Connect with us

Opinion

Nehemiah Nigeriana

Published

on

Some countries across the globe have wondered, and perhaps feel disappointed, that hitherto Nigeria has not disintegrated, contrary to some earlier predictions. With a news headline: “Nigeria@60: We May Break Up, FG Admits” (The Tide newspaper, Monday 28/9/2020), the Vice President, Prof. Yemi Osinbajo, was quoted as saying: “There’s urgent need for Nehemiah in our country, Nigeria, today.” What would a Nigerian Nehemiah do? The answer, according to the Vice President is: “to rebuild the cracks we have in our walls (Nigeria) today”. Cracks, but not a broken wall yet!
What caused the cracks that could lead to break if not properly addressed? Although we were told that the Vice President spoke through the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Boss Mustapha, at the 60th Independence Anniversary Church Service held at the National Ecumenical Centre, Abuja on Sunday September 27, 2020, other persons also spoke their minds. There was a sermon by President of the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN), Dr Samson Ayokunle, whose summary was that: “We need to do away with lack of trust in order to build a great nation”.
No great nation can be built under a condition of lack of trust. So, the cracks in the walls of the Nigerian nation can be attributed to mutual distrust, among other anomalies. Reference to a Nehemiah came about as a metaphor, a rebuilder of broken-down walls; a preserver of a tottering Biblical nation. We are told that Nehemiah “started with fervent prayers, seeking the face of God and pleaded with his king to allow him return to Jerusalem to rebuild the broken walls.”
A man who would say and do such a thing as Nehemiah, must have a great love, patriotism and loyalty for his country. So, the theme of the Independence Anniversary church service in Abuja, was The Rise of A Nehemia For Nigeria. Let’s call him “Nehemiah Nigeriana”.
Such a hero would not be imposed on the Nigerian nation, rather, in the opinion of CAN, prayers are needed for such rescue process. Osinbajo encouraged Nigerians to study the story of Nehemiah and replicate same in Nigeria for a better country. Quite a challenging task!
Apart from an urgent need for such a national hero, the VP went on to say: “And like Nehemiah faced opposition in his efforts to rebuild the walls, any Nigerian that desires to rebuild Nigeria must also be ready to face stiffer oppositions which will come in torrents.” How and from where would such a national hero arise? The answer lies in prayers. The task and prayers of such a national Nehemiah and those who would back him up should include issues of a proposed Water Resources Bill which the Ijaw Group rejects. The rejection of the bill hinges on distrust and suspicion that it has some hidden agenda and motives.
The tasks of Nehemiah Nigeriana would also include the old whispering of War Indemnity secretly imposed on the South-East and South-South parts of Nigeria arising from the Civil War 1967-1970, for which the Niger Delta people have been on the receiving end of acts of injustice ever since. The Nigerian Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI) and Senator Ita Enang would tell us that “Northerners owned 83% of all Nigeria’s Oil Blocks”.
One of the causes of the cracks in the walls of the Nigerian nation arose from the issue of national security which is not only delicate but shrouded in secrecy and suspicion also. Why, for instance, were the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) tagged terrorists and proscribed, while Boko Haram “militants” are being de-radicalised and re-cycled into the army and police? Similarly, vigilante groups in southern parts of Nigeria are being asked to surrender fire arms meant for soldiers at war, with no one withdrawing same or asking how herdsmen came by such weapons.
The issue of application of double standards and abuse of due process or the rule of law in various cases are glaring enough to cause some cracks in the walls of the nation’s unstable house. From the investigation of allegations of corruption, to giving protection to politicians who decamp to the party in power, Nigerians feel betrayed and bitter. Do we not observe discriminations, double standards and abuses in strategic appointments, revenue disbursements, project allocations, issues about solid minerals vis-à-vis mineral oil and gas, etc?
Why not an open inquiry into an allegation made by Obadiah Mailafia about possible sponsorship of Boko Haram, and why the foot-dragging over the calls for a restructuring of the polity? Have there not been old allegations about doctoring of population figures in the past, for political and revenue allocation purposes? Is there no lack of trust between the Presidency and the Nigerian masses? The issue of spirited movement of cattle into farmlands in the South and open grazing also add to the cracks.
A gift of N150 billion to cattle breeders and merchants by the Federal Government could have been invested in a way to reduce open grazing and the animosity between crop farmers and herders. But questions arising from that angle remain unanswered, thus creating more cracks in the walls which a Nehemiah should rebuild. Coupled with that is the planned construction of a rail line to link Nigeria with its neighbour, Niger Republic, to be financed through a loan. Are fingers not pointing towards boosting of cattle business? What value does that proposed rail-line represent and whose interests are being served thereby?
Hitherto, issues raised by ex-President Olusegun Obasanjo about Islamisation, Fulanisation and Sharia controversies in a democratic Nigeria are treated as baseless speculations. Nobody has been told that the leader of the Fulani Nationality Movement (FUNAM), Badu Salisu Ahmadu, was invited for a chat by security agents after his outburst months ago. But Mailafia was radical enough to be invited twice for a chat! Who’s afraid of an open inquiry? True federalism!
Without mincing words, one of the causes of the cracks on the walls of the Nigerian nation is a lingering suspicion that indigenes of the Niger Delta zone, as a strategy of oil politics, are being used by power holders to undermine the collective interests of their people. A stable and strong nation cannot be built by the application of divide-and-rule strategy. Either we are striving to be one, based on justice, or we are divided based on shenanigans and duplicity. There is no way a Nehemiah can emerge in such condition. Love and patriotism go with justice! Then add Nehemiah.
Dr. Amirize is a retired lecturer from the Rivers State University, Port Harcourt.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Trans-Kalabari  Road:  Work In Progress 

