent with provisions of the Electoral Act 2026.
In his ruling, Justice Umar held that INEC could not lawfully shorten the timeline stipulated under Section 29(1) of the Electoral Act 2026 regarding the submission of party membership records and candidates’ particulars.
However, INEC, through its counsel, Chief Alex Izinyon, SAN, filed a notice of appeal dated May 25, 2026, asking the appellate court to set aside the judgment.
The Commission also filed a motion seeking an order staying the execution of the judgment pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.
INEC raised nine grounds of appeal, arguing among others that the trial court failed to determine the jurisdictional issue concerning whether the suit was hypothetical and academic in nature.
The Commission further contended that the respondent lacked the locus standi to institute the suit and urged the Court of Appeal to strike out the case accordingly.
INEC maintained that its actions were in line with its constitutional mandate to ensure the orderly conduct of elections and effective electoral administration ahead of the 2027 General Election.
WHY I ENDORSE TINUBU’S SECOND TERM BID — ADELEKE
Governor Ademola Adeleke of Osun State has explained that his decision to support President Bola Tinubu’s bid for a second term in 2027 was influenced by moral responsibility and the need to sustain developmental progress.
The governor said his endorsement was not based on political calculations alone but on what he considers appropriate in view of the relationship between Osun State and the President, as well as ongoing projects benefiting the region.
The position of the governor was disclosed in a statement issued on Monday by his spokesperson, Mr Olawale Rasheed.
According to the statement, Gov. Adeleke spoke on Sunday after conducting an inspection of the ongoing construction work on the Ibadan–Ile Ife–Ilesa Expressway.
During the visit, the governor reportedly commended President Tinubu for embarking on major infrastructure projects across Osun State and other parts of the South-West.
Gov. Adeleke noted that infrastructure development remains essential to economic growth and improved connectivity among communities.
He acknowledged the significance of road projects currently underway, stressing that such investments are expected to contribute to easier transportation, commercial activities, and broader development outcomes within the region.
The governor also highlighted the importance of leadership support in facilitating projects that have direct effects on residents.
He indicated that recognition should be given where efforts are being made to improve public infrastructure, particularly projects capable of enhancing movement between states and strengthening economic interactions in affected areas.
According to the statement, Gov. Adeleke’s remarks came while assessing the progress of the expressway project, which has continued to attract attention due to its strategic role in linking major cities within the South-West.
The governor reportedly used the opportunity to express appreciation for federal involvement in projects impacting Osun State.
His comments further reflected his view on political and regional ties, especially considering Osun State’s historical connection to President Tinubu.
Gov. Adeleke suggested that such considerations, alongside visible developmental initiatives, shaped his decision to openly support the President’s anticipated re-election effort in 2027.
He said, “I am the governor of the ancestral birthplace of Mr President. How can I have my own in the saddle and think twice before embracing him?”
IPAC specifically said that INEC guidelines cannot supersede constitutional provisions or extant electoral laws.
The Council, which stated these while appraising the judgement of the Federal High Court, stressed that the court judgement specifically addressed exclusionary conditions capable of disenfranchising aspirants and party members during primaries.
This is contained in a statement by the National Publicity Secretary of IPAC, Mr Martins Egbeola, stating that the judgment was a reaffirmation of constitutional supremacy, democratic principles and the rule of law within Nigeria’s electoral process.
IPAC said that even though INEC possesses powers to issue election guidelines, such powers must however, operate strictly within constitutional provisions and electoral laws.
It noted that the court judgment represented a major victory for democracy, political parties and citizens participating in Nigeria’s electoral process.
IPAC also said that the court judgement had restored the constitutional rights of political parties to manage their internal affairs democratically without unlawful interference through administrative directives.
“The judgment would ensure equal opportunities for eligible members to participate in party primaries without discriminatory or exclusionary conditions.
“The INEC Chairman should deepen engagement and consultation with political parties on issues concerning electoral administration and reforms.
“Greater dialogue and collaboration between INEC and political parties would help prevent avoidable disputes and litigation arising from controversial guidelines,” IPAC stated.
Prof. Yilwatda stated this while speaking on a live television interview programme.
According to him, the ruling APC was not focused on fighting opposition parties, claiming that the political battle was currently between the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC).
He said, “In the last three weeks, the APC has not been fighting ADC or NDC. It is NDC versus ADC or ADC versus NDC.
