Opinion
Betrayal Of The Nigerian Dream
Dreams motivate. They give energy. And they open new avenues of growth and development not only for individuals but also for communities, states, and nations. But dreams without work are like an orange in the sun that dries up sooner than later.
In 1931, James Truslow, expressed the American dream in these words: “The American dream is that dream of a land in which life should be better and richer and fuller for everyone, with opportunity for each according to ability or achievement …It is not a dream of motor cars and high wages merely, but a dream of social order in which each man and each woman shall be able to attain to the fullest stature of which they are innately capable, and be recognised by others for what they are, regardless of the fortuitous circumstances of birth or position.”
Today, there is no gain-saying the fact that American (USA), has become the economic powerhouse and the melting pot of the entire world. The people, especially the leaders, have worked assiduously over the years to make their dream-the American dream-come true.
Following India’s independence, the All India Congress Committee (AICC) constituted the Economic Programme Committee with Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru as its chairman in November 1947. The AICC had a dream of formulating a mixed economy that would propel the growth and development of India. The committee’s resolution thus stated: “Our aim should be to evolve an economic structure which will yield maximum production without the operation of private monopolies and concentration of wealth and which will create .a proper balance between urban and rural economies. Such a social structure can provide an alternative to acquisitive economy of private capitalism and the regimentation of totalitarian state.” To all intents and purposes, India has had a satisfactory growth rate over the years. Today, India’s outstanding success in the area of medical services is a puzzle to the world.
Here in Africa, South Africa that held its first multiracial elections in 1994, is now setting an unprecedented economic development pace on the continent. With the dream to lift the country to an enviable height, Nelson Mandela, the first post-apartheid president, and his African National Congress (ANC) government started with restoring order to an economy that had been torn apart by sanctions and integrating the hitherto disadvantaged section of the populace into it.
Today, South Africa has a solid macro-economic structure that competes favourably with some of the advanced countries in the areas of telecommunications, transportation, financial system, investment, and stock exchange.
Now, what is the Nigerian dream? The Nigerian dream is very well captured by the five national objectives of the country. The national objectives as identified in the Second National Development Plan (1970 -75) are: to establish Nigeria firmly as a united, strong, and self-reliant nation, a great and dynamic economy, a just and egalitarian society, a land of bright and full opportunity for all citizens, and free and democratic society.
Besides, Nigeria has had several other development strategies and vision which have also stated its dream. For instance, on November 27, 1996, -the then Head of State and Commander-in- Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federation, General Sani Abacha, set up a 248- member committee to develop a blueprint that would transform the country into a developed nation by the year 2010. The body, known as Vision 2010 Committee, worked for 10 months and concluded that with efficient and effective management of the country’s abundant human and natural resources, including oil and gas, Nigeria would have by 2010 become “a united, industrious, caring, and God-fearing democratic society, committed to making the basic needs of life affordable for everyone, and creating Africa’s leading economy”.
But the truth is that the Nigerian dream is like the task of Tantalus – the target keeps receding. The country is still a land of poverty, public power failure, religious crisis, political intolerance, corruption, unemployment, and high rate of dependency burden. It is a disorderly, inefficient, and callous place.
So, why has the realisation of the Nigerian dream become a mirage? The failure in realising the Nigerian dream is not the result of a curse by God, satan or natural disasters. The trouble with Nigeria is its self delusion that the country will miraculously become great without great efforts and self discipline by both the leaders and followers. It was the former president Umaru Musa Yar’Adua, who said: “The concept of leadership has been bastardised in Nigeria. People (now) use leadership positions to show arrogance, oppress others, and misappropriate resources meant for the generality of Nigerians, instead of serving them as directed by God” .
Thus, Nigeria is a negation of USA, India, South Africa, China, South Korea, Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, and other countries whose leaders consider their offices as public trusts, bestowed for good of the nation and not for the benefits of individuals or groups of people. Is it not shameful that since its over 50 years of nationhood, Nigeria has not emerged as a leading light to the world in any area of political and socio-economic development. Is it not disturbing that many of our leaders are being chased around both within and outside the country for corruption, stealing, and misappropriation of public funds. And is it not mortifying that the country has not been able to conduct free, fair and credible elections over the years.
The Nigerian dream has been betrayed by the inordinate passion for power and wealth of many of our leaders who have continued to squander golden opportunities and scarce resources for the growth, development, and democratic evolution of the country.
It has become apparent that an abundance of human and natural resources can not manifest the Nigerian dream if we continue to resist the required economic and attitudinal changes for the progress of the nation.
The Nigeria dream is realisable but we must be prepared for the changes; we must be prepared to pay the price.
