Opinion
Nigerians’ Fate In Buhari’s Second Tenure
On December 14, 2018, President Muhamadu Buhari summoned governors of the 36 states of the federation for a meeting at the Presidential Villa, Abuja. ln the said meeting, the president reportedly unequivocally informed the state governors that the country’s economy was in a bad shape.
The president, no doubt, may have chosen to lay bare the real state of the nation’s economy so as to propel his lieutenants; the various state captains, to a reorientation towards governance.
On account of this, he challenged the governors to redouble efforts in addressing infrastructural deficiencies in their respective states in order to revamp the nation’s economy.
For merely admitting that the nation’s economy was in a bad shape, Atiku Abubakar, the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) presidential candidate in the last presidential election, called for the resignation of the president.
Atiku’s reason was that the President had failed to apply new methods in addressing the challenges facing the country, and so the only tenable interpretation is that the president cannot fix the economic problem of the nation.
In a statement by his Special Assistant on Public Communication, Mr Phrank Shaibu, Atiku said the president’s confession that the economy was in a bad shape was a very sad one, stating that what Nigerians need now is leadership which has the political will, administrative experience and sound economic acumen to get Nigeria working again.
Presenting Buhari as one bereft of the technicalities in fixing the nation’s economic decay, a reason for which he ought not be re-elected, Atiku reminded Nigerians of a prediction he allegedly credited to the British multinational bank, HSBC, which states that “re-electing President Buhari in 2019 could plunge Nigeria into a deeper economic hardship”.
His words, “Or do we need a prophet to tell us that the President’s admission is a vindication of our long-held position, and indeed the forecast by HSBC recently cited by the Nigerian media where the bank said a second term for Buhari would greatly affect the economy of the country?”
While Atiku ruminated in his conviction of Buhari as a no longer viable material for the Aso Rock villa, he had people who, though privately, shared same thought with him.
For Mr. Donald Duke, presidential candidate of Social Democratic Party (SDP), the situation in Nigeria is so frightening. He described as unthinkable, any attempt to leave the fate of Nigeria in the hands of the current administration for yet another four years.
Duke was said to have hinged his own fears on the security and economic circumstances of the country, which to him, tend to expose the ineptitude of the government in power.
He is of the view that there is currently a general disenchantment in the country – the rich, the poor, the not-too-rich , the not- too- poor, all feeling that we can do better than we have been doing in the last 20 years or thereabout.
Duke tries to explain that the PDP was roundly rejected in 2015 because it was squandering the nation’s resources; and thereafter, a lot of hopes were placed on the APC and the reputation of President Muhammadu Buhari.
Unfortunately, in spite of this administration’s purported fight against corruption, Duke regrets that three years into the administration, “we are back to the way we felt in 2015”. He continues to see the country even more corrupt than ever.
He complained that Nigerians are rather learning to live with the security situation which has failed to improve. According to him, it was recently reported that Nigeria has the largest concentration of poor people in the world, a situation he foresees would rather get worse even as the population grows by the day.
The Bishop of Living Faith Church (aka Winners Chapel), Bishop David Oyedepo, had also in one of his interviews with newsmen, expressed his grouse with the administration of President Muhammadu Buhari.
Oyedepo alleged that the Buhari government has, since 2015, handled the killings of Nigerians especially those from the Middle Belt states with kid gloves. Speaking on the killings in some parts of the country, Oyedepo said: “Nobody is qualified to lead by morality without a feeling for people’s life”.
Howbeit, amidst complaints and criticisms, it is quite obvious that the ship of governance is such an enormous one to steer, just as we know that many make better players while they remain outside the field of play.
Nigerians have spoken, it is their pulse that is being expressed no matter how. The president, whose efforts the masses tend not to be satisfied with is also not deaf. I do not want to conclude that President Buhari’s intention for a second outing in power is to frustrate Nigerians.
Therefore, for those who ab initio adjudged him capable or otherwise, it is case closed. I think further acrimony via hate speech or overt insult may no longer be necessary. The president needs our cooperation as much as we need his.
The only credible means of choosing a leader, in a democratic setting like ours, is by election and President Muhammadu Buhari has, through this sole credible means, been returned the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. Like every other leader would have an agenda for his subjects, President Buhari is not without a mission for Nigeria, only time will tell.
