Opinion
Journalists As Endangered Specie
Happiness has many roots, but none more important than security”. These words of the ancient philosopher, E.R. Stettinius Junior are still as relevant today as they were centuries ago when they were spoken.
The porous security situation in our country was once again rekindled on Sunday, 11th July, 2010 when four journalists were kidnapped in Abia State, South-East Nigeria. The four journalists were returning from a National Executive Council (NEC) meeting of the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ) in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, South-South Nigeria.
The kidnap of these men, no doubt, was a big blow to the journalism profession and indeed Nigeria.
This brings to reckoning the proliferation of the spate of kidnapping. Besides, it goes a long way to confirm the assertion that kidnapping has sadly become a permanent feature of our modern society.
For some time now, perpetrators of the vile crime of kidnapping have mindlessly unleashed humiliation on their victims which cut across different strata of our society.
While we admit that crime is an age-long social anathema, it is worth mentioning that the introduction of kidnapping and its continued practice is anti-development.
It may be argued that kidnapping is not news any longer in Nigeria considering its frequent occurrence in the nooks and crannies of the country. Equally, it may be argued that the calibre of people involved are sometimes the highly placed in society.
Whatever the arguments may be in all quarters, kidnapping is inhuman and should be strongly condemned in all ramifications.
The use of force, supported by arms to subject innocent citizens to untold hardship and sufferings is a flagrant violation of our fundamental human rights to security.
The four journalists, who temporarily lost their freedom, and were kept captive for a week, were absolutely innocent. Perhaps, their only crime was attending a conference in Uyo, and using Abia State as a transit point.
It is not debateable the plight of the pen soldiers for the seven days spent in their captors’ dungeon.
While the hoodlums were busy making shylock demands, and condemnations kept pouring on the act, the captives were counting their physical, mental and psychological trauma.
It is an undeniable truth that these perpetrators and their collaborators are Nigerians who live in Nigeria and share lots of values in common.
Beneath what they profess, they suddenly turn to career criminals who eke out a living through illegal, immoral, inhuman and unacceptable means.
The mere choice of targeting journalists this time as their potential victims underscores the fact that journalists as professionals are still treated as endangered specie in Nigeria.
Recently, it was revealed during the celebration of this year’s World Press Freedom Day, that 42 journalists were killed in few months.
All these are happening at the heels of the unresolved gruesome murder of the judicial correspondent of The Nation Newspaper, Mr. Edo Ugbagwu in his Lagos residence.
According to a London-based NGO, World Association of Newspaper and News Publishers (WAN-IFRA), Nigeria ranks among dangerous countries for journalists. This includes Mexico, Pakistan with Honduras as the deadliest.
The practice of journalism in Nigeria cannot be divorced from harassment, threats, attacks, kidnap, and ultimately, death.
The hazards of the profession are enough for the practitioners to contend with, without anybody making any unwanted and unwelcome dangerous input.
If political and economic injustices, unemployment, oppression and frustrations are anything to go by as reasons for kidnapping, therefore, it is a miscalculation to besiege journalists.
Journalists either influence a political or economic oppression nor aid and abeit the marginalisation of any vulnerable group. Rather, they champion noble human causes at various levels. If the kidnappers have any valid cause, they should see journalists as partners.
Our security agencies must rise up to the challenge of kidnapping which has become a national embarrassment. Few miscreants cannot be allowed to hold the entire society to ransom. It is the constitutional responsibility of government at all levels to provide security for her citizens. It is in secured environment that freedom can be guaranteed. As E.E. Hutchinson once wrote: Security is the priceless product of freedom. Only in freedom can men produce those material resources which can secure them from want at home and against aggression from abroad”. Today in Nigeria, no one and no place is safe. We all live with attacks and possibly death.
The most certain test by which we judge whether a country is really free and democratic is the amount of security enjoyed by her citizens. The veil of insecurity in our country, especially in some geo-political zones is gradually building to the one James Byrnes envisaged when he wrote: “Too many people are thinking of security, instead of opportunity.”
Kidnapping remains an ill wind which blows no one any good. It impacts negatively on our growing and fragile economy. This is in addition to increasing security votes to the detriment of tax payers money. No economy grows without foreign investments and no foreign investment flows in the midst of kidnapping and other corrupt practices. We must compel perpetrators to repent for our overall interest.
They should be educated on the psychological torture and trauma they subject their victims and their families.
They should be sensitised on the reputation problem they create for their families, states, geo-political zones and country in general. They must not forget that each person kidnapped, hundreds of thousands of people are thrown into agony and mourning. A kidnapper is no less than a suicide bomber who wastes his life, potentials and those of innocent citizens.
To kidnap a news hunter and asks for ransom is sheer wickedness. Indeed, it means making news on a negative note.
A journalist informs, educates and entertains. These are essential services for every member of the society. They are neither money-bags nor business moguls. To kidnap a journalist is to withhold the pen.
While we bask in the euphoria of those liberated from the shackles of captivity, the questions on many lips are numerous: Who is the next victim? Are our leaders gambling with security? When shall we enjoy a kidnap-free Nigeria?
Agi resides in Port Harcourt.
Friday Agi
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers2 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News2 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics2 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured2 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News2 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro2 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News2 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News2 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
