Editorial
PSC And The Bribe Scandal
The recent bribery scandal involving some officers in the Nigeria Police Force highlights the pervasive corruption within the force. According to an online media publication, some officers claimed that the Police Service Commission (PSC) gave special promotions to junior officers over their senior counterparts after accepting a $10,000 bribe. This revelation once again raises concerns about the transparency and fairness of the promotion process within the force.
Senior officials have requested President Muhammadu Buhari to investigate ongoing promotions. The Police Service Commission, led by Solomon Arase, has constituted a team to look into the bribery allegations. The team comprises members of the commission and the police force. The commission’s spokesperson, Ikechukwu Ani, has denied the bribery allegations.
Unfortunately, this is not the first time the police have been embroiled in a promotion scandal. In 2017, the PSC, led by Mike Okiro, was accused of conducting a promotion campaign that was unilateral and unfair. Many officers were promoted based on their ethnicity and relationships instead of merit. This led to 72 officials protesting to the Acting President at the time, Professor Yemi Osinbajo, as they were denied their rightful promotions.
In 2018, numerous allegations of trade-offs and significant gratifications being collected to secure promotions were made. These allegations involved both senior officials and junior cadres. The former Inspector-General of Police, Mr Ibrahim Idriss, was accused of favouritism, abusing the system, and undermining the PSC by forwarding names of selected officers whom he preferred for promotion.
It was alleged that some people unjustly denied certain qualified officers promotion, while others could receive sped-up elevation through bribery at Louis Edet House and the PSC. This resulted when many officers had been promoted ahead of their coursemates and, sometimes, junior officers had become superiors to their senior colleagues. These allegations against Idriss led to a serious impasse with the Senate.
Alleged malfeasances have plagued the Nigeria Police Force daily. While some officers are diligently carrying out their duties within the confines of the law, others are engaging in illegal activities and tarnishing the already damaged reputation of the law enforcement agency. This situation is a cause for worry and requires urgent attention to restore the trust of the public in the police force.
Police officers manning checkpoints on major roads across the country often behave condescendingly towards road users. They wield loaded firearms, which they use to intimidate drivers. Many of these officers are intoxicated by alcohol or drugs, making their behaviour even more unpredictable and dangerous. Pictures and videos showing officers in uniform misbehaving while intoxicated sometimes emerge on social media.
It is a common sight to witness groups of police officers dressed in shabby clothing cramming themselves into public buses in pursuit of suspects or apprehending them in poorly lit areas without proper identification. Public records indicate police officers, who should prevent criminal activities, have themselves committed every crime listed in the nation’s statute books.
The 2023 general election witnessed police officers facilitating electoral heists, falsification of results, violence, ballot box grabbing, voter intimidation and suppression, all in aid of desperate politicians. Reports indicate the police condoned these atrocities. The PSC must act to erase this ugly image of the police from the minds of Nigerians.
The bribery allegations against Arase’s commission cannot be ignored. He must take action to clean up the system and ensure that his PSC staff are ethical in their work. As the leader, he must set a zero-tolerance policy for any form of bribery or corruption. To achieve this, he has to prioritise the welfare of officers and make them undergo more trainings to bridge the trust gap between the force and the public.
President Buhari must investigate the promotion scandal and ensure fairness and justice for the aggrieved senior police officers. Reckless promotions have plagued the police force for years, tarnishing the image of the country’s democracy. Those found guilty must be punished. The IGP and PSC chairman must refrain from encouraging wrongdoings that could further demean the force.
It is nonelective that promotions in the police force are not based on financial status. We demand that deserving officers are provided with the opportunity to advance in their careers. When hard-working individuals are unjustly denied promotions, it can have a detrimental effect on their mental well-being and contribute to a negative work environment.
Arase’s investigative team must investigate without prejudice. Any officials who feel wronged should offer solid evidence to assist in the investigation. The police must identify those responsible for the misconduct and prosecute them to serve as a deterrent to others. A joint investigation should be instituted since both officials of the commission and the police were fingered in the allegation.
The PSC chieftain needs to improve the coordination and services of the commission and the police. He should address not only corruption, but the recurring issues or conflicts of roles between the IGP and the commission. As a new chairman, distractions cannot be afforded. Arase should advocate for marginalised police officers nationwide. Demanding a list of promotions will reveal any predilection within the service.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics2 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics2 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics2 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
Rivers5 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News2 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
News5 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics5 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured5 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
