Editorial
That Food Crisis Alert
About three weeks ago, the Minister of Agriculture, Professor Sheikh Abdullah, was said to have shrugged off a United Nations report which had warned of a possible food crisis in Nigeria.
In fact, the report, published by the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), had indicated that Nigeria, Morocco and Bangladesh were among countries that are currently vulnerable to food crisis.
Abdullah’s main grouse was that the UN agency never sought his ministerial opinion or that of any stakeholder in the country’s agricultural sector before going public with its report. He was, therefore, said to have dismissed the report as one that was based on mere assumption and insufficient analysis.
But even as the minister condemned the report and its authors, he was quick to admit that post-harvest losses were among factors militating against the attainment of food security and sufficiency in Nigeria. According to him, the present administration is very much aware of the global food crisis and efforts are already ongoing to reposition the nation’s agricultural sector in a more sustainable manner.
While dismissing the report, the minister had drawn attention to some agricultural programmes that are already being pursued by the government to help avert a food crisis in the country. He particularly mentioned the Commercial Agricultural Development Programme (CADP), FADAMA III, NERICA Rice Project and the IFAD –assisted Rural Finance Institutions Progamme, among others.
Much as we would want to agree with the honourable minister concerning his right to fair hearing, let’s also quickly remind him that he is surely not under any administrative or judicial probe as yet.
Indeed, and as is characteristic of such international bodies, we want to believe that the FAO analysts may have tried to base their analysis on the scope and viability of projects that are already on the ground if only to avoid having their findings tainted by the submissions of political officeholders.
We are also aware that as part of late President Umaru Yar’Adua’s 7-point Agenda, the Federal Government had in 2008 launched the National Programme for Agriculture and Food Security (NPAFS) which was to signal a fresh commitment to agriculture and food security in Nigeria.
The Tide is, however, worried that even before the controversial FAO report, there had been concerns regarding the mode of implementation of some of these new agricultural initiatives. For instance, the World Bank recently expressed dissatisfaction over the implementation of its $185 million commercial agriculture projects in Nigeria.
In fact, the country team leader, Louis Akapa, while commenting on some of the projects sited in Cross River, Enugu, Kaduna, Kano and Lagos States, noted that the programme which was designed for commercial farmers who already possess the necessary equipment and experience to engage in large-scale agriculture is now being run as a small-farmer scheme.
It is also known that the much-touted FADAMA programme has fared no better. As a programme which depends on a contributory funding arrangement, default by any of the participating contributors is sure to constitute a setback. It therefore goes without saying that, laudable as the programme is, most of the nation’s farmers are yet to benefit from it because their respective state and local governments have failed to remit the required counterpart funds.
Rather than seeing the food crisis report as an indictment on the authorities, The Tide would wish that government considers it as a wake-up call to redouble whatever effort it may have made so far toward ensuring that Nigerians are spared any sad experiences resulting from the current global food shortage.
We fear that if the global food crisis persists, it will naturally lead to an enormous international demand pressure on the few available food sources which will, in turn, cause a huge price hike. Again, with a population of about 150 million, 65 per cent of which is already poverty-stricken, Nigeria surely titters on the brink of a crisis characterised by massive hunger, malnutrition and wanton death.
The nation’s vast arable land and conducive climate have always favoured the cultivation of such food crops as yam, cassava, rice, cocoyam, plantain, millet, maize, potatoes, and a variety of fruits and vegetables like oranges, bananas, tomatoes, water melon, cucumber, onions, etc. It is, therefore, absurd that Nigeria still considers it a worthwhile option to engage in massive food importation for which she was said to have spent an average of about $25.72 billion in 2008 and 2009.
Viewed against the backdrop of recent global uprisings ignited by rising food costs, it becomes instructive that Nigerians should take seriously any expert opinions about an impending food shortage, moreso now that the symptoms are already staring everyone in the face.
The situations in Haiti, Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt, Zimbabwe, Kenya, Somalia and a number of other countries were equally foreseen by the same international analysts prior to their eventual occurrence.
We, therefore, think that now is the time for Nigerians to wake up and ensure a sustained development of the nation’s food sector in a manner that guarantees strategic reserves which can be deployed at such very dire times as the FAO forewarns.
Editorial
HYPREP And The Collapsed Water Tank
Editorial
Resurgence Of Illegal Structures In PH
Editorial
Certificate Forgery, Loss Of Public Trust
