Editorial

FG And Kerosene Scarcity

Published

14 years ago

May 13, 2011

Like a festering sore, the issue of kerosene scarcity had persisted at various times in different parts of the country. Sometimes, the product, otherwise known as Dual Purpose Kerosene (DPK), would be so scarce that many Nigerians are compelled to seek various alternatives.

In such circumstance, the privileged resort to the use of gas not minding its high-risk value while the less privileged embark on various methods of extracting dry firewood, including bush burning from the already depleted forests. Some even surrender to the use of charcoal for cooking.

But while the kerosene scarcity persists, its negative consequences are usually most unfortunate. Some callous businessmen cash in on the situation to adulterate the little quantity in circulation. And like a keg of gun power awaiting ignition, massive fire explosions claim many lives and raze houses.

In Rivers State, the effect has not been less severe. Not too long ago, a 12-year old Hope Fadae was flown to South Africa for medical treatment after a weekend kerosene explosion that killed his parents and three siblings. The list of victims and casualties is endless as adulterated kerosene-induced explosions had claimed lives at Abonnema Wharf, Eagle Island, Railway Quarters and other parts of the state.

Early in the year when kerosene scarcity resurfaced in Port Harcourt, about eight people lost their lives to kerosene explosion, and no fewer than 5,000 residents of Elechi Beach were rendered homeless.

Once more, Dual Purpose Kerosene has disappeared, and its absence is biting hard on the users as the product is either not seen or available at extremely exorbitant prices above the reach of the common people. The Tide’s recent market survey indicates that a litre of kerosene which officially sold for N2,400 is now N4,300 while a bottle rose from N100 to N300. As usual, reasons have been adduced for the scarcity.

While government officials said the post-election violence in the Northern part of the country was responsible, officials of Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria (IPMAN) argued that the partial deregulation of the product was reason for the scarcity. The IPMAN’s South East Zone Chairman, Chief Chukwudi Ezinwa, explained that while petrol is still subsidised, kerosene is partially deregulated.

Be that as it may, we are more concerned on government’s move to find a lasting solution to the scarcity, and give succour to the already over-stretched masses whose lives ultimately depend on use of kerosene without alternatives.

While we are not oblivious of the long term benefits of deregulation to the people and the economy of the nation, which include availability and quality content of the product, we make haste to say that the Federal Government should, as a matter of urgency, make a bold and definite statement on the nagging issue of deregulation while taking serious action to address the life-threatening situation.

Agreed, it is not unlikely that the post-election violence in some parts of the North may have contributed to the difficulty in procuring and circulating the product within the period, its lingering effect could not have escalated to the current magnitude as witnessed in various parts of the country. Even so, the fact that the scarcity has persisted in the South East, South South and South West, which did not witness any post-election violence gives room for more answers to this troubling enigma.

Nevertheless, we urge government not to relent in seeking measures to cushion the harsh effects of the scarcity and the exorbitant price of kerosene on the people. In fact, we insist that government should introduce economic policies that would benefit the masses and also ensure that corrupt officials do not hijack the process and impoverish society the more. For instance, several poverty alleviation programmes introduced in the past were abused as there became conduit pipes for siphoning government funds.

Unless this is checked, the years of sacrifice and unquantifiable contributions of the oil-bearing communities in the Niger Delta would be in vain, if nothing is urgently done to ensure that they are not starved of the end-product extracted from their soil, even if they must pay for it.

We are, however, not unmindful of the antics of dubious elements in the country whose stock-in-trade hinges on greed and sharp practices to circumvent government’s people-oriented programmes for their selfish interests.

Such people must be checked in their tracks for President Goodluck Jonathan to sustain his efforts, now a reference point, at ensuring availability of petroleum products nationwide. The Tide expects that the various arms of government and extra-ministerial agencies such as the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) War Room, including officials of the Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR), Pipeline Products Marketing Company (PPMC) and Petroleum Products Pricing and Regulatory Agency (PPPRA) should synergise with major and independent marketers for the purposes of maintaining unfettered delivery of petroleum products to the masses.

In addition, government should endeavour to put to optimal use the nation’s existing four refineries, and expose economic saboteurs in the system who would not see anything good with our refineries functioning in full capacity.

It is, indeed a cheering news that private investors are at the verge of establishing refineries. But we note that the take-off of these refineries and the attendant encumbrances are quite discouraging. We, therefore, urge the Federal Government to ensure full commitment and engage genuine and sincere investors. Such enduring plans, no doubt, would end the frequent scarcity of petrol and diesel which are already scarce in some parts of the country, and particularly kerosene, which is so dear to the common people.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

14 hours ago

September 22, 2025

Uchechukwu Okwum

Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.

