Connect with us

Opinion

 Towards Curbing Girl-Child Challenges

Published

on

There is more to parenting than just providing the physiological needs of the Girl-Child.
The penultimate Tuesday, October 11, was the day the global community marked the Day of the Girl-Child. It was a time to reflect on the values, prospects, opportunities, challenges and the roles of Government, the family, churches, and other institutions of socialisation in protecting the rights and dignity of the Girl-Child.
Women organisations, Civil Society groups, Christian women groups, including the National Association of Women Journalists (NAWOJ), and International Federation of Female Lawyers (FIDA), used the event to harp on the need to protect and give the Girl-Child all the opportunities she deserved. It is pertinent to state that the Girl-Child is endangered. This reality makes it mandatory for parents, the Federal, State, Local Governments and   all caregivers to reflect on their roles in protecting the Girl-Child. To say the Girl-Child needs to be protected and saved from evil people and callous parents is to say the least. The New Age and Traditional media are replete with ugly scenes and reports of heartless abuses of this fragile group of humans.
No day passes without one assault or social vices meted on the Girl-child from Godless men. Sadly, abuses the Girl-child  incur come from some neighbours, blood relations, even church members in sheep clothing. The Girl Child is no doubt, the most vulnerable of the activities of evil men in society. Girls are now the target of ritualists now on prowl, extracting sensitive organs to achieve their mischievous and inordinate ambition. The female sex, because of her emotion-driven disposition gives in to lies and  is deceived so easily. We must collectively work to protect the Girl child from abuses at all fronts. The safety or security consciousness must be cultivated by the Girl-Child first. Girls should constantly remind themselves that there is tendency in wicked man to abuse her. Even when we depend on God for safety and security, we must do what we should and God will do what we cannot do for ourselves. The grace of security and safety God gives does not cover licentious, obscene and frivolous lifestyles.  Sometimes, what the Girl Child wears is enough to attract assault from a morally debased man. While dressing is cultural, thus relative and not an absolute, it behoves all girls and women to know that decency and modesty in dressing is an expression of godliness. Civilisation and Globalisation that show utter disregard or disrespect for morality or values is bestiality.  Covering our sensitive or private part is a way to attract dignity.
Covering is of essence in dressing. The Girl Child should be taught to dress properly, not to expose their sensitive parts to the public. When I see some girls in the streets in sloven and skimpy clothes that show areas that should be covered, I wonder where our society is heading to. It reveals the level of moral decadence and gross disregard for moral values. What is more disturbing is the fact that most girls who dress in shameless manner are dependants. And they wear such inglorious clothes from home under the watch of their parents who are supposed to censor what their Girl-Child wears.  Parents should teach their daughters how they should dress. However, this will not be possible or effective if parents don’t live out moral values. If a female  parent does not dress well she does not have the clout or boldness to tell the Girl-Child not to dress seductively because she is a bad example for the Girl-Child. Parents should show good example in dressing also for the younger ones to model.  A foremost world Evangelist and Missionary, Dwight L. Moody said for parents to train up their child in the way they should go, the parents “must be in the way themselves”. This is a truism because it is said that when the mother sheep shews its cud the young ones are watching. It is not what we say that matters but living out what we say.
If what we tell the child is not substantiated by practical life expression, it will be an exercise in futility and counter-productive. It is high time mothers who are at the frontline of the family socialisation responsibility, lived above board and seek to make positive impact on the Girl-child.  There is more to parenting than just providing the physiological needs of the Girl-Child. Modelling and inculcating descent dressing  in the Girl-Child should be seen as an integral and inextricable part of parenting. Feminine groups advocating for the protection and respect for the Girl-Child should also teach their members to dress decently. Campaigns for the welfare of the Girl-Child should not be media hype but practical and persuasive through exemplary appearance and dressing. Women who are married should have regard and respect for the sanctity of marriage and dress properly. Remember, the eye is the window of the soul. What the eye of a person sees it transmits to the mind which processes it saves it in the subconscious and it props up at will sometimes, involuntarily. It takes a God fearing person or rugged moralist to resist the seduction of a woman to sexual immorality. The appearance of some married women and girls presupposes a seduction and  immorality. This also lends support to the fact that people who are suppose to be care givers are failing in their responsibility. The family is the basic unit of society.  Families that do not have regard for value system will inevitably produce bad society because the family remains the primary agent of socialisation where children are taught cultural and moral values.
As we have  marked  the International Day of the Girl-Child, let parents put their feet down to ensure their daughters appear presentable before God and before level-headed men. The Girl-Child should be taught how to respect herself, that respect is earned and should resist every attempt to make them compromise their virginity. Parents should discourage the Girl-Child’s intimate relationship with bad and queer family members. Girl-Child should not be engaged in precarious and tempting economic activities, like hawking. Parents should not create a platform where the Girl Child becomes a money spinner or awkward income generator. Early and forced marriage should be discouraged even as such act violates the right and dignity of the Girl-Child. The church should not treat with levity the issues of sex perversion, especially involving the Girl-Child. Abuse of the Girl-Child should be considered as a grave offence. It is unfortunate that some Pastors have failed to be vanguard of moral values through their nonchalant and laissez-faire attitude to cases of flagrant immorality in their congregation. They should teach women how to dress and enforce a dress code for them. It beats my imagination seeing some women dress to church as though they were going to a social function or club. School administrators at the primary, secondary and tertiary levels should frown at and punish proven cases of abuse of the Girl-Child. Female students who dress indecently or in a seductive manner to lectures or in the campus should be sent home. We should be reminded that where our rights end that is where the right of another begins. Women should not abuse ‘Freedom”.   Men who violate  the Girl-Child should be made to face the full wrath of the law, when tried and found guilty by court of competent jurisdiction to deter others.

