Editorial

Niger Republic: Need For Caution

Published

2 years ago

August 4, 2023

The military intervention in Niger Republic on July 27 aligns with a prevailing pattern observed within the
Sahel region. Mali and Burkina Faso, both erstwhile reputable democratic governments, have similarly suffered from the turmoil of regime overthrow. Alarming as it may be, this recent coup represents the seventh occurrence of such military takeovers within a remarkably short span of less than three years.
Evidently, these unsettling events significantly impair the progress of democracy within one of the most economically disadvantaged regions globally. Consequently, it becomes imperative for the international community to isolate those who have seized power in Niamey and actively convey a resounding message, discouraging any inclination towards violent disruptions of legitimate governance.
Some ambitious Nigerien soldiers have quizzed President Mohamed Bazoum, citing insecurity, poor governance, and mishandling of the Islamist insurgency. The soldiers, led by Abdourahamane Tchiani, Bazoum’s commander of the elite Presidential Guard, have declared him as new head of state and have detained over 140 politicians. This adds Niger to the ever-expanding collection of armed rules in the West Africa’s Sahel region.
The accretion in military coups in Africa has raised apprehension about the erosion of democracy. Since 2010, there have been more than 40 coups and attempted plots, with 20 occurring in West Africa and the Sahel region, including Chad. Undeterred by difficult geopolitical circumstances with insurgencies, extremism, and armed revolts, Niger has experienced four military administrations since its independence in 1960, while managing to hold three democratic elections since 2011.
Niger, the largest landlocked country in West Africa, has a population of 25 million and is predominantly Muslim. The Sahara Desert covers more than 80 per cent of the nation’s land area. The country faces challenges from Islamist insurgencies originating from Mali and North Eastern Nigeria. Its many successful coups in the past three years have consistently caused global concern.
Expectedly, the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), the United Nations (UN), the European Union (EU), the African Union (AU), and the international community have condemned the bullish takeover of power in the West African country and have effected sanctions. UN Secretary-General António Guterres, criticised the coup, urging the need for restraint and adherence to constitutional order. He denounced any efforts to attenuate democratic governance, peace, and stability in Niger.
Nigeria’s President Bola Tinubu, chairman of ECOWAS, also condemned the iniquitous government change. We denunciate the coup and are deeply distressed about the series of coups in the region. The incessant military overthrows whittle away the progress being made towards democracy on the continent. We reject these actions and join the global community in demanding the immediate restoration of democracy in Niger and other affected countries.
Rising from an emergency meeting in Abuja, chaired by Tinubu on July 30, ECOWAS announced a lockdown of the land and air borders between member countries and Niger. The regional body has issued a seven-day ultimatum for the restoration of deposed President Bazoum to office. Furthermore, the West African body has frozen enterprises, parastatals, and commercial banks in Niger, as well as restricted the country’s access to its institutions.
Niger hazards a proxy confrontation by major powers if ECOWAS’ military threat of invasion is enforced. Russian Wagner mercenary army, active in Burkina Faso, Mali, Guinea, Central African Republic, and Sudan, has been accused by Bazoum of backing the mutineers and disseminating misinformation about his government. Clearly, Putin and his Wagner army have a foothold in Niger. Russia’s involvement in Nigerien affairs must be checked.
Guinea, Burkina Faso, and Mali view any ECOWAS military incursion in Niger as a declaration of war, which could worsen the already fragile situation in the region. Analysts caution that if ECOWAS and AU fail to handle diplomacy properly, renegade regimes might align with Russia and its Wagner army. To avoid this, it is essential to implement smart and flexible diplomacy that isolates the military juntas and prevents foreign powers from gaining influence.
President Tinubu must exercise discretion when addressing the situation in the embattled country to prevent the failure of law and order. Military intervention could worsen the imbroglio and potentially lead to civil anarchy. Instead, diplomatic engagements and sanctions should be vigorously pursued to pressure the soldiers to relinquish power or communicate a timeline for the restoration of democracy.
Nigeria’s military is currently engaged in internal security operations across all 36 states, combatting various threats such as international terrorists, bandits, pirates, and secessionists. Given the country’s economic and security crises, military intervention in a foreign war, particularly with Niger, is unwise and not feasible. Urgent measures are necessary, but the military option is not viable because of its over-stretched capacity.
Frequent military incursions in the sub-region are a direct consequence of the lack of expected economic and infrastructural development under democratic rule. Foreign interests exploit this situation to trigger insurrection in Niger and other nations. The key solution remains in effective governance to hold back soldiers in barracks.
The events in Niger should serve as a wake-up call for Nigeria. It is crucial for the African giant to give precedence to legitimacy and exemplary governance. The sentiments encompassing the last general elections play up the need to address electoral fraud. The Nigerian government must recognise that military coups are still a possibility. To prevent such actions, it is essential for democracy and good governance to thrive in the country, and elections must be conducted with credibility.
Military coups in Africa have detrimental effects on stability and socio-economic development, undermining democratic governance, civil liberties, and human rights. Additionally, they erode public trust and investor confidence. To address persistent coups, African leaders must shun sit-tight mentality in office, prioritise good governance, establish robust civil institutions, uphold the rule of law, and ensure accountability. Tinubu must exercise control over his defiance and prevent any attempts of incautation in Niger.

