Opinion
Civil Cases: What Roles For The Police?
Given the criminal excesses of some policemen in Nigeria, there is a need to call the attention of the police authorities to the involvement of the police at divisional or local levels in civil cases. The law commonly recognized and applicable nation-wide in Nigeria is divided into two sections, namely; criminal and civil cases. Unfortunately, many aggrieved persons who may not know the difference between the two sections of the law always run to the police to make complaints.
For clarity purpose, civil cases are usually resolved with an advice to the parties to seek personal redress in a civil court, not police stations. Civil cases include issues between landlords and tenants over rents, debt disputes, failed contract agreements and such other trespasses for which the aggrieved party can seek redress in a civil suit. But what we find becoming a common practice is a situation where the police get involved in clearly civil cases.
It is true that some cases can be both civil and criminal whose details may not be delved into here. It is true also that the police can intervene in some civil cases, where there is the possibility of the issue degenerating into an act of criminality or a breach of the peace.
The common strategy which must not be allowed to become a norm, is that some landlords and creditors who have “friends” and “consultants” in police circles, use them to settle personal or civil issues with their tenants or debtors. The game goes this way; you tell your police friend or consultant that your tenant or debtor is taking you for a ride, after several pleas. The police then make a case of conduct likely to cause a breach of peace, malicious damage or use Section 419 of the Criminal Code which deals with obtaining money, property, favour or other advantages by false pretences and fraudulent presentations.
Thus the helpless tenant or debtor would be detained in a police cell for issues that are civil rather than criminal in nature. Knowing that they are playing a game of intimidation, the police friend or consultant would make the “suspect” to sign a “bond to pay the debt and damages” at the police station within a time limit. The helpless fellow gets someone to take him on “bail” and finds where he would borrow some money to be able to get out of police net.
If the complainant and Investigating Police Officer (IPO) are benevolent, they would warn the suspect to make haste in settling the case, or he would remain in detention. Perhaps what would be made to appear as criminal aspect of an issue that is obviously civil, may be some exchange of bitter words in the process of a threatening demand by the landlord or creditor. Malicious damage may be some cracks or holes in a house that is long over-due for renovation. Thus a tenant faces two charges of conduct likely to cause a breach of the peace and malicious damage, just because, being laid off from job, he is unable to pay his rent.
While the IPO may know that he is merely engaged in a game of intimidating someone trapped in a financial obligation to someone else, he would find it hard to take the matter to court, or to detain the suspect for longer than 24 hours. It is possible that more complications may arise from a simple and obvious case of a civil nature. What lawyers would call agent provocateur is a situation where an individual is deliberately pushed to the wall, thereby forcing him to react in an obviously aggressive manner in self defence.
Many cases pending in police stations and many persons detained, awaiting trail, can be traced to minor civil cases which were bloated and transformed into criminal cases.
The situation in Nigeria is hard enough for everyone and it would be quite unfair to transfer personal plight and stress to other people, especially helpless ones. Neither should anyone holding a position of coercion use such power to intimidate others. Police patrol teams such as SAS usually engage in this act. And it is unfortunate.
Amirize writes from Port Harcourt.
email: bamirize @ yahoo.com
Bright Amirize
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers2 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News2 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics2 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured2 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News2 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro2 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News2 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News2 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
