Editorial
Checking Rising Cost Of Cement
The ever-rising unit cost of cement in Nigeria is one issue which in the past decade has agitated the minds of stakeholders, particularly those in the housing and construction industry.
It is therefore little wonder when Lagos State Governor, Raji Fashola recently challenged the Federal Government to take decisive steps in combating the rising price of cement, to among other things, salvage the construction industry from imminent collapse.
Fashola’s worry is not isolated from that of other key players in the construction industry, who had, in several fora, expressed similar frustration over the persistent rise in price of cement. In fact, every well-meaning Nigerian feels the disturbing effects of the phenomenon.
The situation is so critical that the rising cost of cement has made the commodity to be beyond the reach of ordinary Nigerians desirous to build or own houses of their own. This is in spite of President Goodluck Jonathan’s intervention early last year.
During the interface with cement manufacturers and firms in the country, the president had prevailed on cement producers to review downwards, the cost of the product, so as to save the housing and construction sectors from imminent collapse.
The appeal, coming from the Number One Citizen, was heeded by the producers but the relief from that review was shortlived few months after, as the price of cement again skyrocketed to hit the roof top.
Sadly, the housing and construction industry continues to suffer, as the situation has worsened the nation’s housing deficit and apparently aggravated the problem of the average Nigerian, especially the poor.
Besides, the phenomenon has triggered high cost of rents and shelter so much so that even the middle-class could hardly afford decent houses for themselves or their families.
Apart from the negative impact of the cost of cement on the citizens, the situation has obvious implications on government’s aggressive infrastructural development policies at all tiers such as roads, bridges, housing, health and education facilities, among others.
It is against this backdrop that The Tide urges the cement manufacturers to look inwards and invest more on improving their productive capacity in the country, as a means of boosting job creation and reducing crime wave amongst the youth.
More importantly, key producers like Dangote, Ibeto, Eagle Cement, Ashaka Cement, among others, need to re-strategise so as to meet up with local demand of the product in order to avoid short-fall in supply of cement which usually leads to hike in price of the product.
On the other hand, the Federal Government should identify areas of concern and at once articulate measures that must provide the enabling environment for cement production to strive. One way to do this is to ensure that there is improved infrastrudure, particularly the need to provide regular power supply, good roads and a dependable transportation system.
Also, government should consider tax waivers and other incentives to the producers to encourage more competitive production activities by manufacturers which we believe would push down cement price.
In the interim, however, government should as a matter of urgency, liberalise the import of cement so as to make up for the shortfall in the demand of cement. This will, in the long run, help force down the price of the product, and enable government achieve its goals in the housing and construction sector, while accelerating the infrastructural development momentum of the country.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics2 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics2 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics2 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News2 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Rivers5 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News5 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics5 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured5 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
