Politics
N’Delta: Surviving The Burden Of Political Opposition

Rivers State Governor, Barr Nyesom Wike and Bayelsa State Governor, Hon. Seriake Dickson
The 2015 general elec
tions in Nigeria made history in many respects. One of the novelties that resulted from that exercise was the fact that a ruling political party became the opposition party for the first time in Nigeria.
Another dramatic outcome of that electoral exercise was that the strong hold of the opposition in Nigeria did not fall to any of the three majority tribes but to the South-South/Niger Delta region which had hitherto always found relevance and prominence on the national stage by affiliating with the ruling party or government at the centre.
Perhaps for fear of domination and/or subjugation by one or a combination of others, the minorities of the South-South region had never felt strong enough to stand alone and had always found it convenient to form alliance with, at least, one of dominant groups, especially the North, for political cover and protection since the inception of democratic governance in Nigeria.
This development has been viewed differently by various political observers. While some remain skeptical about the ultimate outcome of this turn of events in the political landscape of the Nigerian federation, there are others who see the development as a test of the political maturity of the region and its people. Yet there are those who consider it as an opportunity for a more rapid development and progress of the region endowed with natural resources but inhibited by an unfavourable political system in Nigeria.
“I think it’s a new dawn for the Niger Delta and it’s a good thing that has happened”, says Biebele Arimie, a Procurement and Supply Management expert and public affairs analyst.
According to Arimie, the development comes with an opportunity for a healthy competition that will benefit the people if the leaders understand it and will be wise enough not to tear themselves and the people apart along party lines.
He enjoined the political elite in the region to use the opportunity to engage in what he called “Developmental competition; rather than use it to precipitate crisis and violence that will help to further impoverish and underdevelop the people.
“Those who are opportune to be functionaries in the federal government should begin to think of strategies of how to work out ways to compete with their various state government, not by precipitating violence but by attracting projects from the federal government to their various states in the Niger Delta”, he said.
Arimie observed that the long years of romance with the central government had not much benefited the region after all, insisting that belonging to the mainstream had made it difficult for the leadership of the region to be assertive and vehement in agitating for what is their due but had rather just tagged along for fear of losing their place.
“It is also not so beneficial to have the region and the centre in the same party like when Goodluck Jonathan was in power. There was no competition. Everybody was afraid. But right now, if you ask me, we are supposed to have a healthy competitions,” he emphasized, adding that this is possible by functionaries at both levels of government who belong to opposing political parties closely watching each other and taking appropriate development, actions to win the endorsement and support of the people.
Arimie, who was also the Rivers and Bayelsa States Chapter Chairman of the Nigerian Institute of Supply and Procurement Management, urged political leaders in the region to avoid the temptation of using the occasion to engage in unnecessary bickering and unhealthy rivalry that will not yield any beneficial results in the end.
“There will be criticism of how well each one is doing. But we don’t want a situation like what happened in Ogu where Nyesom Wike as Minister of Education came to the Technical School and laid the foundation to say we want to build this school. By then, Chibuike Amaechi as governor of Rivers State also went to the same place and said ‘look I also want to build the same school. At the end of the day, nobody built anything. We don’t want that kind of competition”, he reiterated, adding that, “if both the majority party and opposition will listen to the voice of wisdom and ensure that nobody continues to precipitate violence under any guise, Rivers State and the Niger Delta will grow faster and faster.”
Comrade Christian Lekia, a rights activist and a crusader for non-violence in the Niger Delta shares the sentiments and hopes of Biebele Arimie cautiously. According to Comrade Lekia, the task of the minorities surmounting the challenges of opposition politics in Nigeria is not insurmountable but clearly very difficult. He expressed the fear that with the soul of the opposition outside the three dominant tribes in Nigeria, it would be difficult for the minority tribes to assert themselves on the nation in that role.
He said even though this was not the first time the country would be experiencing politics, it was difficult to see if the minorities of the South-South region have the ingredients to survive and surmount the challenges as Lagos State did under the Olusegun Obasanjo presidency. “Whatever Lagos State did to re-enact itself nationally through alliance and friendship with the North, the minority political opposition party in the South-South must redouble that effort,” he said. Comrade Lekia said Lagos State survived opposition because they remained strong in their focus, principles, belief in their party ideology in addition to believing in themselves and urged the present political leaders in the Niger Delta to borrow a leaf from that experience and make the desired impact for the region and the nation at large.
