Opinion
Need To Monitor Public Officers
The level of laxity and recklessness of most public officers has really gone out of hands. This poor disposition of public functionaries has taken great toll on the proper functioning and administrative process of government agencies and parastatals. Looking at what is happening everyday in the public sector among our needed government officials, especially when it comes to rendering the required services that tax payer’s money is being expended upon, one wonders if there is no way of properly controlling the excesses of some government functionaries.
Recently, at the formal inauguration of National Assemblies Service Commission in Abuja, the President, Dr Goodluck Jonathan categorically and unequivocally declared that, “one of the problems we have as a nation is indiscipline, from the least worker to the highest”. He identified this problem as almost having the same hampering effect as corruption on the economies of the nation and enjoined members of the commission to work seriously to instil discipline in public service across the nation.
Though many viewed the President’s position with skepticism and reacted differently, but I want to put it to them that the President is absolutely right in his assertion.
It is disgusting that most public officers no longer take their job seriously. Lack of trust, commitment and diligence has continued to impoverish our system. A public servant has the responsibility of disseminating government information to prospective users. He or she also attends to the private and public needs of members of the public in terms of information.
A public officer should always be prepared to attend to the public in his area of responsibility. And by the acts and ethics of a professional public servant, the virtue of politeness, secrecy, commitment, dedication, loyalty and equality are their watchwords. Therefore, every public or civil servant is expected to carry out his or her services in a manner equivalent to hospitality and charity. This is why in consideration of the prevailing level of indiscipline and corruption among civil servants (public servants), it has become imperative for government to establish or create a secret email to gather information on their nefarious activities in order to checkmate growing criminal tendencies and bring some sanity into the system.
This secret email or a website should be created by all government functionaries or top officers, governors, and even the president to track down negligence on the part of workers. When created for instance, by a governor, it will be accessible by him alone but can be familiar to everybody for emailing such a top-officer when something goes wrong. This is mostly useful as the possibility of otherwise reaching out to the top officers, for instance , the governor, is always remote or slim.
It is a common phenomenon that gossip goes on everyday at workplaces or offices and we believe that in every nonsense, there is a sense. So, in every gossip, some truth could be extracted. So, at the creation of this email or website, people should have the opportunity of reaching out to the Big-Boss in charge, who goes through them and extracts every useful information therein. This will surely help in the day-to-day execution of administrative activities and policies and keep down the level of indiscipline and corrupt practices among public officials. Moreover, it will help in curbing the excesses of public officers and help in creating room for good governance and ensure total commitment to duty by public officers.
Besides, it will also help to prevent wastage and leakages in the system, enhance proper accountability and stock-taking on the part of government while creating room for proper evaluation and monitoring.
No doubt, the numerous advantages of such an arrangement has some short-comings as some members of the public would abuse such opportunity which might lead to witch hunt of perceived enemies in the system.
However, be that as it may, analysis has actually revealed and proved that if properly harnessed and utilised, the proposed email will ensure discipline in both the private and public sectors of our services. Let’s try it.
Tordee resides in Port Harcourt.
Manson B. Tordee
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion5 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
Education2 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Rivers2 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Niger Delta2 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education2 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News2 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News2 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News5 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
