Opinion
Can We Dance?
Dancing is as old as music itself. It has its root in the Bible long before the time of King David when the Israelites had Levites who danced as well as sang.
Dancing is synonymous with joy. It is a genuflection of body, mind and soul to the rhythm of pleasantries. It is a self-re-awakening of ecstasy, an expression of joyful mood. Apart from the usual dirge that occasionally accompanies the demise of kings and powerful monarchs in some parts of Africa, dancing is uniquely meant for joyful celebration.
If the above allegory is anything to go back, can we, as Nigerians, dance as we mark the 18th year anniversary of uninterrupted civil rule in our country?
The Democracy Day, as May 29 of every year has come to be known in Nigeria, is a day we set aside to celebrate the re-birth of our country that had long been held captive and prostrate by a cabal of military careerists and self-serving carpetbaggers. It, indeed, sounds a death knell for the rule of gun.
May 29 provides Nigeria a big leap forward towards self re-awakening. It will not be a bad idea, therefore, if we break into songs and dances, clink glasses of champagne or even perform the annual ritual of slapping each other’s backs, either on the streets or on the pages of newspapers, all in the name of celebrating the successful completion of the 18th gear of our forward march.
Before we switch into the 19th gear, however, we should ask ourselves certain heart-to-heart questions. How far and how well has Nigeria fared in the last 18 years? What have we achieved in concrete terms? Or shouldn’t we look back? And why should we look back?
These soul-searching questions are important to us as a nation to enable us project into the future.
As erudite Professor Femi Osofisan rightly noted in his foreword to a book, some years ago; “The past is certainly important, as a backdrop, to show us where we are coming from, and hence furnish us with a firm footing to confront the future. But the past is even more important as a mirror, to show us who we are in the present, and to bring us as well a reflection of who we are going to be in the future”.
Sadly, most Nigerians hate to look back. Late Chief Chukwuemeka Odimegwu Ojukwu was once quoted to have said that, if the Almighty wanted men to look back, it would not have been beyond Him to provide men with a pair of eyes at the back of the head.
The late Biafran General may be right. But in truth, a country that cannot look back cannot seriously look forward to its future, to paraphrase another scholarly mind, Dan Agbese.
To appreciate our forward march, therefore, we must ask ourselves the probing question that the former Republican Party candidate in the US Presidential election, Ronald Reagan asked the American voters during the 1980 campaign for the White House: “Are you better off today than four years ago?”
By way of emphasis, are Nigerians better off today than 18 years ago?
There is no doubt that the past 18 years of civilian rule have provided us the unique opportunity to walk free and even call our leaders names without the fear of Dracula fangs. Needless to say that Nigeria is no longer a Pariah that the international community dared to touch even with the longest pole.
And of course, the standard of living has taken some leap for-ward for few Nigerians who know the path to economic fortune, just as it has been a dream world for our politicians, most of whom have not recovered from the shock of the good fortunes that democracy has thrust on their laps.
It is perhaps from the hoipolloi and deluge of the scums of the earth who live out their lives in the laps of penury that you are likely to get an earful. And they are as many as the number of civil servants, unemployed youths, pensioners, street beggars and urchins who eke out a living on daily basis.
Nevertheless, Rome, they say, was not built in a day. Why then shall we dance not?
Even though, some of our leaders have taken us one step forward, two steps backward, or better still, making us oscillate around the circle; a handful of them deserves a pat on the back, for having the political heft to put smiles on people’s faces.
So, as we celebrate the 18th annual ritual of our fledgling democracy, shall we, therefore, rise up and dance to the rhythm of our forward march, if indeed there is any? Please, never say nay to dancing.
Boye Salau
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers5 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education5 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta5 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education5 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News5 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
Rivers18 hours ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News17 hours agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
News5 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