By: Igbiki Benibo

Continue Reading

Opinion

Trans-Kalabari  Road:  Work In Progress 

Published

on

Quote:”This Dream project  is one of  the best things that have happened  to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas in recent times.”
This is the concluding part of this story featured in our last edition.
Good road network helps farmers to convey their agro-allied products to  commercial hubs where buyers and sellers meet periodically to transact business. Road network engineers and motivates people resident in unfriendly geographical terrains, like riverine areas,  to own property and shuttle home with ease. Some people will prefer living in their own houses in a more serene and nature-blessed communities to living in the city that is fraught with  pollution, and other environmental, social and economic hazards. Prior to the cult epidemic that ravaged parts of Rivers State, the Emohuas, Elemes, Ogonis, and Etches were known for rural dwelling. Most public servants from these areas do their official and private transactions from  their villages. For them it was comparatively easier to live in the village and engage in a diversified economic endeavours through farming, fishing or other lucrative business without outrageous charges and embarrassment associated with doing business in Port Harcourt, where land is as scarce as the traditional needle.
That is why the decision to construct the Trans-Kalabari Road by the administration of Dr. Peter Odili was one of the best decisions that administration took. When Dr. Odili vacated office as the Rivers State Governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi took over and awarded contracts for continuation of the road project which in my considered view is the felt need of  the people of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. Unfortunately, Rt. Hon. Amaechi’s efforts to drive the project was sabotaged by some contractors some of whom are Kalabari people. The main  Trans-Kalabari Road is one project that is dear to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas of Rivers State. This is because through the road commuters can easily access several communities in the three local government areas. For instance, the road when completed will enable access to eight of the ten communities in Degema Local Government Area,  namely: Bukuma, Tombia,  Bakana, Oguruama, Obuama, Usokun, Degema town  and the Degema Consulate. It will also link 15 of the 16 communities in Asari Toru Local Government Area. The communities are: Buguma, the local government headquarters, Ido, Abalama, Tema, Sama, Okpo, Ilelema, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama, Krakrama, Omekwe-Ama, Angulama. The road will also connect  14  of 17 wards in Akuku Toru Local Government Area, and other settlements. It is interesting to note that It is faster,  and far more convenient and economical for the catchment Communities on the Trans-Kalabari Road network to go to the State Capital than the East West Road.  The people of the three local government areas will prefer  to work or do their transactions in Port Harcourt from their respective communities to staying in Port Harcourt where the house rent and the general cost of living is astronomically high.
 Consequently, development will seamlessly spread to the 28 out of 34 communities of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. The only Communities that are not linked by the road project are Oporoama in Asari Toru,  the Ke and  Bille Communities in Degema Local Government Area and the “Oceania” communities of Abissa, Kula, Soku, Idama, Elem Sangama of Akuku Toru Local Government Area. But because of the economic value of the unlinked Communities to Nigeria, (they produce substantial oil and gas in the area), the Federal, State Governments and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), can extend the road network to those areas just as Bonny is linked to Port Harcourt and the Lagos Mainland Bridge is connecting several towns in Lagos and neighbouring States.Kudos to previous administrations who  had constructed the Central Group axis.
 However, what is said to be the First Phase of the Trans-Kalabari Road project is actually a linkage of the “Central Group” Communities which consists of Krakrama, Angulama, Omekwe. Ama, Omekwe Tari Ama, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama. It is the peripheral of the Trans-Kalabari Road. The completion of the  Main Trans Kalabari project will free Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor areas from congestion. It will motivate residents and people of the three local areas to contribute to the development of their Communities. If the Ogonis, Etches, Emohuas, Oyigbos, Okrikas, Elemes can feel comfortable doing business in Port Harcourt from home, residents and people whose communities are linked to Port Harcourt through the Trans-Kalabari Road will no doubt, do likewise. The vast arable virgin land of the Bukuma people can be open for development and sustainable agricultural ventures by Local, State and Federal Government.
It is necessary to recall that the Bukuma community was host to the Federal Government’s Graduate Farmers’ Scheme and the Rivers State Government moribund School-to-Land Scheme under Governor Fidelis Oyakhilome. Bukuma was the only community in Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas that has the capacity to carry those agricultural programmes. However the lack of road to transport farm produce to Port Harcourt and facilitate the movement of the beneficiaries of the scheme who lived in the community which is several miles away from the farms, hampered the sustainability of the programme. The main Trans-Kalabari Road remains the best gift to the people of Degema, Asari Toru, and Akuku-Toru Local Government Areas. Kudos to Sir Siminilayi Fubara.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Continue Reading

Opinion

That  U.S. Capture of Maduro

Published

on

Quote:”Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction.”
The first part of this story was published in our last edition.
 