Published

on

Quote:”This Dream project  is one of  the best things that have happened  to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas in recent times.”
This is the concluding part of this story featured in our last edition.
Good road network helps farmers to convey their agro-allied products to  commercial hubs where buyers and sellers meet periodically to transact business. Road network engineers and motivates people resident in unfriendly geographical terrains, like riverine areas,  to own property and shuttle home with ease. Some people will prefer living in their own houses in a more serene and nature-blessed communities to living in the city that is fraught with  pollution, and other environmental, social and economic hazards. Prior to the cult epidemic that ravaged parts of Rivers State, the Emohuas, Elemes, Ogonis, and Etches were known for rural dwelling. Most public servants from these areas do their official and private transactions from  their villages. For them it was comparatively easier to live in the village and engage in a diversified economic endeavours through farming, fishing or other lucrative business without outrageous charges and embarrassment associated with doing business in Port Harcourt, where land is as scarce as the traditional needle.
That is why the decision to construct the Trans-Kalabari Road by the administration of Dr. Peter Odili was one of the best decisions that administration took. When Dr. Odili vacated office as the Rivers State Governor, Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi took over and awarded contracts for continuation of the road project which in my considered view is the felt need of  the people of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. Unfortunately, Rt. Hon. Amaechi’s efforts to drive the project was sabotaged by some contractors some of whom are Kalabari people. The main  Trans-Kalabari Road is one project that is dear to the people and residents of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas of Rivers State. This is because through the road commuters can easily access several communities in the three local government areas. For instance, the road when completed will enable access to eight of the ten communities in Degema Local Government Area,  namely: Bukuma, Tombia,  Bakana, Oguruama, Obuama, Usokun, Degema town  and the Degema Consulate. It will also link 15 of the 16 communities in Asari Toru Local Government Area. The communities are: Buguma, the local government headquarters, Ido, Abalama, Tema, Sama, Okpo, Ilelema, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama, Krakrama, Omekwe-Ama, Angulama. The road will also connect  14  of 17 wards in Akuku Toru Local Government Area, and other settlements. It is interesting to note that It is faster,  and far more convenient and economical for the catchment Communities on the Trans-Kalabari Road network to go to the State Capital than the East West Road.  The people of the three local government areas will prefer  to work or do their transactions in Port Harcourt from their respective communities to staying in Port Harcourt where the house rent and the general cost of living is astronomically high.
 Consequently, development will seamlessly spread to the 28 out of 34 communities of Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas. The only Communities that are not linked by the road project are Oporoama in Asari Toru,  the Ke and  Bille Communities in Degema Local Government Area and the “Oceania” communities of Abissa, Kula, Soku, Idama, Elem Sangama of Akuku Toru Local Government Area. But because of the economic value of the unlinked Communities to Nigeria, (they produce substantial oil and gas in the area), the Federal, State Governments and the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), can extend the road network to those areas just as Bonny is linked to Port Harcourt and the Lagos Mainland Bridge is connecting several towns in Lagos and neighbouring States.Kudos to previous administrations who  had constructed the Central Group axis.
 However, what is said to be the First Phase of the Trans-Kalabari Road project is actually a linkage of the “Central Group” Communities which consists of Krakrama, Angulama, Omekwe. Ama, Omekwe Tari Ama, Ifoko, Tema, Sangama. It is the peripheral of the Trans-Kalabari Road. The completion of the  Main Trans Kalabari project will free Port Harcourt and Obio/Akpor areas from congestion. It will motivate residents and people of the three local areas to contribute to the development of their Communities. If the Ogonis, Etches, Emohuas, Oyigbos, Okrikas, Elemes can feel comfortable doing business in Port Harcourt from home, residents and people whose communities are linked to Port Harcourt through the Trans-Kalabari Road will no doubt, do likewise. The vast arable virgin land of the Bukuma people can be open for development and sustainable agricultural ventures by Local, State and Federal Government.
It is necessary to recall that the Bukuma community was host to the Federal Government’s Graduate Farmers’ Scheme and the Rivers State Government moribund School-to-Land Scheme under Governor Fidelis Oyakhilome. Bukuma was the only community in Degema, Asari Toru and Akuku Toru Local Government Areas that has the capacity to carry those agricultural programmes. However the lack of road to transport farm produce to Port Harcourt and facilitate the movement of the beneficiaries of the scheme who lived in the community which is several miles away from the farms, hampered the sustainability of the programme. The main Trans-Kalabari Road remains the best gift to the people of Degema, Asari Toru, and Akuku-Toru Local Government Areas. Kudos to Sir Siminilayi Fubara.
By: Igbiki Benibo
Continue Reading

Opinion

That  U.S. Capture of Maduro

Published

on

Quote:”Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction.”
The first part of this story was published in our last edition.
 
