Opinion
A Pyrrhic Victory?
The electoral body in Zimbabwe shocked Zimbabweans who have been yawning for a change of leadership and indeed the international community when it announced the result of a recently-conducted election and declared the ageless President Robert Mugabe winner for the 7th time.
The 89-year old president of the Southern African country and the leader of the ruling Zimbabwe African National Union – Patriotic Front (ZANU-PF) contested the election on the platform of his party.
According to the result released by the electoral body, ZANU-PF got 61.09 per cent of the total votes cast on the July 31 election to beat his perennial rival and Prime Minister, Morgan Tsvangarai, of the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC). The prime minister, widely believed to be an ally of Western powers, scored 34 percent of the votes.
Besides the presidential election which Mugabe won, his party secured 160 parliamentary seats against the 49 won by the rival MDC. This victory apparently positions the ZANU-PF party to tinker with the constitution and possibly legalize Mugabe’s ambition to be life president.
Expectedly, the opposition MDC has rejected the result and described it as a complete sham. Apart from the era of the late opposition leader, Mr. Joshua Nkomo, this electoral defeat has been described as the heaviest in the elections held in that country in recent times.
Some observers have partially blamed the massive defeat suffered by MDC on its ill preparedness. They reasoned that the candidate of the opposition party might after all be a wrong choice as he had featured severally and hence lost political value.
But a more worrisome problem was the pre-election protest by the MDC against the process leading to the election which appeared skewed in favour of President Mugabe’s party. Issues were raised about the authenticity of the voters’ register. While the electoral body claimed that only 300,000 voters were denied voting on election day, the opposition put the actual figure of those disenfranchised at approximately 900,000. The country’s electoral authorities also said about another 200,000 voters had to be “assisted”, an act which has been interpreted to be a veiled reference to voter manipulation.
Considering the facts made available by the electoral body, it is possible that the 89-year old president might not have won as convincingly as his party claims. However, if the MDC heads to court as it threatens it will do, I am very optimistic that the party will not get the justice it seeks. Mugabe and his cohorts would emerge victorious from the court.
Regardless of what the court verdict might be, I believe the verdict given by the court of public opinion is what Mugabe and his ZANU-PF party have to contend with and the moral burden that comes with it. But even if the octogenarian won the election in less controversial circumstances, is it not a shame that in this modern era a man will rule a country for 33 years, when the nation is not under a monarchy?
When this tenure expires, Mugabe will be 95. By then he would have ruled Zimbabwe for 39 years. Unless he dies in the course of that tenure, there is still no guarantee that he would not go for an eighth term.
Undoubtedly, the seeming life president was the architect of the struggle for his nation’s independence against white minority rule. It is also unarguable that he redressed the vexatious land issue (which saw minority whites owning most of the arable land in the country) in favour of blacks who are in the majority. But is it not curious that in a country of about 14 million people, only one man has monopoly of answers to the many problems of the country?
It is wrong for Mugabe, who has ruled Zimbabwe since independence in 1980, to consider himself indispensable one who must rule interminably. The fact that he has failed to groom a successor all these years questions his leadership credentials and suggests that he is selfish and perhaps has a lot to conceal. Election observers may have passed the election as free and fair, but there seems to be something wrong with the entire process and outcome. Mugabe’s victory may be a pyrrhic one after all.
Sadly, there are many African leaders who operate in the shoes of Mugabe. From Cameroun, Uganda, Burkina Faso to Equitorial Guinea and several other countries, the story is that their leaders have no intention to vacate after many years of leadership. Despite the revolution sweeping away many sit-tight leaders in Africa, Mugabe and his co-travellers have failed to see the inevitable end that awaits all leaders who strangulate democracy by their hold on power.
Therefore the most honourable thing for him to do is to step down and let the younger ones rule. He has to act fast before he is swept off by the revolution devouring sit-tight rulers in Africa.
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
Quote:”While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries”.
