Connect with us

Opinion

Kudos For Immortalising Prof Ake

Published

on

The decision by Rivers State Government to immortalise late Professor Claude Ake will certainly be widely acclaimed and highly honoured by eminent academics, intellectuals, environmental crusaders and opinion leaders in the six continents of the world.

For the past 15 years, well meaning people all over the world have regarded Nigeria as a nation where recognition is only accorded to politicians and money bags, while intellectual icons are not recognised.

Honour should actually be given to whom honour is due. We should honour people who have excelled academically to inspire the youths. Professor Ake who was once described as the World’s Greatest Political Economist remains a pride to Africa.

That the present administration in Rivers State had this in mind over the years is demonstrated in the fact that the State’s 2010 Calendar with the theme -”Our Heroes our Pride” featured Professor Ake in the month· of February, the very month he was born some 72 years ago.

Late Professor Ake was one of the very few individuals who have projected our image to the entire word. Christine Wing of the Ford Foundation of America in a tribute to late prof. Ake had this to say “ … I found his intelligence, vision and commitment to the Africas people to be extraorindiary … and I am acutely aware that his loss is felt not just through Nigeria and Africa, but throughout the world.”

The Obafemi Awolowo Foundation in its own tribute described Prof. Ake as “ … a man of truth, and indisputable globally acclaimed genius … and most certainly, one of the most committed advocates and architect of a truly great Nigeria.”

And W. Natztger WIDER said about Prof. Ake’s death, “Africa has lost its most insightful Political Economist, a scholar who spoke critically and prophetically to those elites who use power capriciously and in a repressive way.”

Claude Ake was born on 18th February 1939 at Omoku, in Ogba-Egbema­Ndoni Local Government Area of Rivers State. His intellectual capacity was exposed at Saint Michael’s (Ang.) School, Omoku. While his class mates were moving from standard five to standard six, he passed the common entrance examination to the prestigious Kings College, Lagos from standard five. At Kings College he passed the Cambridge school certificate with distinction and earned a scholarship to study Economics at the University College (Ibadan) an affiliate of the University of London.

Claude Ake graduated in 1962 with a first class honours and proceeded to the Great Columbia University, New York, where he obtained a Ph.D degree in Political Theory and Political Economy in 1968.

From here he opted for teaching and educating humanity. Claude Ake had a rich and versatile teaching experience, starting from his Alma mater, Columbia University, New York, where he was Assistant Professor from 1966 to 1968. He also taught at Carloton University, Canada and the Universities of Nairobi and Dares Salaem.

Prof. Ake was a Visiting Fellow at Oxford University (UK) 1981-1983 and at Cambridge University (UK) 1984, visiting Professor at Yale University, United States.

Prof. Ake published numerous scholarly articles in leading journals of both Economics and Political Science spread across the six continents of the world. Some of his publications include, a Theory of Political Integration, 1967, Revolutionary Pressures in Africa, 1978, Social Science as Imperialism, 1979, and a Political Economy of Africa. This very publication was simultaneously published by Longman in London and New York in 1981 and it was declared the Best Text book in United State of America in 1981. (Book of the Year list of Choice).

It is pertinent at this junction to quo e some statements made by Prof. Ake some 15 years ago. They reflect what we are witnessing in the world today.

“Like everyone else, I am saddened by the present turn of our politics. Differences look increasingly irreconcilable with each passing day, the rhetoric is more strident, the postures more belligerent. More ominous still, the people are voting with their feet in a surge of states of origin signaling a defacto partition of Nigeria. The political parties contributed richly to the present crisis by collaborating opportunistically in an implausible and undemocratic transition programme. Even now, it will be very surprising of the opportunism if the political class does not lead them to betray the people once more ….

“I resent these tiresome appeals to us ordinary Nigerians to be reasonable law-abiding, and patriotic as if we are these problem. Those who have so irresponsibly and unnecessarily brought the country to the brink should own up and back off. This is the only path of honour and the one real hope for all of us.”