“When you find a political leadership which major interest is about receiving allocation from the centre and going cap in hand to the centre for every need at the state level, then you justify why we were doing better. Doing better in the sense that they had smooth relationship with the centre but in the actual sense of it I really do not see so much in terms of benefit from the centre because the political leadership was so comfortable with what they were getting”, he stressed.
With the turn of events, Comrade Lekia urged the current political leadership in the region to be “challenged with how to become more productive; how to device better and more effective means of managing our economy, especially when it comes to internally generated revenue and engaging the people.”
“This is an opportunity for the minority opposition in the South-South to show the might of their intellect, the might of their understanding in terms of the game of politics. It’s not about surviving from breast to mouth like a mother-baby relationship,” he said, adding that this is the first time they will have to stand up and devise means of surviving and making a statement that they understand why they are in power as minorities and as opposition in Nigeria.”
He said even through the region remains a component of the federation, the political and socio-economic survival and wellbeing of the states and the region lies squarely on the shoulders of their leadership as no one can dictate to them nor run their affairs directly for them. I couldn’t see it as a disadvantage. I see as a call on the political class within the South-South to re-echo their voices and show their might and that they understand what they’re in power to do. Let them play according to the rules of the game and think of ingenuous ways of generating income from independent sources,” he said, pointing out that if Lagos could stand alone and pull through with only a service based economy, the Niger Delta region with its rich natural endowments cannot but fare better with the right attitude and commitment by its leadership.
“So, if you find a responsible leadership managing the economies of these states and delivering the dividends of democracy to the people, you won’t really find any reason why you will be feeling the impact of the centre negatively,” the rights activist concluded.
Perhaps this is the right time to revive and strengthen such initiates as the BRACED Commission and the South-South Peoples Assembly to foster regional integration through social, cultural, economic and political cooperation aimed at achieving a united front and a structural development for the disadvantaged people of the region.
Politics
FG’s Economic Policies Not Working – APC Chieftain
A senator who represented Taraba Central, Mr Abubakar Yusuf, has declared that the economic policies of President Bola Tinubu are not yielding the expected results.
His comment is one of the strongest internal critiques yet from within the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC).
The comment underscores the growing dissatisfaction within sections of the ruling party over the direction and impact of the administration’s economic reforms amid rising living costs and fiscal pressures across the country.
Mr Yusuf, who served in the Senate between 2015 and 2023 under the platform of the APC, made the remarks during an appearance on national television.
Responding to a question on whether the administration’s economic direction, often referred to as Tinubunomics, was working, Mr Yusuf answered in the contrary.
“For me, it is not working. I am a member of the APC. I would be the last person to hide the facts”, he said.
He said while the government might be operating diligently within its policy structure, the framework itself is ill-suited to Nigeria’s current realities
“Within the policy framework, yes, they are doing their best, but it is not the framework that is suitable for Nigeria at the point in time that President Asiwaju came into power,” he said.
Mr Yusuf criticised the immediate removal of fuel subsidy on the day the president was sworn in, arguing that the decision lacked sufficient consultation and planning.
“I am one of those who say President Asiwaju ought to have waited. Not on the day he was sworn in to say subsidy is gone. On what basis?”, he asked.
He urged broader engagement before major fiscal decisions are taken.
“Sit down with your cabinet, sit down with your ministers, sit down with your advisers,” he said, dismissing the argument that subsidy removal was justified solely on grounds of corruption.
The former lawmaker identified “structural flaws” in the country’s budgeting system, particularly the envelope budgeting model.
“One of the basic problems is that before you budget, you should have a plan. The envelope system we have been operating has been you budget before you plan. That has been a major issue”, he said.
He argued that allocating spending ceilings without aligning them to concrete development strategies inevitably weakens implementation and delivery.
“If you give me an envelope which is contrary to my plan, whether it is plus or minus, there is no way I am going to implement my plan. It is bound to fail,” he said.
Mr Yusuf called for the scrapping of the envelope budgeting system, noting that he had consistently opposed it even during his years in the National Assembly.
