Opinion
Enforcing Rivers UBE Law
A former British senior government official, Robin Cook, once said, “Education is more than a luxury; it is a responsibility that society owes itself”.
Similarly, the 15 years old Pakistani activist, Malala Yousafzai, who was shot by Taliban for advocating girl’s education lent her voice to the importance of education by saying, “let us pick up our books and pencils. They are our most powerful weapons”.
The remarks of the above two personalities identify two key stakeholders in the education industry – the government and the society comprising pupils or students and parents or guardians.
It follows that the government must be alive to its responsibility of providing basic education while the society must take advantage of the basic education to midwife a better future for the country.
This is where the Rivers State Universal Basic Education (RSUBE) Law Number 4 of 2005 readily comes to mind.
According to Section 1 of the law, every child of primary and junior secondary age in Rivers State is provided free and compulsory basic education, while Section 3 states that, “The compulsory free Universal Basic Education is for a period of nine years made up of six years of primary school and three years of junior secondary school education”.
For emphasis, Section 5 expressly states thus, “every parent shall ensure that his or her child attends and completes primary education and junior secondary school education by endeavouring to send the child to primary and junior secondary school”.
In other words, Section 5 expects every parent or guardian to secure a child’s registration at school and his or her regular attendance thereafter.
By way of ensuring compliance with the UBE law, Governor Nyesom Wike has stated unequivocally that basic education is free and therefore illegal fees would not be condoned in any public school in the state.
The Commissioner for Education, Professor Kaniye Ebeku and the Executive Chairman of Rivers SUBEB, Venerable Fyneface Ndubisi Akah, have warned that head teachers and principals caught charging and collecting illegal and unauthorized fees will face the wrath of the law.
Some school principals have already been suspended by the UBE Board for charging illegal and unauthorized fees.
The government’s efforts through the supervising Ministry of Education and the State UBE Board to monitor and check the head teachers and principals of public schools from taking undue advantage of unsuspecting parents and guardians is commendable. There is the need to sustain the tempo.
Meanwhile, the state Ministry of Education and state UBE board need to explain what constitutes chargeable services.
Available document at the state Ministry of Education shows that uniform, berge, file, prospectus, identity card, baret and school cardigan attract moderate charges. Other chargeable services include PTA, exam, environment, exact letters, weekly games and sports, as well as annual school sports fees.
It is the responsibility of SUBEB to carry out periodic public enlightenment on chargeable services and roles of parents and guardians to ensure compliance.
However, there is the need to ensure that all provisions of the law are enforced to enable citizens benefit from the spirit of the law. In other words, there is the need to extend the dragnet beyond suspending head teachers and principals of public schools. Defaulting parents and guardians must also face the wrath of the law.
For instance, Section 8 of the Rivers State UBE Law No. 4 of 2005 states thus; “Any parent or guardian who contravenes Section 5 or 6 of this law commits an offence and is liable on first conviction to be cautioned and discharged while on second conviction to a fine of N5000 or imprisonment for a term of one (1) month”.
The law goes further to add that on subsequent conviction, the offender is liable to a fine of N10,000 and or imprisonment for a term of two months.
To enforce the law, therefore, the Ministry of Education in collaboration with the state UBE board must synergize with the state Ministry of Justice to possibly create or establish a special court to try defaulting parents and guardians who violate the law.
This is because until defaulting parents are sanctioned by paying applicable fines or imprisoned as the case may be, the law will only remain in law books and libraries.
Without mincing words, defaulting parents and guardians must be made to face the full weight of the law for the impact of the law to be felt by Rivers people and Nigerians resident in the state.
Sika is a Port Harcourt based journalist.
Baridorn Sika
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion5 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
Education2 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Rivers2 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Niger Delta2 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education2 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News2 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News2 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News5 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
