Opinion
Anti-Corruption: The Botswana Example
A trending video on the social media shows the former Director General of the Directorate of Intelligence and Security (DIS), Issac Kgosi, being arrested at the country’s international airport over alleged corruption charges. This action has elicited reactions from many Nigerians; some of who think Nigeria should tow the line of Botswana and be more sincere and practical with the fight against corruption.
In the past years, the Southern African country has been rated as the least corrupt country in Africa by Transparency International Corruption Perception Index. A feat achieved through concerted efforts of both the authorities and the people. Records have it that in the early 1990s, a series of high-level corruption scandals involving senior officials in the ruling Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) erupted in Botswana and caused public outrage. That led to the enactment of the Corruption and Economic Crime Act (CECA) in 1994, establishing the Directorate on Corruption and Economic Crime (DCEC). With the enormous powers and operational independence granted the agency, it has relentlessly carried out its duties, hinging mainly on investigation, prevention and public education. Both the low and the mighty, including members of the ruling party, are said not to be spared in the quest to rid the country of corruption. This has continued to give the country a clean record.
Juxtapose that with the anti graft war that has been going on in Nigeria since the creation of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in 2003 and you may know the reason why the fight is largely believed not to be making much impact. Instead of a holistic war against corruption, ours is selective. EFCC has been touted as a tool by the ruling party to haunt the opponents. While members of the ruling party are seen to be “saints”, those on the opposing side are termed corrupt. The loquacious National Chairman of the ruling party, APC, Adams Oshiomhole, alluded to that when at the party’s rally in Benin, Edo State, last month, he made what has become a famous speech that “…Yes, once you join the APC, your sins are forgiven”
Not too long ago, a video was released showing a sitting governor allegedly receiving bribes from a contractor. Up till now, the governor in question has not been chastised either by the EFCC or the Presidency. Even the state house of assembly that tried to carry out an investigation on the matter has been silenced with a court injunction by the accused. So the governor goes about seeking for re-election and promising President Muhammadu Buhari millions of votes from his state in the forth coming presidential election.
What about the grass cutting and fumigation scam in Aso Rock, the pensions reform case and other matters involving some high profile individuals in the country? For some time now, the media have been inundated with stories of corruption allegations leveled against some government functionaries and other highly placed individuals. What we do not hear in the long run is how these people are punished so as to serve as a deterrent to others yet we claim to be fighting corruption?
On the lower rung of the ladder the situation is not different. There is corruption everywhere; in the education, financial, medical, religious institutions and in the civil service. Contractors, students, lawyers, public servants, drivers and many others are daily involved in one form of corruption or the other. A social commentator once likened corruption in Nigeria to malignant cancer which has destroyed every part of a patient. No sector in Nigeria is corruption-free. The irony is that everybody in Nigeria talks about it, people condemn it yet almost everybody is guilty of it.
Yes, corruption is not peculiar to Nigeria. Every country has its own share of the evil. But the difference is that many of these countries are making concerted efforts to curtail it. What are we doing in Nigeria? Certainly, there is no way the nation will continue the way it has been carrying out the fight and expect things to get better.
Therefore, can we learn from Botswana and begin to educate the people on the dangers and repercussions of corruption? Can we focus more on measures to prevent corruption instead of investing the whole resources in chasing after offenders? Can our leaders mop up the political will to give the fight the needed push instead of constantly paying lip service to the matter? Fighting corruption in Nigeria requires action not words. Until serious efforts are made to tackle corruption, starting from the top, government will not be taken seriously.
There is also need for cooperation of all Nigerians in this important issue as it is obvious that government cannot do it alone. We need to re-orientate our values, laying less emphasis on materialism but more on honesty and strong moral values if we must rid our country of corruption.
Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers2 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News2 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics2 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured2 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News2 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro2 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News2 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News2 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
