Editorial
Between HYPREP And Ogoni
Except urgent steps are taken, there may be another round of crisis in Ogoni, Rivers State, as a youth group under the aegis of Ogoni Development Drive (ODD) has called on President Muhammadu Buhari to sack the Acting Project Coordinator of Hydrocarbon Pollution Remediation Programme (HYPREP), Prof. Philip Shekwolo.
The body is requesting for Shekwolo’s sack following what they construed as ‘injustice’, noting that “Ogonis did not die for a Kogi man to come and head their affairs.” ODD, at a media briefing in Bori, Khana Local Government Area of Rivers State, urged Buhari to replace Shekwolo with a qualified Ogoni son to head HYPREP and maintained that Ogoni had a great collection of people academically qualified to head the agency.
A statement by the ODD leader, Solomon Lenu, declared that as an ethnic group that suffered deprivation, they knew where it hurt them and argued that Shekwolo lacked the moral footing to oversee a clean-up programme which he had in the past defended Shell’s complicity in the oil spill in Ogoniland. He pledged the group’s preparedness to halt Shekwolo from becoming a substantive Project Coordinator of HYPREP.
“I am sad today because the present Project Coordinator of HYPREP, Professor Phillip Shekwolo, a former staff of Shell, the company at the epicentre of the oil crisis in Ogoniland, was made an acting PC to correct the wrongs generated by his predecessor, Dr Marvin Dekil, but he (Shekwolo) had since deviated to fest his nest on the common patrimony of the dying Ogoni people.
“It will interest you to know that since his appointment in an acting capacity, rather than focusing on what would bring a solution to the myriad of problems confronting Ogonis, Shekwolo only devotes his stay in HYPREP to bribe people to support his confirmation as the HYPREP substantive PC,” Lenu said.
While we remain responsive to ODD’s stand on Shekwolo’s acting assignment, we advise the Ogonis to grant peace a chance and care less about who heads HYPREP since the organisation’s mandate extends beyond Ogoniland. The clean-up agency is not just for Ogonis, but for all the people in the Niger Delta and beyond. Therefore, anyone from the region or outside could be appointed to head the agency.
Rather than feud over who heads HYPREP, the people of Ogoni should unite to enable them to pull through their numerous uncoordinated and disordered agitations. New thinking and strategies are required to prosecute their demands. By constantly shutting out others from their affairs, the Ogonis may succeed in foreclosing their chances of heading critical federal agencies outside the region.
Stakeholders and youth in Ogoniland should close ranks and strengthen HYPREP for a successful clean-up exercise in the area. This would amount to a legacy of the Ogoni struggles handed over to the coming generations. Their shared commitment should be to ensure that at the conclusion of the clean-up, Ogoni will be transformed environmentally and economically into a more prosperous and harmonious community.
Though the HYPREP project is not the exclusive preserve of the Ogoni people, indigenes of the area should be considered first in employment and skill acquisition. While it is expedient for the Ogonis to cooperate with HYPREP in the clean-up exercise, the agency should employ the youths of the area as environmental surveillance officers and other befitting positions.
The Ogoni environmental assessment would not have been conceivable without the persistence and tenacity of the Ogoni struggle for survival. Now that the world has demonstrated greater commitment than ever before to the Ogoni issues, the Movement for the Survival of Ogoni People (MOSOP) must rise to the task. If the clean-up and rehabilitation of Ogoni fail, then Kenule Saro-Wiwa and the many others who lost their lives would have died in vain.
This is the time to organise and strategise to accomplish maximum benefit for the people of the region. It is not enough to criticise virtually all about the remediation exercise; MOSOP must set a definite plan to thoroughly back and help accelerate the process for the restoration of Ogoniland. This will be a befitting legacy of the Ogoni struggle that can be proudly bequeathed to subsequent generations
MOSOP and every other group in the area, including stakeholders, should come together and assist HYPREP in mobilising the people to wholly support the clean-up schedule. For this to work, political resentments and intra or inter-ethnic issues must be flung to the rear burner. There is a need to rally the entire area for the strategy to be successful.
HYPREP must come up with a plan to fully co-opt the varied groups such as social, religious, cultural, among others, to drive their members to raise awareness of the people regarding the remediation exercise. MOSOP should further publicise every schedule and activity of HYPREP and gather inputs and opinions on the methods and progress of the process.
Ogoni is a fraction of the Niger Delta, and the outcome of the cleaning programme will reflect what will possibly happen to the other myriad issues of environmental degradation across the region. The success of this plan will help significantly and provide a useful framework to facilitate and enhance the restoration scheme for other polluted areas in the Niger Delta.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics3 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics3 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics3 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News4 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Business3 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Politics3 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
