Editorial

Need For S’South Dev Commission

Published

6 years ago

May 31, 2019

President Muhammadu Buhari, on April 9, 2019, inaugurated the Maj-Gen Paul Tarfa-led 11-member board of the North East Development Commission (NEDC), established on October 25, 2017, with the mandate to coordinate the rebuilding of the insurgency-ravaged North East region. The National Assembly had in October, 2016 passed the bill while the president signed it into law in October, 2017.
The NEDC is charged with the responsibility to, “among other things, receive and manage funds from allocation of the Federal Account, local and international donors for the settlement, rehabilitation and reconstruction of roads, houses and business premises of victims of insurgency as well as tackling menace of poverty, illiteracy level, ecological problems and any other related environmental or developmental challenges in the North-East states” of Adamawa, Bauchi, Borno, Gombe, Taraba and Yobe.
Modelled along the management structure of the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), with a governing board, comprising a chairman; a managing director and chief executive; three executive directors (one from each member-state not being represented by the chairman of the board, the managing director and the representative of the North-East zone); one person each to represent the six geo-political zones of Nigeria; and one person to represent the Federal Ministry of Finance; and Budget and National Planning.
Similarly, the Senate on December 12, 2018, passed a 30-clause bill sponsored by Senator Samuel Anyanwu, and designed to establish the South East Development Commission (SEDC) to receive, manage and administer funds from allocation from the federation for the rehabilitation, reconstruction and reparation for lost houses and businesses of victims of the Nigerian Civil War, and also address any environmental or developmental challenges as well as other related matters in the geo-political zone, comprising Abia, Anambra, Ebonyi, Enugu and Imo States.
The House of Representatives concurred to the bill on May 16, 2019. And both chambers curiously failed to consider the fact that all South-South states also suffered devastating impacts from the ravages of the civil war, including dislocation and destruction of properties and businesses, in addition to loss of loved ones.
Designed to lay to rest incessant agitations from various quarters of marginalisation and neglect of the zone and ensure the unity and oneness of the country as encapsulated in the Yakubu Gowon initiative for the area which was abandoned, the commission, when signed into law, will function just like the NDDC and the NEDC.
The Tide is aware of the clamour in certain quarters for establishment of development commissions for other geo-political zones to address the peculiar needs of their people and environments. We also reckon with another argument for the creation of Nigerian Development Commission as a clearing house for synthesizing, managing and coordinating the development needs of each zone in the country rather than encumbering the nation with development commissions in each geo-political zone.
While we are not opposed to concerted and integrated efforts to secure the development of each of the zones, we must caution politicians to be careful not to politicize everything in the country.
We acknowledge that what is good for the goose is also good for the gander, but both the National Assembly and the Federal Government must realize that the NDDC, which every politician is struggling to replicate in their zone, was informed by centuries of fears of marginalization, neglect, oppression and deprivation of minority groups in the Niger Delta, which did not include the South-East and South-West regions.
While we appreciate the establishment of the NDDC in 2000 with the mission of facilitating the rapid, even and sustainable development of the Niger Delta into a region that is economically prosperous, socially stable, ecologically regenerative and politically peaceful, we regret to state that the commission, as currently structured and constituted, does not represent the interest and concerns of the age-long deprived people of the South-South.
We say so because with the political definition of the Niger Delta, as contained in the NDDC Act, which added Abia and Imo from the South-East, and Ondo from the South-West zones as members and beneficiaries of the commission’s policies and programmes, the core South-South states of Akwa Ibom, Bayelsa, Cross River, Delta, Edo and Rivers have been glaringly short-changed, and the main purpose of the NDDC clearly defeated, ab initio.
Indeed, when the colonial administration ventilated the concerns of the minority groups in the Niger Delta, and held several conferences before Nigeria’s Independence to agree on workable structures to manage the peculiar development needs of the people, the present configuration was not in the picture, as the now South-East and South-West regions were comfortable with the status and pace of development in their communities.
We think that the creation of SEDC, and possibly, South West Development Commission in future, will give such states as Abia, Imo and Anambra in the South-East, and Ondo and Lagos in the South-West, as well as Bauchi and Borno in the North-East, where crude oil have been found, and is being exploited or exploration is ongoing, undue advantage over the South-South states, because they will still benefit from the NDDC.
This is why we insist on the establishment of the South-South Development Commission (SSDC) to frontally tackle the environmental and development challenges of the impoverished people. We believe that if there is any zone in this country that requires special development agenda and institution to harness its challenges and drive development of affected communities, it is the South-South. If for nothing, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Report recommendations have set the groundwork for the establishment of such commission, with dedicated funding, for addressing the social, economic, environmental and developmental issues in the zone.
We, therefore, challenge National Assembly members from the six states in the zone to come together, articulate and formulate a bill to establish the SSDC, specifically tailored to resolve the resolutions and recommendations of the 1958 Willinks Commission. Perhaps, the lawmakers would also need to synergise with political leaders in the zone, especially governors, to frame a structure and institution that would be sustainable and address the people’s concerns, in the long run. This step, we think, will assuage frayed nerves in the zone, who feel disadvantaged by the subsisting NDDC Act, coverage, management structure and mandate.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

4 days ago

September 22, 2025

The Tide

Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.