It is ,therefore, our own part to pray God to endow him with the political will, administrative experience and sound economic acumen to get Nigeria working again. Congratulations, Nigeria!
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
Quote:”While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries”.
The Governor of Rivers State, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, recently urged youths in the Rivers State to take advantage of the vast opportunities available to become employers of labour and contribute meaningfully to the growth and development of the State. Governor Fubara noted that global trends increasingly favour entrepreneurship and innovation, and said that youths in Rivers State must not be left behind in harnessing these opportunities. The Governor, represented by the Secretary to the State Government, Dr Benibo Anabraba, made this known while declaring open the 2026 Job Fair organised by the Rivers State Government in partnership with the Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA) in Port Harcourt. The Governor acknowledged the responsibility of government to create jobs for its teeming youth population but noted that it is unrealistic to absorb all job seekers into the civil service.
“As a government, we recognise our duty to provide employment opportunities for our teeming youths. However, we also understand that not all youths can be accommodated within the civil service. This underscores the need to encourage entrepreneurship across diverse sectors and to partner with other stakeholders, including the youths themselves, so they can transition from being job seekers to employers of labour,” he said. It is necessary to State that Governor Fubara has not only stated the obvious but was committed to drive youth entrepreneurship towards their self-reliance and the economic development of the State It is not news that developed economies of the world are skilled driven economies. The private sector also remains the highest employer of labour in private sector driven or capitalist economy though it is also the responsibility of government to create job opportunities for the teeming unemployed youth population in Nigeria which has the highest youth unemployed population in the subSahara Africa.
The lack of job opportunities, caused partly by the Federal Government’s apathy to job creation, the lack of adequate supervision of job opportunities economic programmes, lack of employable skills by many youths in the country have conspired to heighten the attendant challenges of unemployment. The challenges which include, “Japa” syndrome (travelling abroad for greener pastures), that characterises the labour market and poses threat to the nation’s critical sector, especially the health and medical sector; astronomical increase in the crime rate and a loss of interest in education. While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries.
While commending the Rivers State Government led by the People First Governor, Sir Siminilayi Fubara for initiating “various training and capacity-building programmes in areas such as ICT and artificial intelligence, oil and gas, maritime, and the blue economy, among others”, it is note-worthy that the labour market is dynamic and shaped by industry-specific demands, technological advancements, management practices and other emerging factors. So another sector the Federal, State and Local Governments should encourage youths to explore and harness the abounding potentials, in my considered view, is Agriculture. Agriculture remains a veritable solution to hunger, inflation, and food Insecurity that ravages the country. No doubt, the Nigeria’s arable landmass is grossly under-utilised and under-exploited.
In recent times, Nigerians have voiced their concerns about the persistent challenges of hunger, inflation, and the general increase in prices of goods and commodities. These issues not only affect the livelihoods of individuals and families but also pose significant threats to food security and economic stability in the country. The United Nations estimated that more than 25 million people in Nigeria could face food insecurity this year—a 47% increase from the 17 million people already at risk of going hungry, mainly due to ongoing insecurity, protracted conflicts, and rising food prices. An estimated two million children under five are likely to be pushed into acute malnutrition. (Reliefweb ,2023). In response, Nigeria declared a state of emergency on food insecurity, recognizing the urgent need to tackle food shortages, stabilize rising prices, and protect farmers facing violence from armed groups. However, without addressing the insecurity challenges, farmers will continue to struggle to feed their families and boost food production.
In addition, parts of northwest and northeast Nigeria have experienced changes in rainfall patterns making less water available for crop production. These climate change events have resulted in droughts and land degradations; presenting challenges for local communities and leading to significant impact on food security. In light of these daunting challenges, it is imperative to address the intricate interplay between insecurity and agricultural productivity. Nigeria can work toward ensuring food security, reducing poverty, and fostering sustainable economic growth in its vital agricultural sector. In this article, I suggest solutions that could enhance agricultural production and ensure that every state scales its agricultural production to a level where it can cater to 60% of the population.
