Editorial
That School Feeding Debate
Vice President, Yemi Osinbajo said last week
that government school feeding
programme would be enjoyed by 20 million children in Nigeria. Incidentally, the planned launch has attracted responses that should not be discountenanced.
According to Osinbajo, the one-meal-a-day for primary school children across Nigeria will help the local economies, improve school enrollments, boost the nutrition and health of children, create employment and market for local agricultural produces among others.
But how the programme will be funded presented the first problem. The Vice President said the N500 billion approved in the 2016 budget for social investment will be used to fund the programme. Incidentally, it is the same money budgeted to pay un-employed graduates (for how long) and create 1.14 million jobs.
While these issues need to be clarified, Governor Ayodele Fayose of Ekiti State says the Federal Government may have provided an excuse for the school feeding programme to fail when it factored in a 40 percent State counterpart funding. He stated categorically that his State has no money for the programme, even as the matter has not been discussed with the States.
Confusing as it may sound, Governor Fayose also noted that the school feeding programme was a promise of the All Progressives Congress (APC) and should be wholly funded by the Federal Government which benefitted from the votes given on that account. On the other hand, he suggests that APC States could go ahead with it without imposing it on others.
Added to the several other responses, especially against the programme, government should find a way of confirming if Nigerians truly want that programme. Besides, should all the States be compelled to participate in the programme even when Nigeria is not under a command system.
The point must be made that while the programme may be suitable for some States, especially the rural setting; cultures that do not accord with the ‘Almajiri’ system cannot support it. In fact, many States that started it dropped the idea long ago without any external reason to do so.
The Tide shares the concern of government over dwindling school enrollment and rising school drop-outs in some States and the average health profile of the Nigerian child, but whether the one-meal-a-day for a handful of children is the panacea remains a puzzle. If government is quick to feed the children, what happens to their mothers who also have their peculiar challenges?
Apart from the tendency to always react to issues instead of avoiding them and dealing with symptoms instead of causes, governments in Nigeria have tended to confuse issues. The last time we checked, Nigeria still runs a capitalist economy and not socialist, where government at the centre decides how to feed children and concerns itself with primary education that belongs to the Local Governments.
On the other hand, the school feeding programme raises another problem; it is on record, that private schools take care of more children in Nigeria than the public schools. How then can it be explained to the children in private schools that the government discriminates against them.
Also worrisome is the sustainability of the programme especially given the funding arrangement which is already a challenge. Like the Universal Primary Education (UPE) scheme and the Universal Basic Education (UBE) scheme that failed to address any issue, why should government want to throw money into the drains again?
Over the centuries, different methods have been employed to encourage literacy; one may also be the school feeding system. But the adoption of scholarship had tended to take care of the bright and the indigent without making parents look inadequate and pitiable. Scholarships also promote competition and brings pride to the parents, who the feeding plan stand to defame.
On the whole, the safety of the children should be of paramount concern. It is common knowledge that parents in this part of the world advise their children against picking valuables on the ground as they walk by or accept gifts from strangers or put anything in the mouth that was not approved by their parents. There are very cogent reasons for these and the school feeding programme stand in contrast.
Finally, we think that there are roles carved out for parents and duties outlined for government, and none says that government should put food in the mouth of our children. The least government can do is to give free education, offer scholarships and awards and make the economy serve the needs of the family.
Editorial
Checkmating ‘One-Chance’ Menaces In PH
Editorial
That Oshiomhole’s Call On FG’s Road Projects
There are moments in the life of a legislature when plain speaking becomes a public service. Senator Adams Oshiomhole provided such a moment on the floor of the Senate when he accused the Minister of Works, Senator David Umahi, of manifestly neglecting critical federal arteries in Edo and Delta States, and implored his colleagues to prevail on the Minister to adopt a more equitable and genuinely national approach to road infrastructure delivery. It was blunt, it was uncomfortable, and it was necessary.
The specifics of his complaint deserve restating. Drawing attention to the recent approval of some 20 new road projects despite the parlous state of existing ones, the former Edo State governor lamented that Nigerians cannot travel from Benin to Warri, Benin to Asaba, Benin to Auchi, or Auchi to Okene without encountering severe distress. He alleged a deliberate omission of these corridors from the national budget in the last three years, save for palliative interventions directed by President Bola Tinubu through tax credit arrangements. His question — “What have we done wrong?” — resonates far beyond the chambers of the National Assembly.
We lend our full and unequivocal support to that call. The Auchi-Benin Road, for instance, has been in a deplorable and near-impassable condition for several years, turning what should be a two-hour journey into an all-day ordeal of broken axles, extortionate fares, and despondent commuters. The media have, on multiple occasions, chronicled the suffering of motorists, traders, and students who ply that route. To describe it as a federal road today is to stretch the meaning of the term beyond recognition.
