Opinion
Where Are Party Ideologies?
Every constitutional democracy provides for the for
mation of political parties. Section 228, sub-section (b) and (e) of the 1999 constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as amended, stipulates certain pre-conditions for the formation of political parties. These among others include: That no association by whatever name called shall function as a political party unless the membership of the association is open to every citizen of Nigeria irrespective of his place of origin, circumstance of birth, gender, religion or ethnic grouping, that the name of the association, its symbol or logo does not contain any ethnic or religious connotation or give the appearance that the activities of the association are confined to a part only of the geographical area of Nigeria.
Political party according to section 235 of the constitution under reference includes any association whose activities include canvassing for votes in support of a candidate for election to the office of President, vice-president, governor, deputy governor, or membership of a legislative house or a local government council.
Beyond the foregoing constitutional requirements of a political party, it also presupposes an organised group of persons, who aggregate the views and interests of its members and articulate same in such a way as to have them reflected in government policies.
Again, political parties, more than canvassing for votes in support of candidates for elective offices, also provide the avenue for a peaceful and orderly succession of administrations, and as well provide political education and sensitization for its members and by extension, the electorates. This in turn enhances people’s political consciousness and participation in the electoral process.
Going by the important role political parties play in the polity, they could be said to be indispensable institutions to reckon with in any democratic setting. There is therefore, no gainsaying the fact that political parties could be invaluable instruments in fostering political stability in Nigeria’s emerging democracy. This, however, could be realised if only our political leaders and their followers play party politics on the basis of “national interest” as opposed to ethnic, religious, parochial or sectional interests.
It is quite disturbing to note that party politics in Nigeria today is still being played along ethnic and religious lines with the attendant incessant rivalries between and among political party opponents.
The activities of political parties in the present dispensation are similar to what we experienced during the first, second and third republics of 1966, 1983 and 1993, respectively. It would be recalled that during these periods, there where high level political instability in the country, owing to civil crisis occasioned by widespread corruption, nepotism and tribal politics. This consequently led to a prolonged military intervention in the country. The activities of political parties today cannot be said to be different from the past republics. Aggrieved political leaders and their followers now resort to verbal and physical attacks against their opponents.
This ought not to be so especially when Nigeria is just trying to find its feet as a democratic nation. In some countries like the United States, Australia, South Africa and even Ghana, political ideologies and national interest,other than ethnic, religious and greed for power hold sway. The opposition and ruling political parties compete for elective offices not on the basis of personal vendetta and acrimony but on grounds of effective performance and implementation of public policies, programmes and projects which impact positively on the lives of the people.
To do this, opposition political parties should begin to intensify effort at educating and sensitising its members as well as the electorates on its ideologies and manifestos vis-à-vis the policies and programmes of the ruling party. This would enable the electorate to make informed and right choices of candidates during elections. The effective and positive use of the mass media in propagating these activities in this regard is very imperative.
This way, the spate of unhealthy rivalries and hostilities between the opposition and the ruling political party would be minimized, if not utterly eliminated in Nigeria’s party politics.
Fombo wrote from Port Harcourt.
Iyeowuna Alfred Fombo
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion3 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
News3 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
-
News7 hours ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News7 hours agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
Featured3 days agoTinubu Jets To S’Arabia For Lesser Hajj …Unveils Free Healthcare For Pensioners
-
Niger Delta6 hours ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Rivers4 hours ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Niger Delta3 days ago
Police Rescue Woman, 24, From Online Dating Kidnappers … Arrest Five Suspects