“The experience of this decade has shown that any form of Government which cannot eradicate hunger and severe deprivation cannot avoid violence and cannot survive. Similarly, no peaceful and secure world is going to be possible without solving the problem of uneven development and the poverty of much at the world’s population ….. if the new world order is to be an improvement on its predecessor, it has to place the highest, priority on democra-cy and even development.

The New World Order 1994

“The development project has not failed in Africa. It just never started in the first place due to hostile political conditions. It can start and it can succeed. The disasters of the past have been useful lessons, awareness is developing and objective conditions in the world make self reliance increasingly inevitable and desirable … “

Democracy and Development in Africa 1996.

That a former President of Bostwana, His Excellency Festus Mogai accepted to be one of the quest speakers at the inaugural lecture in memory of the late Professor shows that he and his country greatly cherish the seeds which Prof. Ake sowed through rigorous intellectual analysis of the African problems. Festus Mogai is not the only African leader missing Prof. Claude Ake.

For instance, once President Museveni of Uganda sees a Nigerian, he would like to discuss Prof. Ake “ I was Prof. Ake’s student, his death is a monumental loss to Africa” says President Museveni.

Ake was indeed a scholar per excellence, he was indeed an Academic Ambassador of the Black Race, he was indeed globally acclaimed genius. But he was indeed more acknowledged abroad that at home.

The chairman of the inaugural committee for the memorial lecture who is the States Commissioner for Budget and Economic Planning, Hon. Charles Gogo-Levi said – “naming a monument after the late Prof. would be a decision to be taken by the Governor as the present administration was sensitive to the yearings of the people .. “

And in the words of the Commissioner of Information and communitications, Mrs. Ibim Semenitari, “this was the first time any Government from the region was recognising the late intellectual icon.”

It is kudos to the Rivers State Government for realising that this is worth doing even though it is coming 15 long years after his death.

Rivers State Government under His Excellency, Honourable Chibuike Amaechi and indeed the Federal Government of Nigeria, under His Excellency, Dr. Goodluck Jonathan both former students of University of Port Harcourt where late Prof. Claude Ake was Dean of the Faculty of Social Science own his great spirit an appropriate memorial. And the time for Nigeria to pay is now.

Even the various Local Government Areas in Nigeria own Prof. Ake because outside the Ivory Tower, Claude Ake demonstrated the highest integrity, patriotism, sincerity and dedication to the cause of the common man with whom he fully identified himself.

Sir Ichoku, a former director with Rivers State Ministry of Information & Communications, writes from Port Harcourt.

