Editorial
PSC And The Bribe Scandal
The recent bribery scandal involving some officers in the Nigeria Police Force highlights the pervasive corruption within the force. According to an online media publication, some officers claimed that the Police Service Commission (PSC) gave special promotions to junior officers over their senior counterparts after accepting a $10,000 bribe. This revelation once again raises concerns about the transparency and fairness of the promotion process within the force.
Senior officials have requested President Muhammadu Buhari to investigate ongoing promotions. The Police Service Commission, led by Solomon Arase, has constituted a team to look into the bribery allegations. The team comprises members of the commission and the police force. The commission’s spokesperson, Ikechukwu Ani, has denied the bribery allegations.
Unfortunately, this is not the first time the police have been embroiled in a promotion scandal. In 2017, the PSC, led by Mike Okiro, was accused of conducting a promotion campaign that was unilateral and unfair. Many officers were promoted based on their ethnicity and relationships instead of merit. This led to 72 officials protesting to the Acting President at the time, Professor Yemi Osinbajo, as they were denied their rightful promotions.
In 2018, numerous allegations of trade-offs and significant gratifications being collected to secure promotions were made. These allegations involved both senior officials and junior cadres. The former Inspector-General of Police, Mr Ibrahim Idriss, was accused of favouritism, abusing the system, and undermining the PSC by forwarding names of selected officers whom he preferred for promotion.
It was alleged that some people unjustly denied certain qualified officers promotion, while others could receive sped-up elevation through bribery at Louis Edet House and the PSC. This resulted when many officers had been promoted ahead of their coursemates and, sometimes, junior officers had become superiors to their senior colleagues. These allegations against Idriss led to a serious impasse with the Senate.
Alleged malfeasances have plagued the Nigeria Police Force daily. While some officers are diligently carrying out their duties within the confines of the law, others are engaging in illegal activities and tarnishing the already damaged reputation of the law enforcement agency. This situation is a cause for worry and requires urgent attention to restore the trust of the public in the police force.
Police officers manning checkpoints on major roads across the country often behave condescendingly towards road users. They wield loaded firearms, which they use to intimidate drivers. Many of these officers are intoxicated by alcohol or drugs, making their behaviour even more unpredictable and dangerous. Pictures and videos showing officers in uniform misbehaving while intoxicated sometimes emerge on social media.
It is a common sight to witness groups of police officers dressed in shabby clothing cramming themselves into public buses in pursuit of suspects or apprehending them in poorly lit areas without proper identification. Public records indicate police officers, who should prevent criminal activities, have themselves committed every crime listed in the nation’s statute books.
The 2023 general election witnessed police officers facilitating electoral heists, falsification of results, violence, ballot box grabbing, voter intimidation and suppression, all in aid of desperate politicians. Reports indicate the police condoned these atrocities. The PSC must act to erase this ugly image of the police from the minds of Nigerians.
The bribery allegations against Arase’s commission cannot be ignored. He must take action to clean up the system and ensure that his PSC staff are ethical in their work. As the leader, he must set a zero-tolerance policy for any form of bribery or corruption. To achieve this, he has to prioritise the welfare of officers and make them undergo more trainings to bridge the trust gap between the force and the public.
President Buhari must investigate the promotion scandal and ensure fairness and justice for the aggrieved senior police officers. Reckless promotions have plagued the police force for years, tarnishing the image of the country’s democracy. Those found guilty must be punished. The IGP and PSC chairman must refrain from encouraging wrongdoings that could further demean the force.
It is nonelective that promotions in the police force are not based on financial status. We demand that deserving officers are provided with the opportunity to advance in their careers. When hard-working individuals are unjustly denied promotions, it can have a detrimental effect on their mental well-being and contribute to a negative work environment.
Arase’s investigative team must investigate without prejudice. Any officials who feel wronged should offer solid evidence to assist in the investigation. The police must identify those responsible for the misconduct and prosecute them to serve as a deterrent to others. A joint investigation should be instituted since both officials of the commission and the police were fingered in the allegation.
The PSC chieftain needs to improve the coordination and services of the commission and the police. He should address not only corruption, but the recurring issues or conflicts of roles between the IGP and the commission. As a new chairman, distractions cannot be afforded. Arase should advocate for marginalised police officers nationwide. Demanding a list of promotions will reveal any predilection within the service.
Editorial
Making Rivers’ Seaports Work
When Rivers State Governor, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, received the Board and Management of the Nigerian Ports Authority (NPA), led by its Chairman, Senator Adeyeye Adedayo Clement, his message was unmistakable: Rivers’ seaports remain underutilised, and Nigeria is poorer for it. The governor’s lament was a sad reminder of how neglect and centralisation continue to choke the nation’s economic arteries.
