It has become something of grave concern that every
misfortune that befalls the nation today is regarded totally as the President’s faults. For instance, every activity of these faceless goofs called Boko Haram is attributed to presidential inefficiency and lapses. The fact that he has sworn to protect lives and properties of the citizenry does not suggest that he is God. He is no less than a mere mortal body as you and I. He is neither a spirit nor omnipresent, omnipotent or omniscient that can operate in the capacity of the Almighty. So the blames, tongue-lashes, accusations and call for his resignation is mischievious and borne out of envy and eccentric ethos of flimflam.
The issue of security, all over the world does not rest on the    President alone. It is always a collective responsibility. The Boko Haram insurgency for years now cannot be used as a yardstick to measure the insensibility of the President over the nation’s insecurity. Even the military and other relevant security agencies who are basically trained in the fields of physical combat and warfare are more or less rendered incapacitated in this circumstance. How would you confront a war that you know not where it would operate within the next minute? Or how would one engage air in battle? The then Niger Delta militants operate from a well known point with genuine agitation and less human target.
It is unfortunate when people say the President or Federal Government must be proactive, must do this or that to fight kidnapping, secure the release of the abducted Chibok school girls, curb the Boko Haram bombings and completely erase insecurity from the country. This is absolutely impossible. What kind of magic do we expect from the President.
Again, how can the President or Federal Government succeed in the fight when there is sabotage all around the system? And how can a full scale military option be employed in the midst of obscure operations of the insurgence?
In another instance, the ideological concept of our nascent democracy that gives rise to so much freedom including certain attributes of rights and other components which also gives leverage to agencies like Human Right Commission, Civil Liberty Organisation (CLO) etc to react on certain action and policies of governance, also poses constructional force on government efforts.
As a matter of fact, the President can decide to use maximum force, as the Commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces without minding whose ox is gored or the effect of such action on civilians, environment, properties etc. What shall be the outcry of the people, Human Right Commission or Civil Liberty Organisation? It would be recalled that commendable steps like this were utilised sometimes ago by the former Chief of Army Staff, General Azubuike Iheijirika, CFR (Rtd) and certain level of positive results were achieved. But at the end of his tenure, what happened? He was accused by northern leaders of human right abuse and threatened with International Court of Justice (ICJ). So in a situation where every action or step is viewed with skeptical dogma by human rights groups who are always roaring like hungry lion looking for who to devour, the President could be distracted.
In as much as we are referring to the style of the South Korean Prime Minister, Chung Hong-Won who resigned honourably from power amidst public outrage  over his bungling of the sewol-ferry disaster which  claimed the life of over 300 people on April 16, 2014, we argue that such measure cannot be equated with Nigeria.     And all things equal, in terms of development, Nigeria cannot be compared with Republic of South Korea for now.
In governance, leadership style, ideology, developmental strategy, scientific innovation, economic, political, social and otherwise, Nigeria is far below South Korea for now. So the earlier we stop measuring ourselves with developed and political stabilised countries of the world, the better it would be for us to proffer solution to our problems within the confines of our constitution.
On September 11, 2001, the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon in the United States of American (USA) were bombed by the notorious late Osama Bin Ladin’s Al Qaeda terrorists and thousands of people lost their lives, some others wounded and properties worth billions of dollars destroyed. Till the end of this world, the memory of that event will remain indelible in the minds of Americans. But the big lessons we learnt from the American experience and handling of the whole situation were that no American citizen traded blame with President George Bush or his Republican Party. Nobody demanded his resignation, not even the opposition party, the Democrat. Every citizen demonstrated his or her patriotism by offering solutions that could help bring the culprits to justice. And 10 years later, the world most wanted criminal who masterminded the heinous crime, Osama Bin Ladin was killed and his AI Qaeda group destabilised.
Another important lesson is the number of years it took America to achieve result and the fact that crime of that magnitude was planned and executed inspite of the super power status of America in terms of latest science and technology. So what can be said about a country like Nigeria, a third or fourth world, a primary producer, consuming nation full of gaggle?
Today the issue of insecurity is politicised by even those that are vested with the responsibility of joining forces with the President to fight it. In the name of gaining back power, anything can happen. Northern elites and traditional rulers cannot wash off their hands completely from this menace.
What one sows, he reaps. All the northern elites and traditional rulers have questions to answer. How would the president be blamed and where is he going to start from when every agency, parastatal, ministry and the military has been infiltrated by Boko Haram like corruption? It is only the blind, dumb and deaf that would not analyse properly and see the true picture of all that is happening.
Tordee, a social commentator and public affairs analyst, resides in Port Harcourt.

Manson Tordee