The mystery surrounding
the practice of journalism in Africa is guided by the chequered political history of African states and the evolving experiences of the practitioners of the profession. This is because the first African post colonial leaders acquired power through their stiff anti-colonial stand, carried through media activism, an avocation that rattled the colonial overlords and whittled down the influence of imperialism among African countries.
It is obvious that most of these nationalist leaders used the media, especially the print to propagate the cause of the struggle for political emancipation in a rather hostile but promising and prospective political climate.
The defects of colonial rule were persistently exposed on the pages of newspapers owned and managed by the nationalists, as they launched  vitriolic campaigns against colonialism and imperialism.
Foremost nationalist, Dr Nnamdi Azikiwe had a chain of newspapers, primarily engaged in the fight against colonial activities. Similarly, Kitoye Ajasa, Ernest Ikoli, Herbert Macaulay, Obafemi Awolowo, among others, used media activism as the greatest weapon of unnerving the forces of colonialism.
However, when the nationalists finally gained independence from colonial rule, they realised the potency of the press which they used to truncate the imperialist reign. They became the heroes of independence,  and realised that a free and unfettered press had the potency of mobilising the masses to the extent of causing a shift in the power base.
Censureship became the only means of taming the luxuriating influence of the media in mass mobilisation and rousing popular sensitivity. Media practitioners were henceforth faced with constraints aimed at limiting their institutional roles in the entire process of governance.
Despite the role of the media, explicitly spelt out in the constitution, the Nigerian media has been faced with grave challenges in the discharge of its responsibilities.
But the media has not rested on its oars in articulating issues of freedom from constraints, through reforms that will embolden its practitioners in an enabling environment.
Amidst strict regulations by successive Nigerian governments, especially during the military era, the media as the custodian of the conscience of society, had made bold advances in  creating public awareness on sensitive issues and raising the political consciousness of the masses.
As the fourth estate of the realm, the media is seen as a neutral arbiter with the moral obligation to check the excesses of the other machineries of government; and by implication journalists are expected to exert an unwinking surveillance over the daily runnings of government.
Such responsibilities however go with a price, and this accounts for why journalists are exposed to harassment, torture and incarceration by state powers. But the press has to justify public trust by remaining conscientious in carrying out its duties.
Nigeria as a multi-ethnic society is prone to the dictates of ethnic bigotry and unhealthy rivalry among the component ethnic nationalities. There are other salient issues that need to be addressed, such as the minority question, imbalances in revenue allocation, federal character, among others. While the President of Nigeria, Dr Goodluck Jonathan has offered a platform through the proposed national conference for Nigerians to work out a stronger prospect of national integration, it is also the responsibility of the media to raise national consciousness by drawing attention to the bumps on the country’s highway to nationhood. Given the precarious nature of the Nigerian state, the media stands a position of rekindling the waning tenets of patriotism by raising awareness on issues, that bind us together, rather than fanning the embers of disintegration. The media must see itself as the custodian of the people’s liberty, the harbingers of hope in the preservation of democratic liberties, and as such should be key partakers in the proposed national conference.
Comparatively, the Nigerian media has not lost touch with its obligation towards the society. While other professions seem to relapse into complacency and indifference towards societal problems, the media has persistently confronted the situation vigorously, exposing the frolics therein. The potency of the Nigerian press was best demonstrated during military rule, when it rattled successive military administrations until the enthronement of democracy in 1999.
The feat was achieved by the media through a formidable alliance with democratic blocks and civil society groups to redeem Nigeria from the claws of military reign. The feat was however not attained without a price as media houses were clamped down and journalists were jailed without trail.
While the media deserves commendation in its efforts towards the restoration of democratic structures in Nigeria, it should also be concerned about the sustenance of the structures put in place. Without dabbling into partisan politics, the media should moderate the political process by holding political office holders responsible to their oath of office.
The media should set the stage for political office seekers to tell the citizenry through media debates what development agenda they have for the people. Most media houses in Nigeria have since the inception of the present democratic disposition in the country set a good precedent in this regard. But unlike other civilised democracies  where party manifestoes and ideologies are sacrosanct, debates among political parties and their candidates in Nigeria have been laden with peripherial public gestures and patriotic phrases that end on their lips. There is no indepth commitment on the path of political parties towards achieving ideals that can positively affect the lives of Nigerians.
The porosity of our political system has resulted to a growing penchant on the path of all calibres of people to seek political office with reckless disregard for the attendant responsibilities that go with such positions.
The media  sets agenda for the socio-economic development of the country by placing conscience and transience at the expense of deceit and injustice, and rescue the country from its perilous state.
The media must be conscious and live up to its ombudsman role of rousing the sensitivity of the citizenry towards issues of national development and unity.
In carrying out these objectives, the press is expected to derive additional impetus from the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act.
Some pundits have argued that  the law will expose official secrecy and make the institutions of government vulnerable to unfettered infiltration by the press.
There is also a counter postulation that it would strengthen the institutions of government by engendering the tenets of accountability and transparency in governance. This school of thought believes that democracy thrives on free information flow, as the political objective of journalism is to contribute to national unity and participatory democracy. Journalism’s, ethical ideal therefore requires an exercise of a high sense of moral obligation, social responsibility, encompassing self restraint, and neutrality in line with the objectives of development communication, that is the hallmark of democracy.

Taneh Beemene