This pattern of sidelining is not confined to Edo or Delta. Even here in Rivers State, the disposition of the Federal Ministry of Works has left much to be desired, particularly along the Eleme axis of the East-West Road. That road, which ought to be a flagship of federal presence in the Niger Delta, has remained in a wretched state for long. Those who use it daily — workers at the Eleme Petrochemical Complex, the two refineries, Onne Port, and the countless ancillary industries — can attest to its deterioration. Work has proceeded in fits and starts without the sustained urgency such a strategic road demands.
The Eleme stretch is not a mere intra-state byway. It is the gateway to the nation’s economic jugular. According to the Federal Ministry of Works and Housing’s 2023 Highway Condition Survey, only about 35 per cent of the country’s 36,000 kilometres of federal roads are rated as being in good or fair condition, with the remainder classified as poor or very poor. The East-West Road, conceived in the 1970s to bind the entire Niger Delta, remains unfinished in critical sections more than four decades after. If it had been treated as a priority, the perennial gridlock, carnage, and economic loss on the Eleme-Refinery junction would have long been consigned to history.
The irony is as painful as it is glaring. The Niger Delta remains the goose that lays the golden eggs. Data from the Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative [NEITI 2023 Oil and Gas Audit] show that the region still accounts for over 78 per cent of Nigeria’s federally collected export earnings and about 65 per cent of total government revenue. The National Bureau of Statistics [NBS Foreign Trade Report Q4 2024] similarly confirms that crude oil continues to dominate export receipts. By every metric of equity and economic logic, a region that sustains the national purse deserves first-rate consideration in the allocation of infrastructure, not afterthoughts and tokenism.
Road infrastructure is not largesse to be dispensed by favour; it is the skeleton upon which commerce, cohesion, and citizenship hang. When contracts are concentrated in one geopolitical zone while other zones are left to contend with craters, it erodes trust in the federation itself. The World Bank’s Nigeria Development Update [June 2023] estimated that poor transport connectivity inflates the cost of moving goods by up to 40 per cent and costs the Nigerian economy an estimated $1.5 billion annually in lost man-hours and vehicle maintenance. If we profess to be one country, then equity must be the compass that guides key institutions before any project is executed. Development must spread round, not pool in one place as though other regions do not matter.
There is also a grave security dimension that can no longer be ignored. The deplorable condition of federal roads has become a veritable enabler of criminality. The NBS Crime Experience and Security Perception Survey reported over 2.5 million incidents of kidnapping-related occurrences nationally, with transport workers identifying bad road spots as prime ambush points. When vehicles are forced to crawl at 10 kilometres per hour through failed sections at Auchi, Sapele Road, or Eleme, they become sitting ducks for armed gangs. Fixing bad roads, therefore, is not merely about convenience; it is about safeguarding lives.
By his intervention, Senator Oshiomhole has hit the nail on the head and reminded Minister Umahi of a fundamental constitutional truth: public office is held in trust. The Ministry of Works is not a personal estate where contracts are awarded according to whim or political convenience. It is a national institution funded by the collective resources of Nigerians, including the oil and gas rents from the very communities whose roads are now neglected. The Minister must demonstrate balance, transparency, and a pan-Nigerian outlook in the distribution of projects that impact the daily existence of citizens. Selective neglect breeds suspicion, and suspicion is corrosive at a time when the nation is preaching unity, oneness, equity, and justice.
Consequently, the National Assembly must go beyond rhetoric and assert its oversight powers with vigour. Sections 88 and 89 of the 1999 Constitution [as amended] empower the legislature to investigate and expose any maladministration in the execution of federal projects. If an office holder is not acting rightly, it is the duty of the Senate and the House of Representatives to call him to order. Oversight must not be reduced to budget approval ceremonies; it must translate to field verification, public hearings, and insistence that the Federal Character principle, as enshrined in Section 14(3) of the Constitution, reflects in road awards.
Let the Auchi-Okene, Benin-Warri, Benin-Asaba, and Eleme East-West gangways be restored to motorable dignity. Let priority be given to completing existing, economically vital roads before embarking on new ones. If those who, through their resources, sustain the federation are sidelined in the distribution of tangible dividends, it tells poorly of our nationhood. Bad roads must be fixed, and they must be fixed now, with fairness as the guiding standard.
Editorial
Making Rivers’ 2026 Budget Count
-
News2 days agoRSG Targets Nine Million Residents in Mosquito Net Distribution Campaign
-
Oil & Energy2 days agoAiyedatiwa Signs New Electricity Bill
-
Oil & Energy2 days agoNLNG Commissions Research And Innovation Centre In RSU
-
Maritime2 days agoMarine Minister Commends President Tinubu On NPERA Bill Assent
-
News2 days agoKenPoly Holds Eight Convocations, August 29
-
News2 days agoRSG Begins Another Phase of Projects Commissioning Today
-
News2 days agoRMAFC Completes Revenue Sharing Review, Proposes New Pay
-
Maritime2 days agoNAGAFF Petitions IGP Over Alleged Maritime Police Harassment