Anthony Ichoku

Continue Reading

Opinion

Trans-Kalabari  Road:  Work In Progress 

Published

on

Quote:”This Dream project  is one of  the best things that have happened  to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas in recent times.”
This is the concluding part of this story featured in our last edition.
Good road network helps farmers to convey their agro-allied products to  commercial hubs where buyers and sellers meet periodically to transact business. Road network engineers and motivates people resident in unfriendly geographical terrains, like riverine areas,  to own property and shuttle home with ease. Some people will prefer living in their own houses in a more serene and nature-blessed communities to living in the city that is fraught with  pollution, and other environmental, social and economic hazards. Prior to the cult epidemic that ravaged parts of Rivers State, the Emohuas, Elemes, Ogonis, and Etches were known for rural dwelling. Most public servants from these areas do their official and private transactions from  their villages. For them it was comparatively easier to live in the village and engage in a diversified economic endeavours through farming, fishing or other lucrative business without outrageous charges and embarrassment associated with doing business in Port Harcourt, where land is as scarce as the traditional needle.
That is why the decision to construct the Trans-Kalabari Road by the administration of Dr. Peter Odili was one of the best decisions that administration took. When Dr. Odili vacated office as the Rivers State Governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi took over and awarded contracts for continuation of the road project which in my considered view is the felt need of  the people of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. Unfortunately, Rt. Hon. Amaechi’s efforts to drive the project was sabotaged by some contractors some of whom are Kalabari people. The main  Trans-Kalabari Road is one project that is dear to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas of Rivers State. This is because through the road commuters can easily access several communities in the three local government areas. For instance, the road when completed will enable access to eight of the ten communities in Degema Local Government Area,  namely: Bukuma, Tombia,  Bakana, Oguruama, Obuama, Usokun, Degema town  and the Degema Consulate. It will also link 15 of the 16 communities in Asari Toru Local Government Area. The communities are: Buguma, the local government headquarters, Ido, Abalama, Tema, Sama, Okpo, Ilelema, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama, Krakrama, Omekwe-Ama, Angulama. The road will also connect  14  of 17 wards in Akuku Toru Local Government Area, and other settlements. It is interesting to note that It is faster,  and far more convenient and economical for the catchment Communities on the Trans-Kalabari Road network to go to the State Capital than the East West Road.  The people of the three local government areas will prefer  to work or do their transactions in Port Harcourt from their respective communities to staying in Port Harcourt where the house rent and the general cost of living is astronomically high.
 Consequently, development will seamlessly spread to the 28 out of 34 communities of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. The only Communities that are not linked by the road project are Oporoama in Asari Toru,  the Ke and  Bille Communities in Degema Local Government Area and the “Oceania” communities of Abissa, Kula, Soku, Idama, Elem Sangama of Akuku Toru Local Government Area. But because of the economic value of the unlinked Communities to Nigeria, (they produce substantial oil and gas in the area), the Federal, State Governments and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), can extend the road network to those areas just as Bonny is linked to Port Harcourt and the Lagos Mainland Bridge is connecting several towns in Lagos and neighbouring States.Kudos to previous administrations who  had constructed the Central Group axis.
 However, what is said to be the First Phase of the Trans-Kalabari Road project is actually a linkage of the “Central Group” Communities which consists of Krakrama, Angulama, Omekwe. Ama, Omekwe Tari Ama, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama. It is the peripheral of the Trans-Kalabari Road. The completion of the  Main Trans Kalabari project will free Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor areas from congestion. It will motivate residents and people of the three local areas to contribute to the development of their Communities. If the Ogonis, Etches, Emohuas, Oyigbos, Okrikas, Elemes can feel comfortable doing business in Port Harcourt from home, residents and people whose communities are linked to Port Harcourt through the Trans-Kalabari Road will no doubt, do likewise. The vast arable virgin land of the Bukuma people can be open for development and sustainable agricultural ventures by Local, State and Federal Government.
It is necessary to recall that the Bukuma community was host to the Federal Government’s Graduate Farmers’ Scheme and the Rivers State Government moribund School-to-Land Scheme under Governor Fidelis Oyakhilome. Bukuma was the only community in Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas that has the capacity to carry those agricultural programmes. However the lack of road to transport farm produce to Port Harcourt and facilitate the movement of the beneficiaries of the scheme who lived in the community which is several miles away from the farms, hampered the sustainability of the programme. The main Trans-Kalabari Road remains the best gift to the people of Degema, Asari Toru, and Akuku-Toru Local Government Areas. Kudos to Sir Siminilayi Fubara.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Continue Reading

Opinion

That  U.S. Capture of Maduro

Published

on

Quote:”Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction.”
The first part of this story was published in our last edition.
 
