Connect with us

Oil & Energy

Nigeria And Politics Of Oil Blocks’ Allocation

Published

on

The distribution of assets, income, revenue opportunities and projects among the federating units that form the Nigerian state has remained the central focus of discourse in the country, in recent times. There has been a renewed clamour for increase in the level of equity in access to productive assets and distribution of the proceeds of production.
With Nigeria anchoring all budgetary revenue on the accruable proceeds from oil exploration from the Niger Delta, there are expectations of a commensurate economic development in the region to justify the huge sacrifice. However, the Niger Delta, nay Nigeria, is caught in the web of fundamental contradictions, linking global oil politics, that oil is mostly located in parts of the world different from where it is desperately needed.
This accounts for why the rustic Niger Delta communities from which oil is extracted rarely have access to it. Rather, the predominant feature of the Niger Delta has been unremitting pollution of the natural environment, agitation and conflicts. Thus, the Niger Delta has remained comparatively irrelevant in the main activity of wealth creation as a result of inactivity in oil production.
It is in contention of these sad realities that the recent disclosure by the Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Timpre Sylva, a Niger Delta son, that the Federal Government would conduct fresh oil block bid in 2020 has continued to generate reactions among critical stakeholders. While many applaud the decision as a bulwark to the development of the Nigeria oil and gas sector, others consider the decision as belated, given the fact that many oil blocks in the country have remained forlorn, while the ones mostly allocated were done based on vested interests and political patronage.
Pundits, therefore attributed the stunt in oil production and revenue generation in the country to these snags and imbalances in the allocation of oil blocks.
Although, the minister did not disclose the oil acreages that would be put out in the expected rounds, or processes to be adopted, he explained that the decision was not only to increase oil revenue but to also expand the space in the oil and gas sector by getting more people involved in the industry.
In apparent reaction to the planned oil blocks bid by the Federal Government, some stakeholders in the Niger Delta have advised the Federal Government to use the opportunity to address what they refer to as conspicuous denial of rights of indigenes of the oil rich region to own oil blocks.
A group known as Host Communities of Nigeria Producing Oil and Gas (HOSTCOM) in a reaction, cautioned against a repetition of the skewed processes that characterised previous allocation of oil blocks in the country, particularly during the military era, which it noted, “undermined the principles of due process and competitive bidding”.
National chairman of HOSTCOM, Dr Mike Emuh, who spoke with The Tide in an interview, said the Federal Government should allocate oil blocks to indigenes of the Niger Delta in the next rounds of bidding, to assuage the injustices and the brunts of oil politics which the people have suffered over the years.
He said: “despite the huge sacrifices the Niger Delta has made in the development of the Nigerian economy through their natural resources, the region still wallows in gross poverty and underdevelopment. The people of the Niger Delta are denied participation in the oil and gas sector through denial of oil blocks ownership, this negates the principles of natural justice. I am using the opportunity to call on the Federal Government to allocate oil blocks to the people of the Niger Delta as part of measures to address issues of under-development in the Niger Delta”.
Another stakeholder in the oil and gas sector and indigene of the Niger Delta, Comrade Inimgba told The Tide that the new bidding process should be able to address the anomalies in the allocation of oil blocks in the past.
He recalled that oil blocks allocation under the military era was not representative of the collective interest of all Nigerians because of the centralised command and discretionary system.
Inimgba, who is the chairman of the Port Harcourt branch of the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association (IPMAN), said discretionary system of allocation of oil blocks amounted to the concession of the nation’s treasures and common wealth to few individuals.
He said: “The politics of oil blocks allocation in Nigeria has been highly contentious as it has not reflected the principle of equity and justice. Most of the people that benefited from the allocation in the past got their allocations on share compromise at the expense of other Nigerians, particularly the Niger Deltans. The idea that the people of the Niger Delta are not technically fit or experienced enough to play key roles in the oil and gas sector is totally erroneous and deceitful”.
He added that the Niger Delta has people who are qualified technically and otherwise to operate oil blocks.
In her views, an activist, Ann Kio Briggs, also raised concern over the injustices perpetrated against the Niger Delta in oil politics.
She said that the Niger Delta had always been at the receiving end of the oil economy, as the dorminant activities of oil production are carried out in the region, noting however, that the indigenes play barely, “passive roles while billions of petrol dollars are carted away from their land to develop other parts of the country”.
She pointed out that such politics of “exploitation, deprivation and exclusion” amounted to gross injustice and urged the Federal Government to give due consideration to the Niger Delta in the planned allocation of oil blocks.
Also in a reaction to the planned allocation of oil blocks by the federal government, human rights activist and fiery lawyer, Femi Falana (SAN), said it was unconstitutional to allocate the nation’s oil blocks to a few individuals.
Quoting section 16(2)(c) of the 1999 constitution as amended, Falana in a letter to the presidency said the constitution prohibited the concentration of wealth in the hands of few individuals or group.
He noted that majority of the owners of the oil blocks belonging to the Nigeria people usually sublease them to offshore companies as they lack the fund and technical expertise to develop the oil and gas industry, and called for the revocation of such oil blocks and marginal fields.
The letter which read in part stated: “By merely collecting huge rents, the oil blocks owners become stupendously rich, while the federal, state and local governments, depend on loans and bail outs to pay salaries and carry out basic infrastructural development”.
Also, former Minister of State for Petroleum, Ibe Kachikwu, while speaking at the Nigeria oil and gas fair in Yenegoa, early this year, lamented that crude oil production in the country had been hovering around 1.9 million barrel per day over the past years.
Kachikwu noted that despite been a major oil producing country, Nigeria was yet to lead investors and producers that are operating across Africa, and emphasised the need for the country to explore its capacity to produce four million bpd of crude oil and abundant gas reserves to generate power.
Report shows that more than 50% of Nigeria’s oil and gas blocks remain untapped even as crude oil production continues to hover around 1.9 million bpd. Out of 390 oil blocks in the country, 211 are reported to be lying untapped due to non allocation by the Federal Government.
With many other countries are increasing efforts to ramp up their oil and gas production and reserves, industry experts have expressed concern over the lack of oil licensing rounds in Nigeria since 2008.
According to the institutional regulator of the petroleum industry, the Department of Petroleum Resources, (DPR), 179 blocks have been allocated as at December 2017, comprising 111 oil mining leases and 68 oil prospecting licenses.
It could be recalled that previous efforts to hold licensing rounds for major and marginal oil fields during the tenure of Dr Ibe Kachikwu as Minister of State for Petroleum Resources were not successful, as the recommendations were reportedly turned down by President Buhari.
Nigerians, however, look up to the planned allocation of oil blocks by the Federal Government in 2020 as an opportunity to address perceived imbalances in the oil economy.