Opinion
Professor Kamene Okonjo: A Life Beyond Motherhood
Quote “Professor Kamene Okonjo
Some women leave behind more t
Yet, to remember Professor Kam
Professor Okonjo was the belov
one of the most dramatic chapt
On December 14, 2012, the then
She leaves behind children, gr
Professor Kamene Okonjo deserv
By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
Opinion
On Ancestrial Worship: My Take
Quote: An African who invokes
This is the concluding part
… Given the fact that I was
At the end of the visit by the
Back to my apartment, at abo
Under normal circumstances, yo
That all she asks is that Chie
For some reason that I do not
I believe that everyone in hu
Our ancestors have not gone fa
By: Jason Osai
Opinion
FG’s Transport Support And Rivers Workers
The Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 monthly transport intervention for public service workers for six months, beginning in November 2026, offers hope to employees struggling with the rising cost of living. The agreement with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), reached at a conciliation meeting in Abuja on October 27, is intended to cushion transport costs and ease pressure on workers’ incomes. But for public servants in Rivers State, it raises a familiar question: will the State Government key into the intervention and ensure that its workers benefit? The agreement provides for N70,000 monthly across all levels, for six months. The Federal Government also approved peculiar allowance arrears effective from May 1, 2026, to be paid in three equal instalments beginning in November.
The parties agreed to reconvene after one month to assess implementation. Ultimately, the value of these resolutions will be measured not by announcements but by whether eligible workers receive the money. Transport costs consume a substantial share of many civil servants’ earnings before they can meet household needs. Support for commuting is therefore not a luxury or political favour; it is temporary assistance to help workers remain at their jobs without sinking further into hardship. For lower-paid employees, transport costs can turn modest salaries into a daily exercise in difficult choices and sacrifice.
The agreement also urges State and Local Governments to participate and unions to press for implementation. The federal agreement does not automatically guarantee that every State and Local Government employee will receive the support. State authorities must clarify how it will apply to their workforce, make the necessary arrangements and publish a payment timetable. Rivers State must approach the arrangement with urgency and transparency. The Government should State whether it will implement the intervention and when payments will begin. Any administrative or financial question should be addressed promptly with organised labour, not allowed to become excuses for delay.
The concern is sharpened by the earlier N35,000 monthly wage award introduced by the Federal Government in 2023 after petrol subsidy removal. It was intended as temporary relief pending a new national minimum wage. While several States negotiated and paid wage awards or related sums, implementation nationwide was uneven. Reports in 2024 indicated that many States had failed to pay the federal award, while others provided different amounts. In Rivers, labour and media reports raised concerns about implementation of the N35,000 award for State workers, amid separate announcements and arrangements concerning Local Government employees.
The wage award was meant to ease the immediate effects of subsidy removal, yet workers faced uncertainty over whether the promised relief would reach them. In February 2024, the Rivers State Government announced approval of the N35,000 award for local government workers, but subsequent reports showed that implementation across worker categories remained a concern. The lesson is clear: approval and implementation are not the same. A declaration at a meeting offers little comfort to a worker whose account does not reflect the promised payment. For workers who travel to their offices daily, the implications of delayed support are significant. Transportation expenses compete with food, rent, school fees, healthcare and other essential household needs.
As fares rise, employees may be forced to reduce spending on necessities or borrow to sustain their families. A timely transport intervention would therefore provide practical relief and demonstrate that government understands the economic pressures confronting its workforce. Its temporary nature makes prompt implementation even more important. It is fair to acknowledge that this transport intervention is a new agreement and that its administrative details may require clarification. Rivers State should not be condemned in advance for a failure that has not occurred. Nevertheless, the earlier experience gives workers legitimate grounds to seek assurances before the November commencement date. The State should avoid allowing uncertainty to persist until workers begin asking why the promised assistance has not arrived.
The NLC and unions in Rivers State should engage the State Government immediately and seek a written commitment, an implementation plan and a process for reporting missed payments. If clarification from the Federal Government is needed, the State should seek it without abandoning the goal of providing relief. Labour leaders must also keep members informed about progress and insist that any agreed arrangements are applied fairly and transparently. The Rivers State Government should treat this intervention as an opportunity to rebuild confidence. Timely support would show that workers’ welfare is more than a talking point and that the State recognises the economic realities confronting its employees.
Silence, delay or selective implementation, by contrast, would revive frustration over earlier relief measures and weaken trust between government and labour. Every month lost to administrative delay leaves workers facing the same transport burden without the intended assistance. The State should consult labour, publish arrangements and pay eligible workers on time. Rivers workers should not have to wonder whether federal relief will reach them. The Federal Government has announced the support; now the State must make its position clear. We hope the N70,000 monthly transport intervention will not follow the troubling path of the earlier wage award. Rivers State should learn from that experience and ensure that this time, relief is not merely promised but delivered.
Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi
-
Rivers5 days ago
Don Seeks Repositioning Of Tech Education For Dev
-
Education5 days agoPAMO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY -Nullifies Arrest warrant on VC
-
Niger Delta5 days ago
PANDEF Seeks 50% Oil Derivation Allocation Increase
-
Education5 days agoIAUE MOVES TO END GHOST WORKERS SYNDROME AS 400 NEW NON-TEACHING STAFF UNDERGO MANDATORY ETHICS TRAINING
-
News5 days agoFresh Ebola Scare As NCDC Records Two Cases
-
Rivers20 hours ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News20 hours agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
News5 days ago
Customs Partners EFCC, NDLEA, Others To Tackle Money Laundering, Terrorism Financing
