Opinion
The Uzoma In Us
The sacking of the former
Comptroller-General of Immigration, Mrs Rose Chinyere Uzoma by President Goodluck Jonathan a few days ago, is expectedly generating so many reactions.
While some people, especially women activists see the action as a deliberate act of denying women opportunity to serve, others, particularly those from the South East geo-political region where Uzoma hails from see the compulsory retirement of the former Comptroller General as a way of “systematically removing Igbos from sensitive positions”. They allege that after ensuring that Jonathan emerged victorious during the last Presidential election through their votes, his reward to the South East region had been the removal of Igbos from key positions of authority.
Yet, others say Uzoma deserved the sack because she breached the rules of employment within her department. They say that anybody as tribalised as the out-gone Comptroller General deserves to be sacked.
Indeed, if the allegations of tribalism and corruption levelled against the former Comptroller General were true, she ought to be punished. Nigeria is a country of over 250 tribes and anybody in public office should always know that no tribe is more important than the other.
Every public office holder is expected to uphold the federal character principle which makes it mandatory that during an employment exercise, every state must fill its quota.
However, it will be interesting to know when Nigeria got to the realisation that upholding this principle is vital to the unity and development of the nation. Every public office holder knows what the constitution says about employment. How many of them apply it during recruitment exercises?
Check the recruitment processes in all the Ministries, parastatals, security outfits and other government establishments in Nigeria and know which one does not favour the section of the country that the head comes from.
It has become the practice for people in postions of authority to put on tribal garb be they Hausa, Ibo, Yourba, Ijaw, Kalabari, Ogoni, Efik, Urhobo and others. This is a disease that is killing competence in Nigeria Public Service both at the Federal, State and Local government levels. Go to many institutions in Nigeria, the story is the same. A new Vice Chancellor of a higher institution, a commissioner in-charge of a Ministry, the head of a parastatal will like to flood the place with his kinsmen whether they are the most qualified for such positions or not.
So, I think there is an Uzoma in every Nigerian as many of us tend to favour our kinsmen, people from the same religious background with us during employment and other exercises in our places of work, abandoning the competent, qualified hands to their fate.
A shocking revelation was made last weak when some ministeries, departments and agencies (MDAs) admitted before the Senate Committee on Federal Character that they took bribes before offering employment to applicants.
The subtle admittance which followed a question thrown to the agencies by Senator Uche Chukwumerije during a session with the Senate Committee, Federal Character Commission (FCC) as well as MDAs, was an insight into the level of corruption and rot in employment into the public service today. It reveals that such engagement goes to the “highest bidders”, who in most cases are not qualified and competent in the job while the best brains roam the streets seeking for employment.
It is therefore indeed heart-warming to believe that the President has decided to deal decisively with corrupt public officers by removing Chinyere Uzoma, the second female Comptroller General of Immigrations from office on allegations of corruption and tribalism.
However, Mr. President is expected to spread his drag net to other parastatals, ministries and outfits where Uzoma’s sin is a daily occurrence. He should prove his critics wrong by ensuring that no corrupt, tribalised public office holder goes scot-free. The current alleged practice of offering job slots to top government functionaries, law makers, military chiefs, traditional rulers during recruitment exercises should be thoroughly looked into as that can only take the nation backward instead of forward. Even distribution of jobs to states and local governments will create peace and unity among the various tribes and invariably lead to the rapid development of the country.
Calista Ezeaku
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers3 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News3 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics2 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured3 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
-
News3 days ago
FG Explains Supply Disruption As Power Generation Drops To 3,659MW
-
Metro3 days ago
Port Harcourt Prepares For 10,000 Runners As International Marathon Returns
-
News2 days agoBille Gas Leak: Coalition Tasks FG On Proactive Measures
-
News3 days agoIGP Orders Arrest, Prosecution Of Campaign Billboard Vandals