 

Taneh Beemene

Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

Global Coal Consumption Hits Record Even As Coal Power Declines

Published

on

Global coal consumption reached another record in 2025, seemingly contradicting years of discussion about phasing out the world’s most carbon-intensive fossil fuel.
But the headline number does not tell the whole story.
The latest Statistical Review of World Energy shows that global coal consumption rose to 166.0 exajoules last year. That represented an increase of 0.7% from 2024.
At the same time, global electricity generation from coal declined. Coal-fired power production fell 0.3% to 10,511 terawatt-hours.
Those two trends are not mutually exclusive. Coal is used not only to generate electricity, but also in steelmaking, cement production, and other industrial processes. The divergence also reflects a changing geographic picture in which coal is declining across much of the developed world while remaining deeply embedded in Asia’s industrial economy.
A Record With Important Qualifications
Coal consumption reached a record in absolute terms, but it did not keep pace with overall energy demand.
Total global energy supply increased from 592.2 exajoules in 2024 to 600.3 exajoules in 2025, an increase of about 1.4%. Coal grew more slowly, so its share of the global energy mix slipped from 27.9% to 27.7%. Thus, despite the global record in coal consumption, coal lost a small amount of market share.
This pattern appears frequently during energy transitions. A fuel can continue growing in absolute terms even as faster-growing alternatives reduce its share of the total. With global energy demand still rising, losing market share does not necessarily mean declining consumption.
Renewable energy provides a relevant comparison. Renewable energy supply increased by nearly 10% in 2025, far outpacing coal. But the world’s appetite for energy was large enough to accommodate growth in renewables and another record for coal at the same time.
Coal Is Increasingly an Asian Fuel
The most striking feature of the coal market is its geographic concentration.
Asia Pacific consumed 138.1 exajoules of coal in 2025, accounting for 83.2% of the global total. China alone consumed 92.2 exajoules, or 55.6% of all the coal used in the world.
India contributed another 23.1 exajoules, representing 13.9% of global consumption. Together, China and India accounted for almost 70% of the world’s coal use. Add Indonesia, and the three countries consumed nearly 73% of the total.
This is why broad statements about a global coal phaseout can be misleading. Coal may be steadily retreating in Europe and North America, but its future is increasingly being determined in Asia.
Non-OECD countries accounted for 85.2% of global coal consumption in 2025. Their coal use has grown at an average annual rate of 1.9% over the past decade. OECD consumption, by contrast, has declined at an annual rate of 4.8%.
Europe consumed just 4.4% of the world’s coal last year. The European Union’s share was only 2.8%, following another 3.2% decline in consumption.
The global total therefore combines two very different stories. One is a long-term retreat from coal across much of the developed world. The other is coal’s continued importance to the large and growing economies of Asia.
One surprise in the 2025 data is that coal-fired electricity generation declined even as total coal consumption increased.
China generated 5,756 terawatt-hours of electricity from coal, down 1.1% from 2024. India’s coal generation fell 3.0% to 1,464 terawatt-hours. Since those two countries produce nearly 69% of the world’s coal-fired electricity, relatively small percentage declines can have a large effect on the global total.
Coal generation across Asia Pacific declined 1.2%, while Europe posted another 3.4% decrease. The European Union’s coal generation fell 3.6% and accounted for only 2.6% of the global total.
The divergence between consumption and power generation indicates that coal demand outside the electric power sector helped support the record. Coal consumption statistics include industrial uses that are not captured by electricity-generation totals. Changes in plant efficiency, coal quality, inventories, and measurement can also prevent the two series from moving in perfect alignment.