Editorial

Charge Before New Rivers Council Helmsmen

Published

3 days ago

September 29, 2025

The Tide

On the 30th of August, Rivers people trooped out to participate in local government elections conducted across the state. These elections, which produced new chairmen and councillors for the 23 local government areas (LGAs), were organised by the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission (RSIEC). The exercise has ushered in a new crop of grassroots leaders whose shoulders now bear the responsibility of steering the affairs of their respective councils. With the polls concluded and winners duly announced, the time has come for the newly elected officials to roll up their sleeves and begin the hard work of governance.

According to the results declared by RSIEC, the All Progressives Congress (APC) secured a dominant lead, winning chairmanship seats in 20 of the 23 local government councils, while the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) clinched the remaining three. This outcome not only reflects the current political dynamics in the state but also places a significant weight of expectation on the shoulders of the APC-led councils to justify the confidence reposed in them by the electorate. It is imperative that political rhetoric now gives way to tangible development, especially at the grassroots level where government is felt most directly.

Following the elections, the successful chairmen were officially sworn into office by the former Sole Administrator of Rivers State, Vice Admiral (rtd) Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas. The solemn ceremony marked a transition from campaign promises to the reality of public service. With their inauguration complete, the time for celebration has ended; the time for delivery has commenced. The electorate now awaits meaningful action that reflects the hopes and aspirations of the voting public.

As helmsmen of their various LGAs, these leaders must quickly settle down to work. Their constituents expect them to provide direction, formulate policies, and execute programmes that will uplift communities long neglected. The local government tier is closest to the people and, as such, must rise above politicking to meet the everyday needs of the citizenry. It is not enough to occupy office; they must make their impact visibly and positively felt across their domains.

The Supreme Court ruling mandating direct allocation of funds to local governments—although not yet fully implemented—is a welcome development that underscores the autonomy of the third tier of government. Once this is operationalised, the excuses often cited for underperformance will no longer hold water. With funds directly accessed from the Federation Account, council administrations will be better empowered to meet the developmental needs of their localities, if only they manage resources judiciously and prioritise the right projects.

The onus is now on the chairmen to contribute meaningfully to the broader development of Rivers State. The state government cannot and should not be expected to do everything. Local government councils have defined responsibilities—ranging from rural infrastructure, primary healthcare, and basic education to waste management and local security—that must be adequately addressed. It is high time they stopped passing the buck and started acting as the elected leaders they are.

We extend our congratulations to all who emerged victorious in the elections. However, with this victory comes great responsibility. It is no longer about party affiliations or electoral campaigns; it is about governance. The chairmen must launch people-centred projects that will genuinely improve the lives of the rural populace—projects in water supply, road maintenance, school renovation, and youth empowerment, among others. Let their tenure be remembered for its impact, not its slogans.

Central to their mandate should be the welfare of workers. Council employees form the engine room of local governance, and their morale significantly affects service delivery. The new chairmen must ensure regular payment of salaries, staff training, and a conducive working environment. Neglecting this vital aspect will only hinder whatever grand plans they may have for their LGAs.

It is also essential to institute a robust peer review mechanism. The new LG officials should not operate in isolation; rather, they should learn from one another, share ideas, and compete constructively in a bid to outperform each other in service delivery. Healthy competition among council areas will drive innovation and foster accelerated development. Such a system will also help the public identify high-performing councils for emulation.

Given the typically short tenure of council administrations, it is crucial that they focus on projects that are realistic and impactful. Time and resources should not be wasted on white elephant ventures that are neither sustainable nor beneficial to the people. Instead, chairmen should pursue programmes that match their timelines and address immediate community needs.

Peace and security must remain a cardinal objective for all council steersmen. Regardless of who facilitated their election or what political loyalties they hold, they must ensure peace reigns in their areas. Development cannot thrive in an atmosphere of tension and distrust. These leaders must work closely with traditional rulers, youth groups, and civil society organisations to maintain law and order.

A critical understanding must also prevail—that chairmen are leaders of the people, not just leaders of political parties. They must conduct themselves as impartial administrators serving all constituents, irrespective of political affiliations. Additionally, they must work harmoniously with the state governor, who remains the leader of the state. Petty rivalries and political infighting serve no purpose in the development agenda.

Now that the elections are over and governance has begun, it is essential for these chairmen and councillors to adopt an inclusive approach. They must carry everyone along—party members and opposition alike—in their development plans. Creating division or playing favourites will only fracture communities and stall progress. Leadership at the grassroots demands fairness, equity, and a listening ear.

Rivers people have played their part by coming out to vote. The baton has now been passed to the new council helmsmen. They must seize the opportunity to leave lasting legacies in their communities. History will not judge them by the number of rallies they held or the speeches they gave, but by the quality of life they brought to their people. Let them not squander this moment.

Editorial

No To Political Office Holders’ Salary Hike

Published

1 week ago

September 22, 2025

The Tide

Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.

What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.

It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.

According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.

The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?

In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.

We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.

The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.

Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.

Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.

Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.

This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.