Opinion
Should Rivers NLC Refuse To Unite…
The late renowned liter
ary writer, Chinua Achebe had since made it clear that when things fall apart, the centre can no longer hold.
The same way, the Holy Bible tells us that a house divided against itself cannot stand. This is typical of the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), Rivers State Chapter.
The State NLC over the past one year has been embroiled in an avoidable rift which has rendered it ineffective to speak in one voice on issues affecting the workforce. The division in the union arose from disagreement in the election of its state officers. This kind of disagreement is, however, not strange nor peculiar to the state, it cuts across the nation, but the others have been able to resolve their differences, while that of Rivers State still lingers. Why?
As a labour organisation, do the two factions of the NLC in the state know the implications of their factionalisation on workers’ welfare? Anyway, the leadership of the union has over the years failed to live up to workers’ expectations as they are known for serving their own personal interest to the detriments of workers’ welfare.
The NLC is one of the umbrella bodies of trade unions in Nigeria and supposedly a non-partisan organisation, expected to midwife between workers and their employers.
In this regard it is only reasonable for the Rivers State chapter of the NLC to realize and understand that it is the welfare of workers they are playing with it, with the factionalisation in the union.
Going by what is happening in the union now, I am tempted to conclude that the factional leaderships do not have the welfare of members at heart and perhaps have nothing to offer to better the working conditions of the state workforce. As it stands now, it is no longer a hidden fact that the Beatrice Itubo and the Ada Williams factional leaderships are seeking for self-benefits, rather than the traditional urge to struggle for workers’ welfare.
Although, the founding fathers of trade unionism in Nigeria has emphasized that working class action must be both social and political, especially after the industrial revolution in the coal city of Enugu, such actions however, must not be to the detriment of workers.
If I may ask, now that the state NLC’s umbrella of “united we stand’ has been torn, what becomes the faith of workers they claim to be representing and fighting for?
I think the best solution to this quagmire the union finds itself is to dissolve the two factional leaderships and set up a caretaker committee, devoid of political party inclination, that can reconcile the issues at stake and organise a fresh, free and fair election for a new leadership of the chapter to emerge.
Before now, the lock down had always been between government and the trade unions, but today, the unions are their own enemies. A situation whereby Workers’ or May Day is celebrated on two different grounds or places by two leadership factions is not and cannot be in the best interest of workers. The prime function of trade unions the world over is to protect and improve on the wages and working conditions of their members through collective actions, or bargaining with the employers. A union whose leadership derails from these objectives is not worthy of its existence.
Historically, one of the main reasons for the setting up of trade unions was for the workers to acquire a combined bargaining strength which would enable them to deal with the employers, but in the present circumstance which the Rivers State chapter of NLC has dumped itself, what can it do? Its existence, therefore, does not serve any useful purpose to the Rivers workforce whose salaries are being deducted on monthly basis as union dues.
In most cases, government is always happy when there is disagreement or crisis among union leaders, but the case of Rivers State is different. The state government had recently, through the Head of Service (HOS), advised the leaders of the two factions to sheathe their swords and resolve their differences to enable the government remit the workers’ check-off dues to the union.
But till now, the two factions still remain adamant. The question is, whose interest are these two factions serving if they cannot reconcile election matters that have lingered for over a year? How then would these leaders reconcile differences among their members?
Although the state government is a third party in the NLC rift in the state, I think it will not be out of place for government to reconcile the two factions. I say this because unusual problems sometimes require unusual solution. But if, after the government’s intervention, the two factions are adamant, it means they are heading towards self-destruction. And the Rivers State workforce I believe, will not hesitate to force them eat the humble pie.
Shedie Okpara
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers2 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News2 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics2 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured2 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News2 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro2 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News2 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News2 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
