Editorial

2022: Making Nigeria Work

Published

4 years ago

December 31, 2021

For many Nigerians, 2021, which ends today with a bleat, was especially dreary. In all regards, par
ticularly in health, security, agriculture, education, social life and the economy, 2021 exacted more despondency on the people than the brief moments of abatement it gave. Nigeria was bedevilled by insecurity and Coronavirus while its economy plummeted. Indeed, the year would be commemorated for all the vicious scourge it brought on the country.
Confusion inundated the atmosphere after the eruption of the COVID-19 pandemic in China showed frantically across the world. The pandemic hit Nigeria on February 27, 2020, the index case infiltrating into a vulnerable country from Italy. As of December 31, 2020, Nigeria had listed 86,575 positive cases with 1,278 deaths. These figures tell only a part of the story, as the pandemic had uncovered the declension in the health system.
Many ailing people died from their maladies. The affluent, addicted to overseas medical expeditions, were restricted to the country by global travel prohibitions. In 2021, the second, third, and fourth waves of the pandemic tested the riven health system to the limit. The Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) informed of the jeopardy ahead, regretting that Nigerians had conciliated the non-pharmaceutical formalities successful in controlling the baneful disease.
Nigerians witnessed untold suffering following the economic lockdown that characterised the pandemic in 2020. Oil prices slumped catastrophically from low consumer demand, selling for $12.22 per barrel. This inflamed economic turbulence. Enormous job losses eventuated, with the unemployment rate escalating to 27.1 per cent from 23.1 per cent in the third quarter of 2018.
The National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) said 21.7 million persons were out of jobs; 13.9 million of them were youths. Underemployment hit 28.6 per cent for an amalgamated 55.7 per cent jobless rate. Aviation, transport, manufacturing, the hospitality industry and the financial sectors were the toughest hit. Unlike elsewhere where governments spiralled a slew of palliatives for the citizens, trifling measures were apportioned, as usual, by the predatory ruling elite.
The hardship could have been fended off or at least mollified with the right leadership. With President Muhammadu Buhari’s incongruous response, the economy recorded a second recession in five years in Q3 of 2020. In Q2, GDP declined by 6.10 per cent. By Q3, it slid further by 3.62 per cent, giving rise to recession. On the back of condensed production, inflation rose astronomically.
Foreign exchange rates increased pointedly. The Nigerian currency was exchanged for N500 per dollar in the parallel market, notwithstanding the billions the Central Bank of Nigeria injected to defend the national currency. At a point, it was compelled to vary its policy by granting Diaspora remittances to be withdrawn in the currencies they were sent home.
To get by, the administration resorted to the deregulation of imported fuel prices, but it was still unable to collect trillions of naira in taxes. The federal and state governments owed a backlog of salaries, pensions and gratuities. Debts, with little or nothing to show for them, keep going up. Nigeria’s current debt burden stood at N35.47 trillion as at the second quarter of 2021.
Indeed, the exiting year has been very turbulent. The challenges have remained the same — worsening economic condition, a heated polity, a disunited heterogeneous country, a hugely corrupt public, weak democratic institutions, insecurity, wobbling health sector, decayed education system, collapsed infrastructure, soaring unemployment, and a unitary system masquerading as federalism, among others.
Therefore, 2022 is a year of greater expectations. Nigerians hope to see their country bounce back again. They anxiously yearn for a turn-around across the sectors. To accomplish the collective goal, they must embrace governance as a joint enterprise involving the active participation and cooperation of those in the corridor of power and the citizenry.
Government must resolve to govern well while Nigerians must also determine to be good citizens. There should be no shortage of patriotism. This should be the summary of the combined New Year resolutions that are meaningful and result-driven. If government and citizens make and abide by these resolutions, all will largely be well with the country in the coming year.
In 2022, governments at the federal and state levels should demonstrate commitment towards the strategic and effective execution of their budgets, which are vital to the national economic sustainability and recovery from stagnation. Projects execution should generate employment, support the drive for investment and boost public welfare.
On the political front, the National Assembly should resolve to speed up the constitution amendment. If the review does not dismantle certain elements of ‘unitarism,’ the effort will be in vain. The two main political parties should put their houses in order and promote greater inclusion and internal democracy. Their crisis resolution mechanisms should be fortified as they prepare for congresses and conventions. Political gladiators should refrain from heating the polity ahead of 2023.
There should be a new resolution on the economy. The Nigerian economy, according to experts, has prospects, which gives the hope of a brighter future, if the required reforms are embarked upon. But, the current picture is awful and scary. Poverty is growing by leaps and bounds. Many are hungry and angry. Industrialists are in pain over the cost of production. Insecurity, epileptic power supply and the growing perception of Nigeria as a bastion of corruption are discouraging to investors.
However, after more than six years in the saddle, it is obvious Buhari is not in control and his regime lacks the basic ideas and courage to change Nigeria. At a time when the country requires decisive leadership and the President’s close aides seek power for its sake, it is a dire time to be a Nigerian. The option for a better future lies with everyone. Therefore, in 2022, Nigerians should take their destinies into their hands to make the country work again.