In Africa and the Middle East, regime change—whether by invasion, proxy warfare, or sanctions—has often left behind fractured states, weakened institutions, and prolonged instability. Washington’s motivations in Venezuela are widely understood: vast oil reserves, alliances with U.S. rivals, and symbolic defiance of American influence in the Western Hemisphere. But none of these reasons confer legal or moral legitimacy. Strategic convenience does not nullify sovereignty. Political frustration does not authorise military abduction. If every powerful nation acted on its grievances in this manner, global chaos would inevitably follow. International law provides mechanisms for accountability. Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), individuals accused of crimes against humanity or other grave offences are subject to investigation and prosecution through judicial processes.
Likewise, extradition treaties, mutual legal assistance agreements, and Interpol mechanisms exist to ensure accountability while respecting due process. These frameworks were designed precisely to prevent unilateral enforcement of “justice” by military force. The most profound consequence of America’s action may not be in Caracas, but in the precedent it sets. If the world accepts that a superpower can unilaterally depose another country’s president, then the foundation of the international system is weakened. Sovereignty becomes conditional—no longer a right, but a privilege tolerated at the discretion of the powerful. Going forward, if another country invades its neighbour, will the United States retain the moral authority to impose sanctions or demand restraint? Some analysts already warn that parallels between Russia’s actions in Ukraine and America’s conduct in Venezuela risk further eroding global norms. Selective adherence to international law breeds cynicism and accelerates the drift toward a world governed by force rather than rules.
Power—military, economic, or political—should serve human progress and collective well-being, not domination and destruction. For African nations, many of which emerged from colonial rule through bitter struggle, this precedent is especially alarming. Sovereignty is not an abstract legal concept; it is a hard-won shield against external domination. Any erosion of that principle anywhere weakens it everywhere. Africa’s painful history of foreign interference makes this lesson especially urgent.  For me, the real issue is not whether Nicolás Maduro is a good or bad leader. That judgment belongs, first and foremost, to the Venezuelan people. The larger issue is whether the international system still operates on law—or has quietly reverted to hierarchy. If America insists it is defending global order, it must ask itself a difficult question: can an order survive when its most powerful guardian feels entitled to violate it? Until that question is answered honestly, the capture of a foreign president will remain not a triumph of justice, but a troubling symbol of a world drifting from law toward force.
If the United States felt so strongly about the allegations of terrorism, drug trafficking  against Maduro, were there no other lawful options? Judicial accountability, diplomacy, regional mediation, and multilateral pressure may be slow and imperfect, but they reflect respect for international law and sovereign equality. Military seizure is a blunt instrument. It humiliates institutions, radicalizes populations, and hardens resistance. It may remove a leader, but it rarely resolves the underlying crisis. History teaches that military interventions seldom result in stable democratic outcomes. More often, they breed resentment, resistance, and long-term instability. For the sake of global order and the rule of law, the United States should reconsider this path and recommit to diplomacy, legal cooperation, and respect for the sovereign equality of states. Former U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly described the invasion of Venezuela as “unlawful and unwise,” warning that such actions “do not make America safer, stronger, or more affordable.” Her words reflect a growing recognition, even within the United States, that force without legitimacy undermines both moral authority and global stability.
Should what happened in Venezuela serve as a wake-up call for corrupt African leaders who undermine the people’s right to choose their leaders? The answer is yes. The capture of Maduro should alarm African leaders who manipulate elections, weaken institutions, suppress opposition, undermine citizens’ rights, or cling to power at all costs. Venezuela faced widespread criticism over disputed elections and repression long before this episode, and that context shaped how the world reacted. This does not justify foreign military intervention, but it highlights an uncomfortable truth: prolonged democratic decay isolates nations and invites external pressure—from sanctions to diplomatic censure. Global opinion matters, and legitimacy at home strengthens sovereignty abroad. The Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and several African leaders have rightly condemned the events in Venezuela, invoking the principles of sovereignty and non-interference enshrined in international and regional law.
Beyond condemnation, however, African leaders must look inward. The continent’s future cannot be built on repression, constitutional manipulation, and personal greed. Leadership must reflect the will of the people, not desperation for power. Two days ago, a social commentator on a radio station argued that Trump’s action—though condemnable—demonstrates how far a leader can go for his country’s interest. According to this view, he did not intervene in Venezuela for personal enrichment, but to strengthen his nation. In stark contrast, many African leaders plunder their own countries. They siphon public resources, impose crushing taxes and harmful policies, and leave their citizens poorer—all for selfish gain. That contradiction is the deeper lesson Africa must confront.True sovereignty is protected not only by international law, but by accountable leadership at home.
 By:  Calista Ezeaku
Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

on

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Trending