“Actually, I watched with fun all the insults that the ADC is raining on the NDC and the NDC is returning those fireworks on the ADC.
“I watched the videos, and I laughed. The self-implosion is in the opposition rather than in the APC.”
When asked whether he was orchestrating the crisis in the opposition, Prof. Yilwatda denied the allegation but said weakening the opposition was part of politics.
He said, “No, I can’t. But I will be happy if I can do it. That’s my job.
“If you are opposing me, should I be happy? If you oppose me because you are in the opposition, what’s my job? Of course, to stop the opposition.”
The APC chairman also said the ruling party had stronger conflict resolution mechanisms than other political parties.
According to him, the party had committees at national and state levels to resolve internal disputes arising from congresses and other activities.
Speaking on the APC membership register and the votes secured by President Bola Tinubu during the party’s presidential primary, Prof. Yilwatda said the party relied on data from the National Identity Management Commission (NIMC) for its registration process.
“To register as a member of the APC, your name and primary data are sourced from NIMC. That’s the same primary data that is used across the country to open a bank account, get a driver’s licence and secure an international passport.
“So we’re the only political party that sources our primary data from NIMC. This is why people have seen the APC as one of the most politically viable and stable parties. We are a data-driven political party,” he stated.
RIVERS ADC PRIMARY: ASPIRANT REJECTS OUTCOME, ACCUSES AMAECHI OF IMPOSITION
The governorship primary of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) in Rivers State has been thrown into turmoil after aspirant Mr Allen Idaso Ezekiel-Hart rejected the outcome and accused former governor, Mr Rotimi Amaechi of imposing a candidate.
Mr Ezekiel-Hart described the exercise as a “shambolic charade” and said it had produced three separate governorship primary “winners” within the same party.
“Right now, we have three governorship candidates in one party, all thanks to Amaechi’s high-handedness,” he told journalists in Abuja on Monday.
He warned that the situation could plunge the opposition party into crisis ahead of the 2027 elections if the national leadership fails to intervene.
According to him, while the party’s timetable fixed May 23 for the primary, aspirants were informed late Friday that the exercise had been moved forward.
Mr Ezekiel-Hart said he was mobilising supporters across the 23 local government areas when fellow aspirant, Hon. Farah Dagogo, informed him that a parallel process had already been conducted.
He accused the state party chairman, Mr Chukwudi Dimkpa, of inviting only five aspirants loyal to Mr Amaechi while excluding himself and Hon. Dagogo. The arrangement, he alleged, was designed to clear the path for Dr Gabriel Pidomson, whom he described as Mr Amaechi’s preferred candidate.
He further alleged that three aspirants were persuaded to step down for Dr Pidomson in what he described as a disguised consensus arrangement, despite the party’s public stance against consensus.
Mr Ezekiel-Hart claimed Hon. Dagogo later approached him to jointly resist Mr Amaechi’s camp but asked him to publicly congratulate him as the winner.
“He told me to go on air and congratulate him, saying we are from Atiku Abubakar’s political family and should unite. I told him to stop rubbishing Atiku’s name. Atiku will not be part of this nonsense,” he said.
The aspirant said he rejected the offer and subsequently declared himself winner after Hon. Dagogo made a similar announcement.
“As it stands, Farah declared himself winner, Thompson was declared winner by the state exco, and I also declared myself winner. Three winners in one primary that never held. This cannot stand,” he said.
Mr Ezekiel-Hart accused the Rivers ADC leadership of sidelining him despite being the only aspirant who formally notified the party in writing of his intention to contest.
He also faulted Mr Amaechi for allegedly imposing candidates while demanding transparent presidential primary at the national level.
“How can someone who is demanding transparent presidential primaries at the national level turn around and impose a governorship candidate in Rivers?”, he queried.
He urged the ADC National Working Committee to nullify the exercise and either conduct a fresh primary or adopt a lawful consensus arrangement in line with the timetable of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
“The most pragmatic thing now is for the NWC to order a rescheduled primary or quickly adopt a lawful consensus option. Time is running against us,” he said.
Mr Ezekiel-Hart said he would pursue all grievances within the party’s constitution and warned Hon. Dagogo against invoking Atiku’s name to bolster his claim.
“We will exhaust every legal channel within the party. I will not rock the boat unnecessarily, but the party must recognise that I won the primaries,” he said.