“It is not good for us. It is not going to work well for us,” he said.
He further blamed poor capital releases and persistent deficit financing for undermining budget performance over the years.
“We could not meet 60 percent of our capital budget in all these years. No releases. If you make a budget and the release is very poor, there is no way the budget will be executed”, he stated.
According to him, weak fund disbursement mechanisms and reliance on deficit financing have entrenched a cycle of underperformance.
“Our budget ought to have been a surplus budget, but all our budgets have always been deficit financing budgets,” Mr Yusuf added.
Politics
Reps To Meet,’Morrow Over INEC’s 2027 Election Timetable
The Nigerian House of Representatives has resolved to reconvene for an emergency session tomorrow February 17, 2026, to deliberate on issues arising from the Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) release of the timetable for the 2027 general elections.
The decision was disclosed in a statement issued by the House Spokesman, Rep. Akin Rotimi, who described the electoral body’s announcement as one of “constitutional and national significance.”
INEC had fixed February 20, 2027, for the Presidential and National Assembly elections.
According to the statement, members of the Green Chamber were notified of the emergency sitting through an internal memorandum from the Speaker’s office.
The session is expected to focus on legislative matters connected to the newly released timetable, reflecting the House’s resolve to act promptly on issues affecting the nation’s democratic process.
Rep. Rotimi noted that all related businesses would be treated with urgency and urged lawmakers to prioritise attendance in view of the importance of the deliberations.
INEC had on Friday formally unveiled the comprehensive schedule for the 2027 polls, including timelines for party primaries slated for July to September 2026, as well as the commencement of Continuous Voter Registration in April 2026.
The development comes amid ongoing consultations and proposed amendments to the Electoral Act ahead of the 2027 general elections.
Politics
Group Continues Push For Real Time Election Results Transmission
As the controversy over the transmission of election results continues across the country, the Defence For Human Rights And Democracy (DHRD), a pro democracy organisation in the country, has criticised the National Assembly for not giving express approval to real time transmission of elections results.
To this end, the group is calling on all civil society organisations in the country to mobilise and push for a better Electoral Reform in the country.
This was contained in a press statement titled, “Defence For Human Rights and Democracy Demands Real Time Election Transmission of Result”, a copy of which was made available to newsmen in Port Harcourt.
The group described the refusal of compulsory real time transmission of result results by the Senate as undemocratic, adding that the situation will give room for election manipulation, rigging and voters apathy.
It said that the provision of mandatory real time transmission of election results would have significant improvement on the nation’s democracy.
According to the statement, “Since the return of democracy in 1999 to date, it is 27 years, so our Democracy has metamorphosed from being nascent and as such significant improvement should have been recorded.
“Defence For Human Rights And Democracy (DHRD), is really disappointed at the National Assembly, especially the upper chamber (Senate) for not approving ‘Real Time Electronic Transmission of Election Result’.
“This undemocratic act of theirs, if not tamed, will give room for election manipulation and rigging’”.
Signed by Comrade Clifford Christopher Solomon on behalf of the organisation, the statement further said, “The Defence For Human Rights and Democracy unequivocally supports real time transmission of election result”, stressing that his group will resist any act by the National Assembly to undermine the nation’s democracy.
“DHRD,unequivocally supports ‘True Democracy’, which is Government of the people, by the people and for the people.
“Therefore, anything that will crash the hope of Nigerians to Freely, Fairly and Transparently elect candidates of their choice in any given election should and will be vehemently resisted because good governance begins with leaders elected through credible process. By so doing, leaders have entered a social contract with the citizens to equitably manage their affairs and abundant resources”, the statement added.
It urged the National Assembly to revisit the issue in order to avoid civil unrest.
According to the DHRD, “To avoid civil unrest,voters apathy, election rigging and manipulation, rather to promote citizens participation, advancing our Democracy and entrenching free, fair, credible and acceptable electoral outcome, the National Assembly should amend the electoral act in a manner that will deepen our democracy and boost citizens confidence.
“On this note, The Defence For Human Rights And Democracy (DHRD), is calling on all other civil society organisations (CSOs) to mobilise, organise and push for a better electoral act amendment by the National Assembly”.
By: John Bibor
