Opinion
Pension Administrators Or Human Exploiters?
It is an undisputed fact that the management of pensioner’s investment in Nigeria is as old as Nigeria itself. This idea which was designed to cater for the welfare of the pensionable retired workers has rather subjected pensioners to unbearable agonies such that most of them have become beggars, always looking up to the government for a more positive managerial approach.
All the same, the pension fund was introduced by the colonial masters to provide income and security for old age-British citizens working in Nigeria upon retirement as post-retirement benefit.
The first Nigerian legislative instrument on pension matters was the Pension Ordinance of 1951. This however, had retrospective effect from 1st January, 1946.
Numerous other reforms have taken place such as the National Products Forum Scheme (NPFS-1961), Pension Fund Act 103 (1979), Police and Government Pension Act 75 (1987), Insurance Trust Fund (NSITF – 1993) and the Pension Reform Act 2004.
The idea of management of pension fund in Nigeria was designed to cater for the welfare of the pensionable retired workers. This had for long gained global recognition and acceptance.
Considering the above, you will agree with me that many pension reform acts have been put in place since independence, but the questions poping up are: Are these pension funds well managed? Are the investment owners (pensioners) happy the way their hard-earned income is being managed? Certainly Not!
The pensioners are rather agitating for liberty to withdraw their whole sum to operate the kind of investment they want on their own since the sum given to an average pensioner is not up to the investment the administrator makes on his/her capital.
Moreso, there has also been clear evidence that pension funds managed by different companies achieve different results, although all of them operate in the same market conditions. Therefore, the proven assumption is that the results achieved by the pension funds depend on how well they are managed or more specifically on whether all decisions taken by management are in favour of the funds participants.
Recently, ideas and methods of corporate governance were offered to be applied to pension fund management. This methodology was developed in order to ideal with the so-called “principal agent problem” when shareholders, due to their large numbers and different locations, cannot organise themselves and ensure that company’s managers work exclusively for shareholders, rather than for their own interests. It would rather not be acceptable to use the term “corporate management” for the management of pension funds as the pension fund and the company have same essential differences.
The pension fund as we know, can have hundreds of thousands, of participants living in different areas who do not even know each other and hence, unable to organise themselves in order to reach an over-all agreement and to represent it. Similarly, the pension funds managing companies are subjected to this kind of problem too, that is, how to align the interests of the pension funds participants and those of the pension managing company’s shareholders.
The implication is that, the pension fund can be influenced by many interest parties who have different or even contradicting interests, all of them trying to divert fund management decisions “towards their interest’, thereby playing down or disregarding the interest of the pensioners who own these funds.
On this note, it is necessary to protect the interest of the pensioners who are still alive because a lot of them die, on daily basis like chickens. Their outstanding statement or outcry is that “the pension manipulators should be stopped and they (pensioners) be given the liberty to either withdraw their full sum of money for the investment that suits their interest or should be given their desirable investment.
I salute the recent Senate move to give the pensioners a new breath of life as they took a positive step in the right direction to provide succour to retirees who face grave difficulties in withdrawing their savings. The move by the Senate to amend the Pension Reform Act 2014 to allow retirees have access to 75 percent of their retirement saving will certainly give the pensioners a sigh of relief. Most of them are dead, while the living among them are wallowing in abject poverty with nothing to show for after their years of faithful service to their fatherland.
I, therefore, charge the government to change the present pathetic situation of the pensioners. Practical efforts must be made by the government, otherwise, the pensioners will continue to languish in pain and poverty and the death rate will continue to rise.
Government must do everything to protect the interest of the pensioners by ensuring that the pensioners have full access to their funds for effective management by themselves.
Workers, whether in public or private sectors, are expected to live comfortable life devoid of any form of dependency after retirement from active service; Therefore, the Federal Government has a role to enact favourable laws to ensure that the pensioners have full access to their investment or fund to enable them live a better and purposeful life after retirement.
Udofia writes from Western Delta University.
Ima-Obong Udofia
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion3 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
News12 hours agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
Niger Delta11 hours ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Rivers10 hours ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education11 hours agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
News12 hours ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
Education11 hours agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News3 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
