Editorial
Osun Poll: Cynosure Of All Eyes

With less than 24 hours to the July 16, 2022 governorship election in Osun State, voters seem to be prepared to elect a governor that will take charge of the affairs of the state in the next four years. Incumbent All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate, Governor Gboyega Oyetola, is eligible for re-election and has been renominated by his party. Nigeria’s electoral umpire, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) says it is totally ready to conduct tomorrow’s election.
The primaries, which were held between 16 February and 12 March, 2022, resulted in Oyetola winning the APC nomination for a second time, albeit amid whimpers from his primary challengers. For the main opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), longtime internal feuds led to two parallel primaries being held as a faction nominated former senatorial candidate, Dotun Babayemi, while the group recognised by the national PDP nominated former Senator for Osun West, Ademola Adeleke, the party’s 2018 nominee. INEC recognised Adeleke as the legitimate PDP contender.
The election will be a straight battle between Oyetola and Adeleke. This will be a replica of a similar outing in 2018, which was obviously a fierce battle between both candidates. But, two other parties, the Accord Party (AP) and the Labour Party (LP), would also make crucial impacts if they work harder to earn a victory. In all, the election will feature 15 political parties and candidates. Expectations are rife that tomorrow’s poll will be generously managed in terms of logistics than last month’s Ekiti ballot.
The Osun voting will once again demonstrate the degree of INEC’s preparedness and capability for the 2023 general elections. The vote-casting should mark the inception of a great shift to galvanise voters, especially the youths. Therefore, Osun people should equip themselves with their Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs) and troop into their polling booths to practise their franchise because their votes will count. They should resist any enticement to sell their PVCs. Capacity and courage are required from INEC to conduct a transparent voting exercise to enable the people to decide who their next governor will be.
INEC’s innovation in applying technology to the nation’s elections is quite estimable, as it has infused confidence in the country’s electoral process. The Bimodal Verification Accreditation System (BVAS) deployed by the commission comes across to have functioned more efficiently during the Ekiti election in June, as observed by the British High Commission and other election observers, unlike in Edo, Ondo, and Anambra States. The commission needs to improve on its feat in Osun.
An essential question is the security situation, especially in the face of some reported clashes in parts of the state. In one recent example, the collection of PVCs was disrupted in Erin Oke and Erin Ijesha Wards of Oriade Local Government Area, resulting in the loss of 46 voter cards. The commission has to act quickly to meet with relevant stakeholders for endorsement of the Peace Accord by political parties and candidates under the auspices of the National Peace Committee.
Major political parties in Osun have been exchanging mutual allegations of planned violence. The police should take prescient measures, deploy their intelligence-gathering machinery and apprehend anyone plotting mayhem. They should beam their searchlight on leaders of the transport unions, who have become the main perpetrators of political and electoral violence in the South-West. They and their sponsors should be ruthlessly dealt with. This will send a strong message to others that the 2023 elections will no longer be business as usual.
INEC must proactively curb vote buying. The unprecedented buying of votes that characterised the governorship election in Ekiti State should not be replicated in Osun to stave off the election from being exposed to massive fraud. Nigerians must do everything within their means to protect the voting processes of the Osun poll from being hijacked and manipulated by the powers that be. It could be uncontainable if vote buying is authorised to repeat in tomorrow’s guber poll the same way it was done in Ekiti.
The obvious outcome of vote buying is that it is gradually becoming the bane of democracy in Nigeria. For a democratic nation, the electorate are slowly losing their voting power by exchanging it for money and other material things. And by so doing, there is a big distortion and hindrance to the idea of a free and fair election which ensures that the electorate elect the leaders they deem fit to rule them.
Furthermore, the rampant spread of vote buying is acting as a catalyst for the destruction and death of democracy in the country and also acting as a hindrance to the possibilities of good governance. Political parties which cannot provide capable candidates to govern the country but can afford to buy votes are now using this means to purchase their candidates into power. The apparent outcome is that those positions will fall into the wrong hands.
Rather than buy votes, political actors in the state have to make their campaigns issue-based, devoid of frivolities and vague promises. If the state must progress, those seeking to govern it must tell the public what they intend to do. The electorate would then base their votes on the issues. The state deserves to have purposeful governance built on clear developmental ideas, not Naira, pounds, and dollars. They must also ensure that candidates are offering solutions, not just intangible promises that are neither measurable nor redeemable.
Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) should foster peace and boost inclusive election at the grassroots. They need to educate the voters, so that they can make egregious choices and perhaps reduce invalid votes. There is a necessity for continuous voters’ education to have desired results. CSOs can be effective in this regard. Groups, stakeholders, politicians, and political parties should sensitise, train, recruit, mobilise and deploy youths as volunteers for ward-to-ward and polling unit-to-polling unit anti-rigging ballot monitoring exercises.
INEC deserves to do better than the Ekiti poll. It should guarantee that the lapses witnessed in that state are not repeated. Political parties and their candidates always choose to move a step ahead just to beat the electoral umpire. The commission must adopt a proactive approach. It has been observed that some of the commission’s officials collude with political parties and their candidates to undermine elections. This must be disallowed in the Osun poll.
Editorial
No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike
Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.
What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.
It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.
According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.
The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?
In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.
We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.
The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.
Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.
Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.
Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.
This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.
Editorial
No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike
Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.
What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.
It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.
According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.
The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?
In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.
We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.
The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.
Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.
Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.
Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.
This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.
Editorial
Rivers’ Retirees: Matters Arising

-
Sports4 days ago
CAFCL : Rivers United Arrives DR Congo
-
Sports4 days ago
FIFA rankings: S’Eagles drop Position, remain sixth in Africa
-
Sports4 days ago
NPFL club name Iorfa new GM
-
Sports4 days ago
NNL abolishes playoffs for NPFL promotion
-
Sports4 days ago
NSF: Early preparations begin for 2026 National Sports Festival
-
Sports4 days ago
Kwara Hopeful To Host Confed Cup in Ilorin
-
Sports4 days ago
RSG Award Renovation Work At Yakubu Gowon Stadium
-
Politics4 days ago
Rivers Assembly Resumes Sitting After Six-Month Suspension