This is feasible and achievable if government at all levels are intentional driving the development of the agricultural sector which was the major economic mainstay of the Country before the crude oil was struck in commercial quantity and consequently became the nation’s monolithic revenue source. Government should revive the moribund Graduate Farmers Scheme and the Rivers State School-to-Land agricultural programmes to operate concurrently with other skills acquisition and development programmes. There should be a consideration for investment in mechanized farming and arable land allocation. State and local governments should play a pivotal role in promoting mechanized farming and providing arable land for farming in communities. Additionally, allocating arable land enables small holder farmers to expand their operations and contribute to food security at the grassroots level.
Nigeria can unlock the potential of its agricultural sector to address the pressing needs of its population and achieve sustainable development. Policymakers and stakeholders must heed Akande’s recommendations and take decisive action to ensure a food-secure future for all Nigerians.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Opinion
Of Protests And Need For Dialogue
Quote:“.Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement”
It was a turbulent week in the country, highlighting the widening gap between government intentions and public perception. From Abuja to Anambra and Lagos, citizens poured into the streets not just over specific grievances but in frustration with governance that often appears heavy-handed, confrontational, or insufficiently humane. While authorities may genuinely act in the public interest, their methods sometimes aggravate tensions rather than resolve them.
In Abuja, the strike by workers of the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) and the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) under the Joint Union Action Committee (JUAC) brought the capital to a near standstill. Their demands included five months’ unpaid wages, hazard and rural allowances, promotion arrears, welfare packages, pension and National Housing Fund remittances, and training and career progression concerns. These are core labour issues that directly affect workers’ dignity and livelihoods. Efforts to dialogue with the FCT Minister reportedly failed. Even after a court ordered the strike to end, workers persisted, underscoring the depth of discontent. Threats and sanctions only hardened positions.
The FCT crisis shows that industrial peace cannot be enforced through coercion. Dialogue is not weakness; it is recognition that governance is about people. Meeting labour leaders, listening attentively, clarifying grey areas, and agreeing on timelines could restore trust. Honesty and negotiation are far more effective than threats.
In Anambra, protests by Onitsha Main Market traders followed the government’s closure of the market over continued observance of a Monday sit-at-home, linked to separatist agitation. Governor Chukwuma Soludo described compliance as economic sabotage, insisting Anambra cannot operate as a “four-day-a-week economy.” While the governor’s concern is understandable, threats to revoke ownership, seize, or demolish the market risk escalating tensions. Many traders comply out of fear, not ideology. Markets are social ecosystems of families, apprentices, and informal networks; heavy-handed enforcement may worsen resistance. A better approach combines persuasion, dialogue with market leaders, credible security assurances, and gradual confidence-building. Coordinated political engagement with federal authorities could also reduce regional tensions.
In Lagos, protests erupted over demolition of homes in low-income waterfront communities such as Makoko, Owode Onirin, and Oworonshoki. The state defended these actions as necessary for safety, environmental protection, and urban renewal. While objectives are legitimate, demolitions drew criticism for lack of notice, compensation, and humane resettlement. Urban development without regard for human consequences risks appearing elitist and anti-poor. Where demolitions are unavoidable, transparent engagement, fair compensation, and realistic relocation must precede action to maintain public trust and social stability.
Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement.
Democracy cannot thrive on decrees, threats, or bulldozers alone. Leaders must listen as much as they command, persuade as much as they enforce. Minister Wike should see labour leaders as partners, Governor Soludo must balance firmness with sensitivity, and Lagos authorities should align urban renewal with compassion and justice. Protests are signals of communication failure. Dialogue, caution, and a human face in governance are not optional—they are necessities. Police and security agencies must respect peaceful protest as a constitutional right.
By: Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
-
Sports1 day agoArsenal Women End Man City’s Invincibility
-
Sports1 day agoU-20 WWC: Falconets claim qualifier win
-
Sports1 day agoInsurance Deepen Enyimba’s Trouble
-
Environment1 day agoRivers State Government Suspend Fire Service Collection Levies
-
Sports1 day agoYouth Olympics preparation Gears up
-
Environment1 day agoLASEMA pushes attitudinal change to cut fire outbreaks in Lagos
-
Sports1 day agoTornadoes Set For NPFL exit over Stadium Ban
-
Sports1 day agoCologne Youth Team Set Crowd Record