In Africa and the Middle East, regime change—whether by invasion, proxy warfare, or sanctions—has often left behind fractured states, weakened institutions, and prolonged instability. Washington’s motivations in Venezuela are widely understood: vast oil reserves, alliances with U.S. rivals, and symbolic defiance of American influence in the Western Hemisphere. But none of these reasons confer legal or moral legitimacy. Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction. If every powerful nation acted on its grievances in this manner, global chaos would inevitably follow. International law provides mechanisms for accountability. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), individuals accused of crimes against humanity or other grave offences are subject to investigation and prosecution through judicial processes.
Likewise, extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements, and Interpol mechanisms exist to ensure accountability while respecting due process. These frameworks were designed precisely to prevent unilateral enforcement of “justice” by military force. The most profound consequence of America’s action may not be in Caracas, but in the precedent it sets. If the world accepts that a superpower can unilaterally depose another country’s president, then the foundation of the international system is weakened. Sovereignty becomes conditional—no longer a right, but a privilege tolerated at the discretion of the powerful. Going forward, if another country invades its neighbour, will the United States retain the moral authority to impose sanctions or demand restraint? Some analysts already warn that parallels between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and America’s conduct in Venezuela risk further eroding global norms. Selective adherence to international law breeds cynicism and accelerates the drift toward a world governed by force rather than rules.
Power—military, economic, or political—should serve human progress and collective well-being, not domination and destruction. For African nations, many of which emerged from colonial rule through bitter struggle, this precedent is especially alarming. Sovereignty is not an abstract legal concept; it is a hard-won shield against external domination. Any erosion of that principle anywhere weakens it everywhere. Africa’s painful history of foreign interference makes this lesson especially urgent.  For me, the real issue is not whether Nicolás Maduro is a good or bad leader. That judgment belongs, first and foremost, to the Venezuelan people. The larger issue is whether the international system still operates on law—or has quietly reverted to hierarchy. If America insists it is defending global order, it must ask itself a difficult question: can an order survive when its most powerful guardian feels entitled to violate it? Until that question is answered honestly, the capture of a foreign president will remain not a triumph of justice, but a troubling symbol of a world drifting from law toward force.
If the United States felt so strongly about the allegations of terrorism, drug trafficking  against Maduro, were there no other lawful options? Judicial accountability, diplomacy, regional mediation, and multilateral pressure may be slow and imperfect, but they reflect respect for international law and sovereign equality. Military seizure is a blunt instrument. It humiliates institutions, radicalizes populations, and hardens resistance. It may remove a leader, but it rarely resolves the underlying crisis. History teaches that military interventions seldom result in stable democratic outcomes. More often, they breed resentment, resistance, and long-term instability. For the sake of global order and the rule of law, the United States should reconsider this path and recommit to diplomacy, legal cooperation, and respect for the sovereign equality of states. Former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly described the invasion of Venezuela as “unlawful and unwise,” warning that such actions “do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable.” Her words reflect a growing recognition, even within the United States, that force without legitimacy undermines both moral authority and global stability.
Should what happened in Venezuela serve as a wake-up call for corrupt African leaders who undermine the people’s right to choose their leaders? The answer is yes. The capture of Maduro should alarm African leaders who manipulate elections, weaken institutions, suppress opposition, undermine citizens’ rights, or cling to power at all costs. Venezuela faced widespread criticism over disputed elections and repression long before this episode, and that context shaped how the world reacted. This does not justify foreign military intervention, but it highlights an uncomfortable truth: prolonged democratic decay isolates nations and invites external pressure—from sanctions to diplomatic censure. Global opinion matters, and legitimacy at home strengthens sovereignty abroad. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and several African leaders have rightly condemned the events in Venezuela, invoking the principles of sovereignty and non-interference enshrined in international and regional law.
Beyond condemnation, however, African leaders must look inward. The continent’s future cannot be built on repression, constitutional manipulation, and personal greed. Leadership must reflect the will of the people, not desperation for power. Two days ago, a social commentator on a radio station argued that Trump’s action—though condemnable—demonstrates how far a leader can go for his country’s interest. According to this view, he did not intervene in Venezuela for personal enrichment, but to strengthen his nation. In stark contrast, many African leaders plunder their own countries. They siphon public resources, impose crushing taxes and harmful policies, and leave their citizens poorer—all for selfish gain. That contradiction is the deeper lesson Africa must confront.True sovereignty is protected not only by international law, but by accountable leadership at home.
 By:  Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

on

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Trending