Opinion
Between Hawking And Youth Empowerment (II)
Equally, the activity of hawking keeps
undermining the effort of the government to keep the environment clean. It is evident that our roads or highways are daily littered with wraps, cans, bottles, packets of different edibles purchased from hawkers, and eaten along the way. Also, virtually every place or gutter is filled up with sachets of pure water and these non- biodegradables. On the whole, the sight of hawkers on our high ways gives the impression of a disordered society where anything can go.
Culturally, hawking is not gender sensitive as both men and women freely indulge in it. It may not be out of place to say that it is a national culture in that it has broken down both tribal and ethnic barriers. Given that every tribe or ethnic group transacts this business in Nigeria, one can tag hawking a common culture in Nigeria. Observably, it is gradually becoming a culture of its own or a way of life which people easily embrace or are socialized into. For instance, some school children would go hawking just because their friends do so, and in that order they think it a way of growing up. For such children, their parents are not so poor as to send them hawking rather, they steal away from home with one excuse or the other, and go and join their friends to hawk. Hence, some people hawk for the fun of it, as they are usually seen in groups gisting along the way more, it gets people of diverse cultures to interact as they transact their business both among the hawkers and their customers. This way, it makes for national unity as it bridges both social class and ethnic gaps?
Developmentally, the hawking business more or less does not make for any palpable development, Perhaps, it is not guaranteed if people can save enough money from hawking to set up any worthwhile venture or business. Intellectually, the paucity of fund that led to hawking does not allow one get properly educated or develop his intellectual ability fully. This is so in that those of them that are in school do not have time to read their books after school nor do their assignment at home. After hawking, they come home tired and worn out structurally, hawkers prefer bad roads where vehicles move at slow pace in order to transact their business. It is not uncommon to see them converge at bad spots on the road which often cause traffic jam to carry on their business. Hence, their presence could be anti-structural development for the construction of good roads will be bad business for them. On the other hand, their presence and their number are suggestive of the level of unemployment in the country. It is then a call for the government to develop or expand more her economic sector to employ them and get them off the roads.
Verily, some hawkers have met their untimely deaths on the highways because they were knocked down by vehicles. Some are suffering permanent or temporary disability from accidents as a result of hawking, still, some have been kidnapped for ritual purposes and such related crimes because they are out hawking. Equally, hawkers are something of a security risk in that some hoodlums disguise as hawkers to await their targeted preys and some hawkers give privy information to criminals. Nonetheless, some hawkers distract the security agents on their duty posts from effectively discharging their duties by keeping them company and chatting away with them especially the female hawkers.
Vividly then, hawking on the highways in Nigeria has both the good, the bad, the ugly. The good, which is economic gain or benefit is only apparent or latent, while the bad and the ugly are more manifest. This is so in that, in hawking, a sizeable quality of youthful energy is wasted and lost without release in the drive to develop the economy of Nigeria. Pointedly, many talents, skills as well as potentials of the hawkers are untapped and undeveloped by the country,. Above all, given the large number of youthful hawkers in Nigeria and the seeming silence of the government as regards their activities, I wish to ask the government: “Is Hawking a youth empowerment or poverty alleviation strategy in Nigeria?”
Concluded.
Okafor is of CIWA
Arinze Okafor
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers5 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education5 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta5 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education5 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News5 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
Rivers22 hours ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News21 hours agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
News5 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