In Africa and the Middle East, regime change—whether by invasion, proxy warfare, or sanctions—has often left behind fractured states, weakened institutions, and prolonged instability. Washington’s motivations in Venezuela are widely understood: vast oil reserves, alliances with U.S. rivals, and symbolic defiance of American influence in the Western Hemisphere. But none of these reasons confer legal or moral legitimacy. Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction. If every powerful nation acted on its grievances in this manner, global chaos would inevitably follow. International law provides mechanisms for accountability. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), individuals accused of crimes against humanity or other grave offences are subject to investigation and prosecution through judicial processes.
Likewise, extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements, and Interpol mechanisms exist to ensure accountability while respecting due process. These frameworks were designed precisely to prevent unilateral enforcement of “justice” by military force. The most profound consequence of America’s action may not be in Caracas, but in the precedent it sets. If the world accepts that a superpower can unilaterally depose another country’s president, then the foundation of the international system is weakened. Sovereignty becomes conditional—no longer a right, but a privilege tolerated at the discretion of the powerful. Going forward, if another country invades its neighbour, will the United States retain the moral authority to impose sanctions or demand restraint? Some analysts already warn that parallels between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and America’s conduct in Venezuela risk further eroding global norms. Selective adherence to international law breeds cynicism and accelerates the drift toward a world governed by force rather than rules.
Power—military, economic, or political—should serve human progress and collective well-being, not domination and destruction. For African nations, many of which emerged from colonial rule through bitter struggle, this precedent is especially alarming. Sovereignty is not an abstract legal concept; it is a hard-won shield against external domination. Any erosion of that principle anywhere weakens it everywhere. Africa’s painful history of foreign interference makes this lesson especially urgent.  For me, the real issue is not whether Nicolás Maduro is a good or bad leader. That judgment belongs, first and foremost, to the Venezuelan people. The larger issue is whether the international system still operates on law—or has quietly reverted to hierarchy. If America insists it is defending global order, it must ask itself a difficult question: can an order survive when its most powerful guardian feels entitled to violate it? Until that question is answered honestly, the capture of a foreign president will remain not a triumph of justice, but a troubling symbol of a world drifting from law toward force.
If the United States felt so strongly about the allegations of terrorism, drug trafficking  against Maduro, were there no other lawful options? Judicial accountability, diplomacy, regional mediation, and multilateral pressure may be slow and imperfect, but they reflect respect for international law and sovereign equality. Military seizure is a blunt instrument. It humiliates institutions, radicalizes populations, and hardens resistance. It may remove a leader, but it rarely resolves the underlying crisis. History teaches that military interventions seldom result in stable democratic outcomes. More often, they breed resentment, resistance, and long-term instability. For the sake of global order and the rule of law, the United States should reconsider this path and recommit to diplomacy, legal cooperation, and respect for the sovereign equality of states. Former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly described the invasion of Venezuela as “unlawful and unwise,” warning that such actions “do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable.” Her words reflect a growing recognition, even within the United States, that force without legitimacy undermines both moral authority and global stability.
Should what happened in Venezuela serve as a wake-up call for corrupt African leaders who undermine the people’s right to choose their leaders? The answer is yes. The capture of Maduro should alarm African leaders who manipulate elections, weaken institutions, suppress opposition, undermine citizens’ rights, or cling to power at all costs. Venezuela faced widespread criticism over disputed elections and repression long before this episode, and that context shaped how the world reacted. This does not justify foreign military intervention, but it highlights an uncomfortable truth: prolonged democratic decay isolates nations and invites external pressure—from sanctions to diplomatic censure. Global opinion matters, and legitimacy at home strengthens sovereignty abroad. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and several African leaders have rightly condemned the events in Venezuela, invoking the principles of sovereignty and non-interference enshrined in international and regional law.
Beyond condemnation, however, African leaders must look inward. The continent’s future cannot be built on repression, constitutional manipulation, and personal greed. Leadership must reflect the will of the people, not desperation for power. Two days ago, a social commentator on a radio station argued that Trump’s action—though condemnable—demonstrates how far a leader can go for his country’s interest. According to this view, he did not intervene in Venezuela for personal enrichment, but to strengthen his nation. In stark contrast, many African leaders plunder their own countries. They siphon public resources, impose crushing taxes and harmful policies, and leave their citizens poorer—all for selfish gain. That contradiction is the deeper lesson Africa must confront.True sovereignty is protected not only by international law, but by accountable leadership at home.
 By:  Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

on

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Trending