Editorial
Checking Terror Attacks: A Welcome Breather
Considering the seemingly intractable nature of terror-based attacks on the Nigeria State and the debatable helplessness of security structure in the land last year, it is indeed a breath of fresh air to hear that an end to the spate of insecurity may soon be near. Coming from two Presidents and Commanders-In-Chief, the assurances indeed require considering.
Speaking at two different fora last Sunday in both Abuja and Abeakuta, President Goodluck Jonathan and former President Olusegun Obasanjo respectively, for the first time struck same cord on national security when they separately averred that the Federal Government was gradually winning the war against terror in the land.
While Jonathan used the serenity of a Christian place of worship to express his optimism, Obasanjo chose a peace meeting among the four sectional traditional rulers in Egbaland, in Abeokuta.
At a church service in Abuja, last Sunday, President Jonathan assured Nigerians of a safer Nigeria this year, and reiterated government’s determination to effectively curtail terrorist attacks by the Islamist extremist group Boko Haram. On his part, former President Obasanjo before Egba Natural rulers expressed optimism that Nigeria would soon overcome all the security challenges currently confronting her.
Giving specifics at a church service at the Ekklisiya Yaruma Nigeria (EYN-Church of the Brethren of Nigeria), Utako, Abuja, President Jonathan told worshippers that the Federal Government had not only changed strategy on the anti-terror war, but that it had also introduced fresh measures to curtail attacks by the Islamist sect. Although he did not elaborate further, the President declared that the fresh measures had started yielding the desired results and assured that government would do everything possible to ensure that the activities of Boko Haram did not cause inertia in governance in 2013.
“Boko Haram planned to carry out a lot of attacks on Christmas Day, but we suppressed their plans during the Christmas holidays and most of their plans were not executed because of the strategies put in place by the security agencies, which aborted the efforts.
“Although we still recorded some incidents, the extent of attacks which they had planned, we did not allow them to execute them,” the President stated.
These views were later corroborated by Information and Communication Minister, Labaran Maku, who, in a media chat on National radio, revealed that many leaders of the Boko Haram terror group, had either been arrested or killed. But understandably, considering the sensitive nature of national security, the minster did not give further specifics as to the identity of the terrorists or government’s fresh plans to curtail their activities.
However, considering the fearful and systemic nature of terrorist siege on Nigeria that has claimed more than 3,000 lives and property worth billions of naira, such fresh assurances on success of war on terror should naturally be taken with a pinch of salt. After all, many would argue, worse attacks had taken place after similar assurances by highly placed Nigerians and indeed government officials, on improved security.
This is indeed why the Federal Government must let Nigerians see the most recent assurance as indeed different from the rest before it. Whatever fresh strategies now introduced and believed to be paying-off must not only be sustained but be expanded to make terrorism an unfashionable past-time, to avoid the imminent inertia we fear.
The Federal Government needs not be reminded that one of its primary responsibilities to the citizenry, is the protection of lives and property, without which any administration, be it state’s or local government’s loses its legitimacy in governance. Last year unfortunately, the Boko Haram siege nearly succeeded in implanting such question on the minds of the people.
This is why The Tide considers the recent reassurance of a safer Nigeria in 2013 as a fresh challenge not only to government but also to the citizenry alike. To secure a nation, it requires a vigilant citizenry, a proactive government and a reliable security system to succeed.
Without doubt, the consistent terror attacks of last year depicted the lack of such imperatives, their short supply and or the absence of a dependable intelligence mechanism required to nip in the bud, such near frequent attacks. This is why the people must be involved in the new war on terror while the security establishments must work harder to earn the confidence and support of the ordinary Nigerian.
It is when both government and the governed together, appreciate the extent of the danger the nation faces and jointly tackle such mutual threat, that the war on terror can be won. One way to achieve that is continuous sensitisation of the citizenry and improved communication.
Even so, judging by the relative peace enjoyed during the Christmas season, The Tide shares the optimism expressed by the government but will insist that broader and more extensive policing be institutionalised in a manner that not only totally prevents terror-based attacks but also checks the increasing spate of criminality in the country. That is the only way to make any meaning out of the fresh assurances given by the Federal Government in securing of lives and property in 2013 and beyond.
While The Tide commends the various security establishments for the modest success recorded during the festivities in ensuring safety of lives and property we find it equally instructive to further challenge them to do even more if Nigeria will truly be safer as promised.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics2 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics2 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics2 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
Rivers5 days ago
NUJ Set To Attend UNIPORT’s 217th Inaugural Lecture
-
News2 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
News5 days agoNJC Suspends Three Judges, Sanctions Eight Others
-
Politics5 days ago
Atiku Kicks-Off 2027 Campaign, Promises To Tackle Nigeria’s Challenges
-
Featured5 days agoAPC Presidential Campaign Storms PH, ‘Morrow