The governor, in his remarks at Government House, Port Harcourt, expressed concern that the twin seaports — the NPA in Port Harcourt and the Onne Seaport — have not been operating at their full potential. He underscored that seaports are vital engines of national development, pointing out that no prosperous nation thrives without efficient ports and airports. His position aligns with global realities that maritime trade remains the backbone of industrial expansion and international commerce.
Indeed, the case of Rivers State is peculiar. It hosts two major ports strategically located along the Bonny River axis, yet cargo throughput has remained dismally low compared to Lagos. According to NPA’s 2023 statistics, Lagos ports (Apapa and Tin Can Island) handled over 75 per cent of Nigeria’s container traffic, while Onne managed less than 10 per cent. Such a lopsided distribution is neither efficient nor sustainable.
Governor Fubara rightly observed that the full capacity operation of Onne Port would be transformative. The area’s vast land mass and industrial potential make it ideal for ancillary businesses — warehousing, logistics, ship repair, and manufacturing. A revitalised Onne would attract investors, create jobs, and stimulate economic growth, not only in Rivers State but across the Niger Delta.
The multiplier effect cannot be overstated. The port’s expansion would boost clearing and forwarding services, strengthen local transport networks, and revitalise the moribund manufacturing sector. It would also expand opportunities for youth employment — a pressing concern in a state where unemployment reportedly hovers around 32 per cent, according to the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS).
Yet, the challenge lies not in capacity but in policy. For years, Nigeria’s maritime economy has been suffocated by excessive centralisation. Successive governments have prioritised Lagos at the expense of other viable ports, creating a traffic nightmare and logistical bottlenecks that cost importers and exporters billions annually. The governor’s call, therefore, is a plea for fairness and pragmatism.
Making Lagos the exclusive maritime gateway is counter productive. Congestion at Tin Can Island and Apapa has become legendary — ships often wait weeks to berth, while truck queues stretch for kilometres. The result is avoidable demurrage, product delays, and business frustration. A more decentralised port system would spread economic opportunities and reduce the burden on Lagos’ overstretched infrastructure.
Importers continue to face severe difficulties clearing goods in Lagos, with bureaucratic delays and poor road networks compounding their woes. The World Bank’s Doing Business Report estimates that Nigerian ports experience average clearance times of 20 days — compared to just 5 days in neighbouring Ghana. Such inefficiency undermines competitiveness and discourages foreign investment.
Worse still, goods transported from Lagos to other regions are often lost to accidents or criminal attacks along the nation’s perilous highways. Reports from the Federal Road Safety Corps indicate that over 5,000 road crashes involving heavy-duty trucks occurred in 2023, many en route from Lagos. By contrast, activating seaports in Rivers, Warri, and Calabar would shorten cargo routes and save lives.
The economic rationale is clear: making all seaports operational will create jobs, enhance trade efficiency, and boost national revenue. It will also help diversify economic activity away from the overburdened South West, spreading prosperity more evenly across the federation.
Decentralisation is both an economic strategy and an act of national renewal. When Onne, Warri, and Calabar ports operate optimally, hinterland states benefit through increased trade and infrastructure development. The federal purse, too, gains through taxes, duties, and improved productivity.
Tin Can Island, already bursting at the seams, exemplifies the perils of over-centralisation. Ships face berthing delays, containers stack up, and port users lose valuable hours navigating chaos. The result is higher operational costs and lower competitiveness. Allowing states like Rivers to fully harness their maritime assets would reverse this trend.
Compelling all importers to use Lagos ports is an anachronistic policy that stifles innovation and local enterprise. Nigeria cannot achieve its industrial ambitions by chaining its logistics system to one congested city. The path to prosperity lies in empowering every state to develop and utilise its natural advantages — and for Rivers, that means functional seaports.
Fubara’s call should not go unheeded. The Federal Government must embrace decentralisation as a strategic necessity for national growth. Making Rivers’ seaports work is not just about reviving dormant infrastructure; it is about unlocking the full maritime potential of a nation yearning for balance, productivity, and shared prosperity.
Editorial
Addressing The State Of Roads In PH
Editorial
Charge Before New Rivers Council Helmsmen
-
Rivers5 days agoIAUE Governing Council Chair Assures On Mandate Delivery
-
Featured5 days agoFubara Tasks New SSG On Honour, Service, Protection Of Rivers Interest
-
Opinion5 days ago
Dangers Of Unchecked Growth, Ambition
-
Editorial5 days agoMaking Rivers’ Seaports Work
-
News5 days agoRSG Cancels ?134BN Secretariat Contract, Orders Refund Of ?20BN Mobilisation … Revalidates Four Projects
-
Opinion5 days ago
Betrayal: Vice Of Indelible Scar
-
News5 days agoNLC Faults FG’s “No Work, No Pay” Policy
-
News5 days ago
Group Harps On Empowerment Of Girl Child