What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.

It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.

According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.

The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?

In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.

We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.

The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.

Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.

Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.

Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.

This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

15 hours ago

September 22, 2025

The Tide

Editorial

Rivers’ Retirees: Matters Arising

Published

2 weeks ago

September 8, 2025

The Tide

The Rivers State Government deserves commendation for the manner in which it conducted the last biometric exercise for pensioners in the state. For the first time in many years, the verification process was not only efficient but also humane, a development that has brought relief to a category of citizens that often bears the brunt of neglect.

Unlike previous verification exercises that left pensioners exhausted and unattended, the latest exercise set a refreshing precedent. Retirees were given proper and sumptuous meals, and in addition, the government paid the sum of N10,000 into their accounts to cushion their transportation costs. Such gestures go a long way in demonstrating that those who had laboured for the state are not forgotten in their twilight years.

The measure was particularly necessary given that some pensioners had to travel long distances to reach their verification centres. For elderly men and women, such journeys come with physical and financial strain. By recognising these realities and easing the burden, the government has shown that pensioners deserve dignity, not disdain.

Beyond this laudable act of consideration, the authorities must reflect on the very structure of pension verification. The era of compelling retirees to be physically present for routine verification should be reconsidered. With digital tools and innovation, the government can adopt systems that capture and confirm data without the stress of physical assembly. This is crucial for pensioners residing in other states or even abroad.

While we acknowledge the importance of verification in cleaning up pension records, we cannot ignore the darker side of the matter. It is regrettable that some allowances continue to be paid to deceased pensioners, with relatives fraudulently collecting the funds. The latest biometrics, thankfully, exposed some of these sharp practices. The exercise, therefore, is not only about order but also about justice.

We urge families of deceased pensioners to be patriotic enough to inform the government of the deaths of their loved ones. It is deeply shameful that in some instances, individuals attempted to impersonate late pensioners during the biometrics. Such behaviour undermines the spirit of honesty and deprives genuine retirees of their due entitlements.

The exercise also revealed another important area of concern: the health of pensioners. It is reassuring to learn that the state government has reportedly promised to take over the medical treatment of some retirees who arrived for the biometrics in critical condition. This is a step in the right direction. Elderly citizens, after years of service, should have access to special health care facilities in the state. Setting aside hospitals or designated centres for the aged is not just desirable but necessary.

While pension payments in Rivers State have remained consistent, attention must now be directed towards gratuities. Senior citizens deserve to receive their retirement benefits without the bureaucratic hitches that have often marred the process. After years of loyal service, nothing is more demoralising than to see retirees languish for want of their gratuities. Every worker, as Scripture reminds us, is worthy of his wage.

Retirement, in any civilised society, should not be reduced to a sentence of suffering. In dealing with pensioners, government must consistently wear a human face. The humane manner displayed during this verification exercise should not be a one-off. It must become the norm in all dealings with retirees. Measures must continually be put in place to ensure that they do not feel abandoned by the state they served.

One welcome innovation has already been introduced. The Sole Administrator of Rivers State, Vice Admiral (Rtd) Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas, has altered the method of gratuity payment. Pensioners now receive their monies directly into their bank accounts, eliminating the cheque-based system that for years served as fertile ground for corruption. This reform is both pragmatic and forward-looking. Similarly, the implementation of the N32,000 pension harmonisation is also commendable.

Direct payments gratuities ensure transparency and drastically reduce the possibility of diversion of funds. More importantly, they restore confidence in the system and assure pensioners that their entitlements will reach them without interference. In this way, the government has not only safeguarded the process but also upheld the principle of accountability.

Seamless gratuity payment has a ripple effect on the workforce as a whole. When workers are confident that retirement will not plunge them into hardship, the temptation to falsify age in order to remain in service is eliminated. Such reforms, therefore, enhance efficiency, honesty, and productivity in the public service.

In sum, the Rivers State Government has struck a refreshing chord in its handling of pension verification. It has shown empathy, innovation, and accountability. However, the momentum must be sustained, and the focus must shift towards modernising verification methods and prioritising retirees’ welfare in health, gratuity, and dignity.

When retirees are treated with compassion and fairness, the message to those still in service is clear: faithful service to the state will not go unrewarded. The humane verification exercise, though a single event, offers a hopeful glimpse of what governance can look like when people, especially the elderly, are placed at the heart of policy.