Editorial

Recruitment: End Police, PSC Rift

Published

3 years ago

August 28, 2022

Despite efforts to end the needless altercation between the Police Service Commission (PSC) and the Inspector-General of Police (IGP) in the interest of national security, the Nigeria Police leadership has again entangled itself in an unwarranted dispute with the PSC over the recruitment of new constables. This trend goes on while the country is under siege by criminals whose blood-curdling activities have overwhelmed the existing security architecture.
The current imbroglio originated from an advert on the recruitment of police constables for this year on the PSC portal and published in a national newspaper. The Nigeria Police Force (NPF) reacted and urged Nigerians to disregard the publicity. In a statement released last Monday, the Force Public Relations Officer, CSP Olumuyiwa Adejobi, said the advert had no connection with the police and was not in tandem with their recruitment process.
This crisis began in 2019 when the then IGP, Mohammed Adamu, reportedly ‘hijacked’ a recruitment exercise. The PSC promptly challenged it in court, demanding that it was the only agency constitutionally authorised to conduct recruitment into the force. Its roles include promotion, recruitment, and discipline of police officers, from constables to Deputy Inspector-General of Police. The commission ultimately won, as the Court of Appeal set aside a judgement of the Federal High Court, which originally had granted the mandate to the NPF.
Hinging its judgement on paragraph 30, part 1 of the Third Schedule to the 1999 Constitution, which states, “The Commission shall have power to (a) appoint persons to offices (other than the office of the Inspector-General of Police) in the Nigeria Police Force,” the Appeal Court upheld the PSC’s constitutional mandate to recruit police constables. Instructively, the authority of the commission to recruit is also enshrined in the amended Police Act 2020 signed into law by Buhari.
Notwithstanding the judgement, it is tragic that the IGP further seeks to waste public funds on appeal to the Supreme Court, apparently backed by the contentious Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami. Aside from Baba’s intransigence, the blame for the impasse lies entirely with President Muhammadu Buhari’s failure to intervene strongly and end the dispute. He should immediately order the police to step back and allow the PSC to carry out its lawful duties.
Also in 2019, the National Industrial Court (NIJ) denounced the recruitment list of constables released by the police, describing it as an act of Illegality. But the then IGP ignored the court order. His successor has continued to toe the same line as friction subsists at a period when we need a synergy of a positive mix of ideas between the IGP’s office and the PSC to tackle insecurity in the country.
By insisting – despite the provisions of the law, a presidential intervention, and a subsisting appellate court order – on directly handling the recruitment of 10,000 new constables, the Inspector-General of Police, Usman Alkali Baba, has effectively delayed the planned phased enrolment of new police officers to beef up a badly depleted force and meet rising security challenges.
Governance in Nigeria has reached new lows. The police recruitment saga captures this afresh. Across the country, citizens are being slaughtered, maimed, robbed, kidnapped and raped without let or hindrance. On the rampage are terrorists of different hues, armed robbers, mass murderers, criminal gangs and vandals. The farms, homes, schools, and highways are unsafe.
Even police officers, soldiers, and security sanctuaries are being attacked. The insecurity has compelled a painful awareness that the police are hopelessly undermanned and that the country’s single national police structure is inadequate. Buhari seeks to add 40,000 recruits to the Force in phases to meet the challenge. Alas, the insensate bickering between the IGP and the PSC has stalled the laudable programme.
Hopes that the recruitment would then proceed were dashed when Baba, rather than obey the judicial pronouncement which also restrained the police from interfering with the recruitment, allegedly chose to reassert control over the exercise. Buhari should wade in more decisively by removing all obstacles to hiring new constables and reprimanding Baba. The PSC too should stick strictly to its mandate under the law and seek closer cooperation with the police hierarchy.
The police typically are responsible for maintaining public order and safety, enforcing the law, and preventing, detecting, and investigating criminal activities. These functions make it difficult for the institution to whimsically disobey the law, as the IGP has done. Furthermore, this rivalry is not helped by the consistent appointment of retired IGPs to chair the PSC. The President should also investigate that convention that has become rather unhelpful.
While they squabble, the country bleeds. The unjustifiable homicide of four policemen on 12 February by armed men at a checkpoint in Enugu South Local Government Area, Enugu State, was reported. Just 48 hours before, three police officers and one customs officer had been killed in comparable assaults against two checkpoints in the state capital. Six people, consisting of four police officers, were murdered at some other checkpoint in July 2021 by “unknown gunmen.” Abductors and terrorists have made Nigeria unacceptably hazardous.
The PSC workers union had, some time ago, declared a three-day warning strike over the reported takeover of the recruitment of 10,000 constables by the Force Headquarters. It was a continuation of the power tussle that has for the past four years pitched the commission against the office of the IGP.
An earlier intervention by Buhari in the recruitment debacle did not solve the situation, normally due to his inattentiveness. At a meeting he held with the then IGP (Adamu) and the PSC Chairman, Musiliu Smith, in September 2019, Buhari had affirmed the commission’s authority. It is maddening that the police management maintains disdain for the President’s position on this matter without sanction. It displays his terrible leadership. Buhari should make certain a quick resolution of the quandary for the recruitment to proceed immediately.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

19 hours ago

September 22, 2025

Uchechukwu Okwum

Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.