The Governor of Rivers State, Sir Siminalayi Fubara, recently urged youths in the Rivers State to take advantage of the vast opportunities available to become employers of labour and contribute meaningfully to the growth and development of the State. Governor Fubara noted that global trends increasingly favour entrepreneurship and innovation, and said that youths in Rivers State must not be left behind in harnessing these opportunities. The Governor, represented by the Secretary to the State Government, Dr Benibo Anabraba, made this known while declaring open the 2026 Job Fair organised by the Rivers State Government in partnership with the Nigeria Employers’ Consultative Association (NECA) in Port Harcourt. The Governor acknowledged the responsibility of government to create jobs for its teeming youth population but noted that it is unrealistic to absorb all job seekers into the civil service.
“As a government, we recognise our duty to provide employment opportunities for our teeming youths. However, we also understand that not all youths can be accommodated within the civil service. This underscores the need to encourage entrepreneurship across diverse sectors and to partner with other stakeholders, including the youths themselves, so they can transition from being job seekers to employers of labour,” he said. It is necessary to State that Governor Fubara has not only stated the obvious but was committed to drive youth entrepreneurship towards their self-reliance and the economic development of the State It is not news that developed economies of the world are skilled driven economies. The private sector also remains the highest employer of labour in private sector driven or capitalist economy though it is also the responsibility of government to create job opportunities for the teeming unemployed youth population in Nigeria which has the highest youth unemployed population in the subSahara Africa.
The lack of job opportunities, caused partly by the Federal Government’s apathy to job creation, the lack of adequate supervision of job opportunities economic programmes, lack of employable skills by many youths in the country have conspired to heighten the attendant challenges of unemployment. The challenges which include, “Japa” syndrome (travelling abroad for greener pastures), that characterises the labour market and poses threat to the nation’s critical sector, especially the health and medical sector; astronomical increase in the crime rate and a loss of interest in education. While job seeking youths should continuously acquire skills and explore opportunities within their immediate environment as well as in the global space through the use of digital platforms, government, corporate/ multinational organizations or the organised private sector should generate skills and provide the enabling environment for skills acquisition, through adequate funding and resettlement packages that will provide sustainable economic life for beneficiaries.
While commending the Rivers State Government led by the People First Governor, Sir Siminilayi Fubara for initiating “various training and capacity-building programmes in areas such as ICT and artificial intelligence, oil and gas, maritime, and the blue economy, among others”, it is note-worthy that the labour market is dynamic and shaped by industry-specific demands, technological advancements, management practices and other emerging factors. So another sector the Federal, State and Local Governments should encourage youths to explore and harness the abounding potentials, in my considered view, is Agriculture. Agriculture remains a veritable solution to hunger, inflation, and food Insecurity that ravages the country. No doubt, the Nigeria’s arable landmass is grossly under-utilised and under-exploited.
In recent times, Nigerians have voiced their concerns about the persistent challenges of hunger, inflation, and the general increase in prices of goods and commodities. These issues not only affect the livelihoods of individuals and families but also pose significant threats to food security and economic stability in the country. The United Nations estimated that more than 25 million people in Nigeria could face food insecurity this year—a 47% increase from the 17 million people already at risk of going hungry, mainly due to ongoing insecurity, protracted conflicts, and rising food prices. An estimated two million children under five are likely to be pushed into acute malnutrition. (Reliefweb ,2023). In response, Nigeria declared a state of emergency on food insecurity, recognizing the urgent need to tackle food shortages, stabilize rising prices, and protect farmers facing violence from armed groups. However, without addressing the insecurity challenges, farmers will continue to struggle to feed their families and boost food production.
In addition, parts of northwest and northeast Nigeria have experienced changes in rainfall patterns making less water available for crop production. These climate change events have resulted in droughts and land degradations; presenting challenges for local communities and leading to significant impact on food security. In light of these daunting challenges, it is imperative to address the intricate interplay between insecurity and agricultural productivity. Nigeria can work toward ensuring food security, reducing poverty, and fostering sustainable economic growth in its vital agricultural sector. In this article, I suggest solutions that could enhance agricultural production and ensure that every state scales its agricultural production to a level where it can cater to 60% of the population.
This is feasible and achievable if government at all levels are intentional driving the development of the agricultural sector which was the major economic mainstay of the Country before the crude oil was struck in commercial quantity and consequently became the nation’s monolithic revenue source. Government should revive the moribund Graduate Farmers Scheme and the Rivers State School-to-Land agricultural programmes to operate concurrently with other skills acquisition and development programmes. There should be a consideration for investment in mechanized farming and arable land allocation. State and local governments should play a pivotal role in promoting mechanized farming and providing arable land for farming in communities. Additionally, allocating arable land enables small holder farmers to expand their operations and contribute to food security at the grassroots level.
