Editorial
Checking Noise Pollution
As it has been the case since 2007, Saturday, March 3, 2018 was celebrated the world over as the World Hearing Day. Formerly known as International Ear Care Day, the day is held to raise awareness on how to prevent deafness and hearing loss, among others.
The theme of this year’s celebration was: “Hear The Future.”
According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), up from 360 million people five years ago, the world currently has 466 million people who suffer from disabling hearing loss. And the global body projects that an estimated 900 million could suffer from the condition by 2050 if nothing is done to stem the tide.
Among others, the WHO identified exposure to loud sounds through personal audio devices, entertainment venues and work places as causes of hearing loss, adding that it costs countries about 750 billion United States dollars annually in direct health costs and loss of productivity. The global health body, therefore, called on governments and their collaborators to take steps to check the unwholesome trend.
Perhaps, it is in line with this that the Rivers State Government through the Ministry of Environment set up a Special Committee on Noise Pollution to intervene and mitigate noise from personal, commercial and industrial sources.
Inaugurating the Committee, the State Commissioner for Environment, Prof. Roseline Konya, charged it to ensure that all residents in the State conform to an acceptable level of sound emitted from loud speakers, public address system and other devices employed in public or mass communication, as well as sound generated through industrial activities.
The Tide commends and encourages this latest move of the State government to control noise pollution in the State, even as we acknowledge the existence of a law promulgated by the then Police Commissioner, Fidelis Oyakhilome’s military administration on the subject matter.
Noise pollution, like any other kind of pollution, poses a veritable threat to the health and general well-being of individuals. In fact, cumulative effects of noise pollution can be felt in our homes, social event venues, places of work, schools and other learning environment and other areas of public gathering.
Studies have shown that consequences of regular exposure to consistent heightened sound levels in the work place or the environment include high blood pressure, sleep disturbances, annoyance, stress-related illness, speech interference, loss of concentration, hearing impairment and loss of productivity.
The WHO says that disabling hearing loss alone could affect “a person’s ability to communicate, socialise, learn, work and enjoy life, as it contributes to poverty, social isolation and feeling of loneliness”.
It is against this background that we appreciate the concern of the Rivers State Ministry of Environment and the task of the special committee to control noise pollution. The committee must approach and undertake its duty with all the seriousness that it deserves.
In doing this, the committee must embark on massive sensitisation of the public and creation of awareness on the dangers of noise pollution. The campaign must be taken, not only to markets, motor parks and other public places, but also to other places where there are considerable noise pollution.
To take the message to all the nooks and crannies of the State and to ensure success in this venture, the committee must synergise and form workable partnerships with the media, NGOs, security agencies, civil society groups, government agencies like the National Orientation Agency (NOA), among others.
More than anything else, government must muster the will to bring the law to bear on offenders whether groups, organisations or individuals. It is only in strict and impartial enforcement of extant laws, rules and regulations that sanity can be achieved and our people protected from the hazards of noise pollution.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics3 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics3 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics3 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News4 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Business4 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Politics3 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
