Opinion
Making Breastfeeding Work
World Breastfeeding Week is a week-long event ob-served during the first week of August, every year. It was adopted at the millennium summit in 2000. World Breastfeeding programmes have been held at this said time of the year to highlight the necessity, problems and prospects of breastfeeding. At this occasion, awareness of the health and wellbeing outcomes of breastfeeding and the importance of supporting mothers to breastfeed for as long as they wish are raised.
In the previous years, emphasis had been placed on the importance of breastfeeding, especially when carried out exclusively, to the child, the mother and the society at large.
Today, August 7, 2023, is the climax of the programme for this year’s edition of the World Breastfeeding week. With the slogan/theme; “Let’s make breastfeeding and work, work!” the 2023 World Breastfeeding week focused primarily on informing people on the efficacy of a breast feeding regime not predicated on the risk of the nursing mother’s source of livelihood
It showcased the progress made so far and the key gaps in improving breastfeeding and infant and young child feeding (IYCF), while calling attention to the importance of stepping up actions to protect, promote and support breastfeeding, even at work places.
This has become very imperative because; more than half a billion working women are not given essential maternity protections in national laws, Just 20 per cent of countries require employers to provide employees with paid breaks and facilities for breastfeeding or expressing milk, and fewer than half of infants under six months of age are exclusively breastfed. A global network that aims to protect, promote and support breastfeeding around the world, The World Alliance for Breastfeeding Action (WABA), works in synergy with the World Health Organisation (WHO) and United Nations Childrens Fund for Education (Unicef) to get its aid to the right people in the right communities.
Of course there are many different demands on busy mothers, meaning that women who may want to breastfeed their babies have not always got the support to continue this. Busy working schedules, alongside the many other challenges that modern women face can mean that women do not always feel that breastfeeding their child is something that is an accessible option to them. The 2023 date with breastfeeding has unequivocally stated that women, irrespective of where they work, need paid maternity leave. They should be entitled to at least 18-week maternity leave and a maximum of six months. Even paid time-off for breastfeeding or expressing milk upon returning to work.
What this means is that the acknowledgement of the importance of breast milk to the child via breast feeding, can not be overemphasised and so should no longer be consigned to the exclusive domain of the women to deliberate or decide. Instead, it should be of the collective concern of the society at large for which work places must be serious stakeholders. Finally, this year’s World Breastfeeding Week also stimulated interest among young people of both genders to see the relevance of breastfeeding in today’s changing world.
Breastfeeding, it must be noted, is a natural and low cost way of feeding babies and children – it is affordable for everyone and does not add burdens to family budgets compared to artificial feeding for example, with formula. In promoting gender equality and empowering women, breastfeeding has been found to be a great equaliser, giving every child a fair and best start in life. Most differences in growth between sexes begin as complementary foods are added into the diet and gender preference begins to act on feeding decisions.
Talking about reduction in child mortality, this can be readily achieved by about 13 per cent according to research, with improved breastfeeding practices alone, and 6 per cent with improved complementary feeding.
In addition, about 50-60 per cent of under 5-mortality is linked to malnutrition due to inadequate complementary feeding following poor breastfeeding practices.
Concerning improved maternal health, breastfeeding is associated with decreased maternal postpartum blood loss, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, endometrial cancer and the likelihood of bone loss in post-menopause. Breastfeeding also contributes to contraception and child spacing – reducing, maternal risks for example anaemia of pregnancies too close together.
How about ensuring environmental sustainability? Breastfeeding involves less waste compared to formula production involving the diary, pharmaceutical, plastics and aluminum industries and reduces the use of firewood and fossil fuels in the home.
With breastfeeding, a healthier, viable, non-polluted, non-resource intensive source of nutrition and sustenance is assured.
How Far with The MDGs Today? While we take note of some progress, there is still a lot of “unfinished businesses” that require urgent attention by the government. There is no gain saying the fact that progress in achieving the various MDGs is slow with large disparities between regions.From available data, the last 20 years witnessed a reduction in child mortality by 40 per cent, yet almost 7 million children under five die each year and mainly from preventable diseases.
Under nutrition continues to affect about a quarter of all children globally.
However, the entire idea of breastfeeding can be protected by ensuring that women and their families receive scientifically factual information and support that is independent of vested business interests, for example from baby food industry and/or professionals. Implementing and monitoring the code and WHA resolutions will help protect breastfeeding.
It can also be promoted by informing and raising awareness of the importance of breastfeeding and mobilising people to take action especially during world breastfeeding week.
The idea can also be supported by providing access to information, as skilled clinical help and counselling, and practical and emotional backing to mothers to enable them initiate, manage and sustain breastfeeding wherever they are. Maternity protection can help working mothers continue breastfeeding.
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion4 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
Education1 day agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta1 day ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Rivers1 day ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education1 day agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News1 day agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News1 day ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News4 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