What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.

It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.

According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.

The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?

In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.

We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.

The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.

Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.

Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.

Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.

This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

20 hours ago

September 22, 2025

The Tide

Editorial

Rivers’ Retirees: Matters Arising

Published

2 weeks ago

September 8, 2025

The Tide

The Rivers State Government deserves commendation for the manner in which it conducted the last biometric exercise for pensioners in the state. For the first time in many years, the verification process was not only efficient but also humane, a development that has brought relief to a category of citizens that often bears the brunt of neglect.

Unlike previous verification exercises that left pensioners exhausted and unattended, the latest exercise set a refreshing precedent. Retirees were given proper and sumptuous meals, and in addition, the government paid the sum of N10,000 into their accounts to cushion their transportation costs. Such gestures go a long way in demonstrating that those who had laboured for the state are not forgotten in their twilight years.

The measure was particularly necessary given that some pensioners had to travel long distances to reach their verification centres. For elderly men and women, such journeys come with physical and financial strain. By recognising these realities and easing the burden, the government has shown that pensioners deserve dignity, not disdain.

Beyond this laudable act of consideration, the authorities must reflect on the very structure of pension verification. The era of compelling retirees to be physically present for routine verification should be reconsidered. With digital tools and innovation, the government can adopt systems that capture and confirm data without the stress of physical assembly. This is crucial for pensioners residing in other states or even abroad.

While we acknowledge the importance of verification in cleaning up pension records, we cannot ignore the darker side of the matter. It is regrettable that some allowances continue to be paid to deceased pensioners, with relatives fraudulently collecting the funds. The latest biometrics, thankfully, exposed some of these sharp practices. The exercise, therefore, is not only about order but also about justice.

We urge families of deceased pensioners to be patriotic enough to inform the government of the deaths of their loved ones. It is deeply shameful that in some instances, individuals attempted to impersonate late pensioners during the biometrics. Such behaviour undermines the spirit of honesty and deprives genuine retirees of their due entitlements.

The exercise also revealed another important area of concern: the health of pensioners. It is reassuring to learn that the state government has reportedly promised to take over the medical treatment of some retirees who arrived for the biometrics in critical condition. This is a step in the right direction. Elderly citizens, after years of service, should have access to special health care facilities in the state. Setting aside hospitals or designated centres for the aged is not just desirable but necessary.

While pension payments in Rivers State have remained consistent, attention must now be directed towards gratuities. Senior citizens deserve to receive their retirement benefits without the bureaucratic hitches that have often marred the process. After years of loyal service, nothing is more demoralising than to see retirees languish for want of their gratuities. Every worker, as Scripture reminds us, is worthy of his wage.

Retirement, in any civilised society, should not be reduced to a sentence of suffering. In dealing with pensioners, government must consistently wear a human face. The humane manner displayed during this verification exercise should not be a one-off. It must become the norm in all dealings with retirees. Measures must continually be put in place to ensure that they do not feel abandoned by the state they served.

One welcome innovation has already been introduced. The Sole Administrator of Rivers State, Vice Admiral (Rtd) Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas, has altered the method of gratuity payment. Pensioners now receive their monies directly into their bank accounts, eliminating the cheque-based system that for years served as fertile ground for corruption. This reform is both pragmatic and forward-looking. Similarly, the implementation of the N32,000 pension harmonisation is also commendable.

Direct payments gratuities ensure transparency and drastically reduce the possibility of diversion of funds. More importantly, they restore confidence in the system and assure pensioners that their entitlements will reach them without interference. In this way, the government has not only safeguarded the process but also upheld the principle of accountability.

Seamless gratuity payment has a ripple effect on the workforce as a whole. When workers are confident that retirement will not plunge them into hardship, the temptation to falsify age in order to remain in service is eliminated. Such reforms, therefore, enhance efficiency, honesty, and productivity in the public service.

In sum, the Rivers State Government has struck a refreshing chord in its handling of pension verification. It has shown empathy, innovation, and accountability. However, the momentum must be sustained, and the focus must shift towards modernising verification methods and prioritising retirees’ welfare in health, gratuity, and dignity.

When retirees are treated with compassion and fairness, the message to those still in service is clear: faithful service to the state will not go unrewarded. The humane verification exercise, though a single event, offers a hopeful glimpse of what governance can look like when people, especially the elderly, are placed at the heart of policy.