Nigeria can unlock the potential of its agricultural sector to address the pressing needs of its population and achieve sustainable development. Policymakers and stakeholders must heed Akande’s recommendations and take decisive action to ensure a food-secure future for all Nigerians.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Opinion
Of Protests And Need For Dialogue
Quote:“.Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement”
It was a turbulent week in the country, highlighting the widening gap between government intentions and public perception. From Abuja to Anambra and Lagos, citizens poured into the streets not just over specific grievances but in frustration with governance that often appears heavy-handed, confrontational, or insufficiently humane. While authorities may genuinely act in the public interest, their methods sometimes aggravate tensions rather than resolve them.
In Abuja, the strike by workers of the Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) and the Federal Capital Development Authority (FCDA) under the Joint Union Action Committee (JUAC) brought the capital to a near standstill. Their demands included five months’ unpaid wages, hazard and rural allowances, promotion arrears, welfare packages, pension and National Housing Fund remittances, and training and career progression concerns. These are core labour issues that directly affect workers’ dignity and livelihoods. Efforts to dialogue with the FCT Minister reportedly failed. Even after a court ordered the strike to end, workers persisted, underscoring the depth of discontent. Threats and sanctions only hardened positions.
The FCT crisis shows that industrial peace cannot be enforced through coercion. Dialogue is not weakness; it is recognition that governance is about people. Meeting labour leaders, listening attentively, clarifying grey areas, and agreeing on timelines could restore trust. Honesty and negotiation are far more effective than threats.
In Anambra, protests by Onitsha Main Market traders followed the government’s closure of the market over continued observance of a Monday sit-at-home, linked to separatist agitation. Governor Chukwuma Soludo described compliance as economic sabotage, insisting Anambra cannot operate as a “four-day-a-week economy.” While the governor’s concern is understandable, threats to revoke ownership, seize, or demolish the market risk escalating tensions. Many traders comply out of fear, not ideology. Markets are social ecosystems of families, apprentices, and informal networks; heavy-handed enforcement may worsen resistance. A better approach combines persuasion, dialogue with market leaders, credible security assurances, and gradual confidence-building. Coordinated political engagement with federal authorities could also reduce regional tensions.
In Lagos, protests erupted over demolition of homes in low-income waterfront communities such as Makoko, Owode Onirin, and Oworonshoki. The state defended these actions as necessary for safety, environmental protection, and urban renewal. While objectives are legitimate, demolitions drew criticism for lack of notice, compensation, and humane resettlement. Urban development without regard for human consequences risks appearing elitist and anti-poor. Where demolitions are unavoidable, transparent engagement, fair compensation, and realistic relocation must precede action to maintain public trust and social stability.
Across Abuja, Anambra, and Lagos, a common thread emerges: a disconnect between authority and empathy. Government actions may follow policy logic, but citizens respond from lived experience, fear, and frustration. When these realities collide without dialogue, the streets become the arena of engagement.
Democracy cannot thrive on decrees, threats, or bulldozers alone. Leaders must listen as much as they command, persuade as much as they enforce. Minister Wike should see labour leaders as partners, Governor Soludo must balance firmness with sensitivity, and Lagos authorities should align urban renewal with compassion and justice. Protests are signals of communication failure. Dialogue, caution, and a human face in governance are not optional—they are necessities. Police and security agencies must respect peaceful protest as a constitutional right.
By: Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Empowering Youth Through Agriculture
-
Politics21 hours agoAPC Releases Adjusted Timetable For Nationwide Congresses, Convention
-
Sports5 days agoArsenal Women End Man City’s Invincibility
-
Sports5 days agoU-20 WWC: Falconets claim qualifier win
-
Sports5 days agoInsurance Deepen Enyimba’s Trouble
-
Sports5 days agoYouth Olympics preparation Gears up
-
Sports5 days agoCologne Youth Team Set Crowd Record
-
Sports5 days agoTornadoes Set For NPFL exit over Stadium Ban
-
Sports5 days agoBarca Pull Out Of Super League Project