Whatever the precise combination, the result is notable. The world consumed a record amount of coal while producing less electricity from it.
The United States broke sharply with the broader developed-world trend in 2025.
U.S. coal consumption rose 10.4% to 8.7 exajoules. Coal-fired electricity generation jumped 13.1% to 804 terawatt-hours, while domestic coal production increased 4.4%.
In absolute terms, the increase in U.S. coal consumption was larger than the net increase for the entire world. U.S. consumption rose by about 0.8 exajoules, while the global total increased by roughly 0.7 exajoules. Declines in several other countries offset part of the American increase.
Still, this should not be mistaken for a return to coal’s former dominance in the United States.
U.S. coal consumption remains about 62% below its 2005 peak. Coal-fired generation is approximately 63% below its 2007 high, and production is about 54% below its 1998 peak.
The 2025 increase was substantial, but it occurred within a long-term structural decline. The United States still accounted for just 5.3% of global coal consumption and 7.7% of global coal-fired generation.
Global coal production remained near record levels at 180.8 exajoules, but it was essentially flat in 2025.
China increased production by 1.7% and supplied 52.4% of the world total. Its coal consumption was nearly unchanged, but its imports fell 10.1%. The combination suggests that increased domestic production displaced a meaningful amount of imported coal.
That shift helped push global coal trade down 3.1% to 35.3 exajoules. Indonesia, the world’s largest exporter, saw exports fall 7.4%. U.S. exports declined 11.5%, while Colombian exports plunged 21.3%.
Thus, record global consumption did not translate into record international trade. Much of the world’s coal is produced and consumed within the same countries, especially China and India.
The 2025 data support neither the claim that coal is disappearing nor the claim that the energy transition has stopped.
Coal use reached a record, but its share of global energy declined. Coal-fired electricity generation fell, but industrial and other uses kept total consumption elevated. Coal rebounded sharply in the United States but remained far below its historical peak. Europe continued to move away from coal, while Asia accounted for more than four-fifths of global demand.
The coal market is no longer one unified global story. It is a widening divide between countries that are steadily reducing their dependence on coal and countries where it remains central to electricity, industry, and economic development.
That divide is likely to continue defining the coal market for many years.
By Robert Rapier
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

FG To Stop Electricity Subsidy Payments From 2027

Published

on

The Federal Government has announced plans to end electricity subsidy payments from 2027 as part of efforts to tackle mounting liabilities in the power sector.
 Minister of Power, Joseph Tegbe, disclosed this at a media interactive session , in Abuja, at the weekend.
Tegbe said  the Federal Government would phase out subsidies beginning from 2027, assuring Nigerians  the policy would not deprive citizens of the benefits currently enjoyed under the subsidy regime.
According to him, the proposed removal forms part of broader reforms aimed at ensuring the long-term sustainability of the electricity sector while tackling the financial challenges confronting the industry.
Tegbe explained that despite the planned subsidy withdrawal, there are no immediate plans to increase electricity tariffs, reassuring consumers that the government is not considering a tariff hike in the short term.
“The phase-out of electricity subsidies will begin from 2027. However, there are no immediate plans to increase electricity tariffs. Our goal is to build a commercially viable power sector while protecting vulnerable consumers.
“The Power Consumer Assistance Fund will play a critical role in cushioning the impact on vulnerable consumers as we implement these reforms,” the minister stated.
He pointed out that  implementation timeline and consumer protection measures would be unveiled as the reform process progresses, emphasizing that Nigeria’s electricity subsidy has remained a major fiscal burden.
Continue Reading

