Opinion
Why Pay High For Darkness?
The Nigerian
populace may not have taken to the streets and roads of the various state capitals in the nation to register their pleasure and delight over the recent court ruling on reversal to former electricity billing system, but it was obvious that it was one of the best news if not the only best Nigerians have been predisposed to in recent time.
The ruling by a federal high court in Ikoyi, Lagos, on Wednesday last week, which reversed the 45 per cent increase in electricity tariff, declared it illegal, and awarded a fifty thousand Naira (N50,000) cost against Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) over a charge of ‘Violation of the court’s interim order.’ This does not only reawaken Nigerians’ hope in the judiciary, it is like regaining a right once lost.
Although, the ruling did not go down well with the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) which claims that the judgment would constitute a setback to their supposed progress made so far in the electricity sector, for which a stay of execution and notice of appeal of the judgment have been filed by the commission, it can be considered a victory for the masses and a liberation of sort.
The Acting Chief Executive Officer of NERC, Dr Tony Akan, claims that a reversal of the current electricity tariff regime which became operational on February 1, 2016, would be tantamount to a reversal of the commercial foundation upon which contracts for gas, hydro, coal and solar feedstock for the production of electricity, have been predicated.
Meanwhile, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Electricity Distribution Company Plc, Mr Oladele Amoda, has expressed fears that enforcement of the court order may lead to over 10,000 jobs loss, leaving a negative impact on the power sector as investors would not just shy away from investing in the sector, international donors would also be discouraged from participating in the sector.
Apart from the threat for job loss, the electricity distribution companies also threatened to reintroduce fixed charges should they be compelled to go back to the status quo.
In fairness to both the consumers, producers and distributors of power or energy as the case may be, a little reflection on what was before the privatisation of the power sector by the Goodluck Jonathan administration would cause a sane mind to either hail or condemn the ruling by the Ikoyi Federal High Court against the new electricity tariff regime.
Nigerians were billed arbitrarily, yet living in darkness, businesses crumbled on daily basis as owners couldn’t afford to power their ventures while depending on daily purchase of petrol products. The privatization of the power sector in the heels of this awkward energy and power situation in the country, was to say the least, nothing short of a relief and so, a welcome development, which was recorded as a credit to the immediate past administration.
To Nigerians, it heralded the dawn of a new era in the power sector, a reason behind the proposed banning of smaller petrol engine power generators, believing that light has come hence no need for generators again.
Unfortunately, this great expectation has remained a day-dream. Rather than alleviating the plight of Nigerians, the enforcement of the 45% increase in electricity tariff without an accompanying power increase has subjected Nigerians to more hardship, as consumers who pay N2,000 at the old regime now pay between N12,000 and N13,500 with nothing to to show for it and once a customer is served the bill, he is left without a choice than to pay. What a slight on the dignity of the persons of Nigerians and an infringement on their right to the worth of their money?.
Embarrassingly too, bills are never compiled based on the reading of the metres. The months with fewer days, power supply always bears the highest cost irrespective of the intellectual attainment of the consumers. metre readings are done with impunity except where the consumer reaches a compromise with the meter reader.
However, anything worth doing at all, is worth doing well. In the words of the chairman of Nigeria Labolur Congress (NLC), Anambra State, Jerry Nnubia, “the court order restraining NERC and DISCOs from increasing tariff until right things are done is in tandem with natural justice”. No body ever feels happy at exploitation over services not rendered.
Therefore, let service delivery be enhanced, then the increase in tariff may be permissible. Otherwise, why should we pay high for darkness?
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion3 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
News3 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
-
News6 hours ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News6 hours agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
Featured3 days agoTinubu Jets To S’Arabia For Lesser Hajj …Unveils Free Healthcare For Pensioners
-
Niger Delta3 days ago
Police Rescue Woman, 24, From Online Dating Kidnappers … Arrest Five Suspects
-
Featured3 days ago2027: Be Politically Neutral, Fubara Tasks Traditional Rulers
-
News3 days ago
FG Approves King Amachree Airport In Rivers, Sets Conditions For Construction
