Opinion
The Days Of The Shackles
I have always asked the question whether the President Muhammadu Buhari administration, which pledged compliance with the rule of law, truly has regard for the courts?
I do that routinely because of the many reported and substantiated cases of human rights abuses by the administration. They include illegal detentions, disobedience to court orders, indiscriminate arrests without proper investigation, among others.
At a press conference held in Abuja to commemorate the 2017 Democracy Day, the Nigeria Bar Association, NBA, chided the Federal Government for disparaging court orders and the rule of law. Its president, Mr. Abubakar Mahmoud, SAN, said the association was “appalled at the continued detention of certain individuals in blatant disobedience to court orders”.
The legal luminary said it all. Those at the butt of this rascality at the moment include the leader of an Islamic movement in Nigeria, Sheikh Ibrahim El-Zakyzaky and his wife; the former National Security Adviser, Col. Sambo Dasuki; Ifeanyi Uba and some judges.
Surprisingly for the regime, one of its own, who is the Chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption, Prof. Itse Sagay (SAN), also backed the NBA position and asked the Federal Government to obey court orders particularly in respect of Dasuki and El-Zakyzaky.
One appreciates the gravity of the charges against the detainees, but their continued detention is indefensible and contrary to express court orders. It is very important that the Federal Government obeys court orders at all times to preserve the society and protect the weak.
A situation where judges are kept for about eight months without being prosecuted or charged before any court of law is simply unacceptable and an affront on the constitution. If there are no charges against them, the appropriate thing to do is to discharge them and get them reabsorbed.
Take the case of Dasuki, for instance. He was arrested for allegedly misappropriating $2.1billion meant for procurement of military equipment. Since then, he has been in incarceration for almost two years while his case in court has been going back and forth.
He has been granted bail by three different trial courts which ordered his release. Also, on October 4, 2016, the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) court ordered his release but the Federal Government has not complied till date.
El-Zakyzaky’s matter is more pathetic or caustic. Even though the sheikh was absent at the scene of conflict between his Shi’ite sect and the military over allegations that the group prevented the Chief of Army Staff, Lieutenant-General Tukur Buratai, and his convoy from taking a route, he has been clamped in detention since then.
Justice Gabriel Kolawole of the Federal High Court, Abuja, saw the injustice suffered by the sheikh and his wife and declared their detention illegal and granted their realease. But that order has not been obeyed. Although it was learnt that the Federal Government appealed the ruling, lawyers would usually say that an appeal does not amount to a stay of execution until the court orders it.
The danger in the government’s intransigence, especially in respect of the sheikh and his wife, is better imagined than experienced. The nation risks a repeat of Mohammed Yusuf’s saga. Yusuf was the founder of Boko Haram, whose death in police custody escalated the deadly activities of the terrorist group. Since then, the nation is yet to have reprieve from the unrelenting bloodshed in the North East.
This government should be told that our laws don’t permit the detention of persons beyond a period of time without trial. The continued detention of these persons in defiance of court order casts aspersions on the administration and places huge question marks upon the character of the government.
Some Nigerians are pained by the actions of the administration in this regard and have expressed their displeasure.
A legal practitioner, Godwin Udofia, described President Buhari’s refusal to obey the court on the release of the detainees as sitting the constitution on the head. He urged the president to abide by the constitution he swore to uphold. Of course, I agree with Godwin.
Does the President realise that the constitution he despises is the very document that establishes the court and his office? By acting arbitrarily, Buhari must understand that he has suspended the constitution already, an act reminiscent of the military era.
It is, indeed, sad to see fellow Nigerians languish in detention in perpetuity at the pleasure of the President, the Attorney General or other persons. It seems we are gradually returning to the days of Decrees 2 and 4; the days of the shackles.
Arnold Alalibo
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion4 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
Niger Delta15 hours ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Rivers13 hours ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education14 hours agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Education14 hours agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News15 hours agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News15 hours ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News4 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