Editorial

Charge Before New Rivers Council Helmsmen

Published

12 hours ago

September 29, 2025

The Tide

On the 30th of August, Rivers people trooped out to participate in local government elections conducted across the state. These elections, which produced new chairmen and councillors for the 23 local government areas (LGAs), were organised by the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC). The exercise has ushered in a new crop of grassroots leaders whose shoulders now bear the responsibility of steering the affairs of their respective councils. With the polls concluded and winners duly announced, the time has come for the newly elected officials to roll up their sleeves and begin the hard work of governance.

According to the results declared by RSIEC, the All Progressives Congress (APC) secured a dominant lead, winning chairmanship seats in 20 of the 23 local government councils, while the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) clinched the remaining three. This outcome not only reflects the current political dynamics in the state but also places a significant weight of expectation on the shoulders of the APC-led councils to justify the confidence reposed in them by the electorate. It is imperative that political rhetoric now gives way to tangible development, especially at the grassroots level where government is felt most directly.

Following the elections, the successful chairmen were officially sworn into office by the former Sole Administrator of Rivers State, Vice Admiral (rtd) Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas. The solemn ceremony marked a transition from campaign promises to the reality of public service. With their inauguration complete, the time for celebration has ended; the time for delivery has commenced. The electorate now awaits meaningful action that reflects the hopes and aspirations of the voting public.

As helmsmen of their various LGAs, these leaders must quickly settle down to work. Their constituents expect them to provide direction, formulate policies, and execute programmes that will uplift communities long neglected. The local government tier is closest to the people and, as such, must rise above politicking to meet the everyday needs of the citizenry. It is not enough to occupy office; they must make their impact visibly and positively felt across their domains.

The Supreme Court ruling mandating direct allocation of funds to local governments—although not yet fully implemented—is a welcome development that underscores the autonomy of the third tier of government. Once this is operationalised, the excuses often cited for underperformance will no longer hold water. With funds directly accessed from the Federation Account, council administrations will be better empowered to meet the developmental needs of their localities, if only they manage resources judiciously and prioritise the right projects.

The onus is now on the chairmen to contribute meaningfully to the broader development of Rivers State. The state government cannot and should not be expected to do everything. Local government councils have defined responsibilities—ranging from rural infrastructure, primary healthcare, and basic education to waste management and local security—that must be adequately addressed. It is high time they stopped passing the buck and started acting as the elected leaders they are.

We extend our congratulations to all who emerged victorious in the elections. However, with this victory comes great responsibility. It is no longer about party affiliations or electoral campaigns; it is about governance. The chairmen must launch people-centred projects that will genuinely improve the lives of the rural populace—projects in water supply, road maintenance, school renovation, and youth empowerment, among others. Let their tenure be remembered for its impact, not its slogans.

Central to their mandate should be the welfare of workers. Council employees form the engine room of local governance, and their morale significantly affects service delivery. The new chairmen must ensure regular payment of salaries, staff training, and a conducive working environment. Neglecting this vital aspect will only hinder whatever grand plans they may have for their LGAs.

It is also essential to institute a robust peer review mechanism. The new LG officials should not operate in isolation; rather, they should learn from one another, share ideas, and compete constructively in a bid to outperform each other in service delivery. Healthy competition among council areas will drive innovation and foster accelerated development. Such a system will also help the public identify high-performing councils for emulation.

Given the typically short tenure of council administrations, it is crucial that they focus on projects that are realistic and impactful. Time and resources should not be wasted on white elephant ventures that are neither sustainable nor beneficial to the people. Instead, chairmen should pursue programmes that match their timelines and address immediate community needs.

Peace and security must remain a cardinal objective for all council steersmen. Regardless of who facilitated their election or what political loyalties they hold, they must ensure peace reigns in their areas. Development cannot thrive in an atmosphere of tension and distrust. These leaders must work closely with traditional rulers, youth groups, and civil society organisations to maintain law and order.

A critical understanding must also prevail—that chairmen are leaders of the people, not just leaders of political parties. They must conduct themselves as impartial administrators serving all constituents, irrespective of political affiliations. Additionally, they must work harmoniously with the state governor, who remains the leader of the state. Petty rivalries and political infighting serve no purpose in the development agenda.

Now that the elections are over and governance has begun, it is essential for these chairmen and councillors to adopt an inclusive approach. They must carry everyone along—party members and opposition alike—in their development plans. Creating division or playing favourites will only fracture communities and stall progress. Leadership at the grassroots demands fairness, equity, and a listening ear.

Rivers people have played their part by coming out to vote. The baton has now been passed to the new council helmsmen. They must seize the opportunity to leave lasting legacies in their communities. History will not judge them by the number of rallies they held or the speeches they gave, but by the quality of life they brought to their people. Let them not squander this moment.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

7 days ago

September 22, 2025

The Tide

Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.

What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.

It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.

According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.

The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?

In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.

We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.

The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.

Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.

Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.

Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.

This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.