Nigeria faces a critical crisis as rampant killings undermine our nationhood. The diminishing value of human life has led to a troubling desensitisation, where violence fails to provoke necessary outrage. What was once shocking has now become commonplace, posing a significant threat to our society. Recent statistics play up a grim reality, with over 100 lives lost to violence in various states in just the past few weeks.
In Plateau State, over 62 innocent people were killed by suspected land-grabbers in Bokkos Local Government Area, leaving the community in shock and survivors traumatized. Governor Caleb Muftwang labeled the attacks as “genocide,” showing the grave threat to these communities. Despite visits from top security officials, no suspects have been apprehended, contrasting sharply with responses in other incidents.
Kebbi, Benue, and Sokoto States have not been spared this wave of bloodshed. In Kebbi, Lakurawa terrorists attacked Morai village in Augie LGA, killing at least 13 vigilante members who had dedicated themselves to protecting their community. Meanwhile, in Sokoto, 12 people fell to the bullets of bandits allegedly led by the notorious kingpin Bello Turji during their attack on Lugu town in Isa LGA, reportedly while returning from a Sallah visit to a nearby community. The latest mass killings have claimed nearly 150 lives in Benue, Plateau, and Kwara states. This replicates a similar pattern over the past two decades.
The unfortunate incident in Uromi, Edo State, presents a different dimension to the violence, where about 16 persons traveling for Eid-el-Fitri celebrations were brutally murdered by vigilante members who suspected them of being kidnappers. While vigilantism represents a dangerous tendency born of desperation, it is equally concerning that unlike countless other killings where perpetrators escape justice, authorities swiftly arrested nearly 20 suspects in this case, creating the impression of selective justice based on who the victims are or where they come from.
The differing responses to these incidents demonstrate inconsistency in valuing Nigerian lives. When authorities show uneven dedication to justice, it implies that some lives are prioritised over others, undermining the social contract and harming national unity. The quick arrests after the Uromi incident illustrate that efficient action is possible, prompting questions about the lack of similar efforts in other cases of mass violence.
In many civilised nations, governments implement measures to prevent senseless killings and deliver swift justice. In contrast, Nigeria appears to be encouraging its citizens to accept violence as a normal part of life. This acceptance signifies a troublous neglect of the state’s duty to protect its people, resulting in a rise in vigilantism as citizens seek their own help when they feel abandoned.
The regularity with which Nigerians meet horrendous ends and the speed with which the nation moves on speaks to a profound moral crisis at the heart of our society. That such relentless killings occur in a country not officially at war is both incomprehensible and deeply disturbing. While many nations struggle with sporadic acts of violence, the scale and frequency of Nigeria’s bloodshed set it apart as a particularly discomforting case study in failed security governance, requiring urgent intervention before the situation deteriorates beyond remedy.
Though Boko Haram-type terrorism represents a global challenge that many countries grapple with, Nigeria’s situation is made more terrifying by the homegrown nature of much of its violence. The involvement of both Nigerian citizens and invaders from neighbouring countries, apparently intent on permanent resettlement through violent land grabbing, adds complex dimensions to an already dire security situation that demands comprehensive solutions.
This ugly narrative must change if Nigeria is to survive as a cohesive entity. The government must demonstrate unwavering commitment to protecting every Nigerian life regardless of ethnicity, religion, or region. The perceived prioritisation of foreign invaders and their livestock due to blood relationships between these invaders and some political leaders or security officials will only accelerate the unraveling of our national fabric if allowed to continue unchecked, fostering deeper divisions in an already fragmented society.
Nigerian political leadership must develop the necessary political will and courage to confront these challenges head-on. President Bola Tinubu has a historic opportunity to transform Nigeria’s reputation by placing a premium on human life and ensuring that security agencies fulfil their mandate to protect all citizens equally. Addressing the root causes of violence—whether economic, political, or social—must become a central priority of governance at all levels if sustainable peace is to be achieved.
The disquieting statement by the Director-General of Department of State Services (DSS) that Nigerians should defend themselves against terrorism sparked public outrage. This accentuates a worrisome abdication of duty and deepening distrust in security institutions. Further, it contradicts Lt. Gen. Olufemi Olatubosun Oluyede’s (Acting Chief of Army Staff) promise of justice for the Plateau killings—assurances many view skeptically due to past inaction.
For Nigeria to move forward, justice must be fair and consistent across the country. Every life lost to violence warrants thorough investigation, regardless of the victim’s background. Our nation’s progress hinges on comprehensive security measures that not only address immediate threats but also the root causes of violence, such as economic opportunity, political inclusion, resource equity, and transparent governance. Without these integrated solutions, we risk merely treating symptoms while the underlying issues persist, menacing both individual lives and the nation’s unity and potential.