What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.

It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.

According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.

The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?

In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.

We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.

The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.

Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.

Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.

Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.

This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

4 days ago

September 22, 2025

The Tide

Editorial

Rivers’ Retirees: Matters Arising

Published

3 weeks ago

September 8, 2025

The Tide

The Rivers State Government deserves commendation for the manner in which it conducted the last biometric exercise for pensioners in the state. For the first time in many years, the verification process was not only efficient but also humane, a development that has brought relief to a category of citizens that often bears the brunt of neglect.

Unlike previous verification exercises that left pensioners exhausted and unattended, the latest exercise set a refreshing precedent. Retirees were given proper and sumptuous meals, and in addition, the government paid the sum of N10,000 into their accounts to cushion their transportation costs. Such gestures go a long way in demonstrating that those who had laboured for the state are not forgotten in their twilight years.

The measure was particularly necessary given that some pensioners had to travel long distances to reach their verification centres. For elderly men and women, such journeys come with physical and financial strain. By recognising these realities and easing the burden, the government has shown that pensioners deserve dignity, not disdain.

Beyond this laudable act of consideration, the authorities must reflect on the very structure of pension verification. The era of compelling retirees to be physically present for routine verification should be reconsidered. With digital tools and innovation, the government can adopt systems that capture and confirm data without the stress of physical assembly. This is crucial for pensioners residing in other states or even abroad.

While we acknowledge the importance of verification in cleaning up pension records, we cannot ignore the darker side of the matter. It is regrettable that some allowances continue to be paid to deceased pensioners, with relatives fraudulently collecting the funds. The latest biometrics, thankfully, exposed some of these sharp practices. The exercise, therefore, is not only about order but also about justice.

We urge families of deceased pensioners to be patriotic enough to inform the government of the deaths of their loved ones. It is deeply shameful that in some instances, individuals attempted to impersonate late pensioners during the biometrics. Such behaviour undermines the spirit of honesty and deprives genuine retirees of their due entitlements.

The exercise also revealed another important area of concern: the health of pensioners. It is reassuring to learn that the state government has reportedly promised to take over the medical treatment of some retirees who arrived for the biometrics in critical condition. This is a step in the right direction. Elderly citizens, after years of service, should have access to special health care facilities in the state. Setting aside hospitals or designated centres for the aged is not just desirable but necessary.

While pension payments in Rivers State have remained consistent, attention must now be directed towards gratuities. Senior citizens deserve to receive their retirement benefits without the bureaucratic hitches that have often marred the process. After years of loyal service, nothing is more demoralising than to see retirees languish for want of their gratuities. Every worker, as Scripture reminds us, is worthy of his wage.

Retirement, in any civilised society, should not be reduced to a sentence of suffering. In dealing with pensioners, government must consistently wear a human face. The humane manner displayed during this verification exercise should not be a one-off. It must become the norm in all dealings with retirees. Measures must continually be put in place to ensure that they do not feel abandoned by the state they served.

One welcome innovation has already been introduced. The Sole Administrator of Rivers State, Vice Admiral (Rtd) Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas, has altered the method of gratuity payment. Pensioners now receive their monies directly into their bank accounts, eliminating the cheque-based system that for years served as fertile ground for corruption. This reform is both pragmatic and forward-looking. Similarly, the implementation of the N32,000 pension harmonisation is also commendable.

Direct payments gratuities ensure transparency and drastically reduce the possibility of diversion of funds. More importantly, they restore confidence in the system and assure pensioners that their entitlements will reach them without interference. In this way, the government has not only safeguarded the process but also upheld the principle of accountability.

Seamless gratuity payment has a ripple effect on the workforce as a whole. When workers are confident that retirement will not plunge them into hardship, the temptation to falsify age in order to remain in service is eliminated. Such reforms, therefore, enhance efficiency, honesty, and productivity in the public service.

In sum, the Rivers State Government has struck a refreshing chord in its handling of pension verification. It has shown empathy, innovation, and accountability. However, the momentum must be sustained, and the focus must shift towards modernising verification methods and prioritising retirees’ welfare in health, gratuity, and dignity.

When retirees are treated with compassion and fairness, the message to those still in service is clear: faithful service to the state will not go unrewarded. The humane verification exercise, though a single event, offers a hopeful glimpse of what governance can look like when people, especially the elderly, are placed at the heart of policy.