Oil & Energy

Firm unveils New Products For Oil Facilities 

Published

on

An oil servicing firm, Solewant Group, has unveiled protective coatings and paints to secure oil facilities.
The products, manufactured at its new plant, sited in Alode Eleme, Rivers State, comprise of paints and coating that aid durability of oil facilities.
The products included the Solguard Architectural Coatings range comprising emulsion, matt and silk paints; Solguard Industrial Protective Coatings, featuring red oxide metal primer and alkyd gloss enamel; Solguard Heavy-Duty Protective Systems, including zinc-rich epoxy primer, high-build epoxy coat and acrylic polyurethane; and the flagship Novaguard Premium Specialty Coatings, made up of 100 per cent solid epoxy, polyurethane and polyurea systems for heavy industrial applications.
Unveiling the paints, at the weekend, Minister of State for Petroleum Resources(Oil), Senator Heineken Lokpobiri, described the products as innovative and pledged  the federal government’s support  to indigenous companies.
Lokpobiri described Solewant’s products as milestone in Nigeria’s industrialisation drive and local content development.
“This is clear evidence of the growth, which shows that local service providers in Nigeria have developed over the past 15 years.
“I’m very happy today that I have the privilege to witness this plant that will not just service Nigeria, but will service the entire African continent”, the minister said.
Lokpobiri praised Solewant’s expansion into Namibia, saying it marked the beginning of broader opportunities for Nigerian companies across Africa’s energy sector.
“We are fully committed to supporting companies like Solewant Group. That is the only way we can grow this industry.
“The solution to Nigeria’s energy problem lies with Nigerians. Nobody will come from anywhere to solve our problems in Africa”, he said.
He noted that the company’s new manufacturing capability would help address one of Nigeria’s biggest oil production challenges by providing locally manufactured protective coating solutions for ageing pipelines.
“Our pipes are completely corroded, and we need solutions that Solewant is providing to address that problem. What you have done here is a Nigerian solution to the Nigerian problem”, he said.
Speaking at the occasion, Solewant Group Chief Executive Officer, Solomon Ewanehi, said the investment was driven by the vision of ending Nigeria’s dependence on imported industrial coatings while building globally competitive manufacturing capacity.
In his words, “today we are not just launching the Solewant Coating Manufacturing Plant. We are launching confidence; confidence that Nigeria has the competence, the capacity and the courage to manufacture not just what we consume but also what we can export to compete with international standards.”
Ewanehi explained that the company unveiled 11 enhanced coating products under the Solguard and Novaguard brands, developed and manufactured in Nigeria for the oil and gas, marine, infrastructure and industrial sectors.
“Sixteen years ago, we asked a simple question: Why should Nigeria, a leading oil and gas nation, continue to import the very coatings that protect our critical assets?
“Today, that vision has become steel, concrete, plant and people”, he stated.
According to him, the products were designed to deliver world-class corrosion protection for pipelines, offshore platforms, refineries, storage tanks, bridges, power plants and other critical infrastructure operating in harsh environments.
Also speaking,  Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Senator George Akume, described the project as “a powerful statement of confidence in Nigeria” and applauded Solewant for expanding local manufacturing despite ongoing economic reforms.
Represented by the his Special Adviser on Technical Matters, Prof Bolaji Babatunde, Akume said “your  decision to expand manufacturing capability, develop technology and create value within Nigeria is a commendable example of the kind of private sector leadership that the Federal Government seeks to encourage me”.
Rivers State Governor Siminalayi Fubara, represented by his Chief of Staff, Barr. Sunny Ewuhle, also commended the company for choosing Rivers State as its industrial base.
“We are calling on all local and foreign investors to emulate what Solewant Group has done in Rivers State,” he said, pledging the state’s support for manufacturing, local content development and industrial growth.
Namibia’s High Commissioner to Nigeria, H.E. Walde Natangwe Ndavishiya, described the investment as timely, saying Solewant was well positioned to support Namibia’s emerging oil and gas industry.
“I particularly commend Solewant Group for taking the bold step of establishing a branch office in Namibia. This demonstrates confidence in Namibia and its emerging opportunities,” he stated.
By: Kevin Nengia
Continue Reading

Trending