Opinion
How Significant Is May 29?
May 29. The date
sounds ordinary, abstract even, to worth anybody’s attention, let alone sweat. Afterall, what is in a date? Nothing perhaps. Date is quite an ordinary English word, or better still a mere number on the Iunar calendar.
But in truth, date is more than an ordinary word or number in the life of a man. Life has no meaning without a date. Life, like a convenient milestone, runs on a date; the same way the twelve calendar months are punctuated by dates. There is nothing a man does that is not marked by date. There is a date for birth and a date for death. There is a date for joy and a date for sorrow. There is a date to assume office and a date to disengage. The whole life cycle of a man runs on a date.
Most times, we set the date for ourselves for what we want to do, as in getting married. Once a date is set, it becomes a social contract, more or less a bond that must be fulfilled. But sometimes, the dates are deflated by some intervening variables. In other words, no date is certain. The only date that is sure is the day of death marked for us on the calendar, by the mysterious hand, without our knowledge, let alone our approval.
Take for instance January 2, 1993, a date the Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida military junta first set for its disengagement from power. Then, the hope of having a democratically elected civilian government was high. But along the line, something went wrong, and the best plan made by man became a nullity. Then, we moved to August 27, 1993.
Again, hope – that ultimate elixir began to rise. Just as IBB was planning his exit, Nigerians too, especially the supposed major beneficiary of that date, Late M.K.O. Abiola, were anxious to see the date come to reality. August 27, 1993 therefore became a signpost every Nigerian watched with bated breath.
For the umpteenth time, the date was punctuated by the intervening variables, making the hope of having a democratic elected government on that date a forlorn one, once again.
From August 27, 1993, we shifted towards May 29, 1999.
Given the cloud of political uncertainty, May 29, 1999 looked like a date that would never come. But when eventually the date came with its ultimate fulfillment, Nigerians could not hold their joy. They rolled out drums to welcome the dawn of a new beginning. Since then, May 29 has become an epoch in the political history of Nigeria.
The question then is, if truly a date is just an ordinary word or number on the calendar that is not worth significant attachment, why then do we cloth some dates in the garb of the monumental? May be, there is something mythical, mysterious even, about them. It is this mystery, I believe, that makes May 29 wear the garb of the monumental.
I have read many people argue both on newspapers and facebook that May 29 is not the ideal Democracy Day. They would rather concede that significance to June 12 which, they say marks the day the real struggle for democracy we are enjoying today started.
While I would want to share their sentiments, given the fact that without June 12, 1993 event, there wouldn’t have been May 29, I equally concede to the fact that May 29 is significant because it carries the promise of a new beginning, not withstanding that June 12 bears the red flame of democracy.
Besides being Nigeria’s second most important day after October 1 which marks the country’s independence from colonial rule, May 29 marks the day Nigeria became liberated from the shackles of military rule that began with the 15th January, 1966 coup detat which threw up Major General Aguiyi Ironsi as the first Military Head of State. It marks the day the damning plague of military dictatorship that had cast a blight on Nigeria’s future and development for almost 35 years was destroyed and burnt to flames. So, whatever makes October 1 an epoch-making date also gives May 29 a high degree of uniqueness.
Whether or not May 29 is the ideal Democracy Day should therefore not be a festering issue for debate. What should rather disturb the discerning minds is: how have we made good use of the opportunities May 29 offers us in the last 13 years? Have we fared any better?
By my own reckoning, the progress chart in the last 13 years has not recorded high points. If at all there has been any movement on the vertical axis, it is downward. The progress chart is there for everybody to see and assess. You have the right to disagree.
Boye Salau
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Opinion3 days ago
Ancestorial Worship: My Take (1)
-
News8 hours ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
-
News8 hours agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
News3 days agoFG Must Address Nigerians’ Concerns On Reforms -Shettima …Warns Against Misuse of AI, Social Media
-
Niger Delta7 hours ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Rivers5 hours ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education6 hours agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Education6 hours agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
