The Senate, yesterday, rejected the report by the Committee on Finance in which the N143.7billion budget of the Federal Inland Revenue Service was approved.
The lawmakers, while debating the recommendation of the committee during the day’s plenary, criticised the report as lacking details.
While some senators who spoke on the report said it was fraught with ambiguities, others cited duplication of projects in the proposed budget.
The President of the Senate, Bukola Saraki, who presided over the plenary, asked the committee to work on the grey areas in its report and re-present it in one week.
On the proposed 2016 budget of the FIRS, the report said, “The Federal Inland Revenue Service projected to collect tax revenues to the tune of N4.082trillion in 2016.
“This comprises of N484billion oil and N3.597trillion non-oil revenues. The projected four per cent Cost of Collection on non-oil revenue is N143,904,640,000.
“The total projected available fund for the 2016 budget is N146,165,108,293, comprising of four per cent Cost of Collection and N2,260,468,293 or 20 per cent of 2015 operating surplus.”
The Chairman, Senate Committee on Finance, Senator John Enoh, while presenting the report to the chamber, recalled that the Senate on July 21, 2016, considered the request of President Muhammadu Buhari on the 2016 budget of the FIRS and referred same to the committee for further legislative action.
On the performance of the 2015 budget of the FIRS, the report said National Assembly’s joint Committees on Finance approved a revenue projection of N436trillion, comprising of N1.74trillion oil revenue and N262trillion non-oil revenue.
The joint committee also projected the four per cent Cost of Collection of non-oil revenue by the FIRS to be N104,723,880,000.
The committee stated the summary of the proposed 2016 expenditure of the service as follows: personnel, N64,491,130,526; overhead, N46,363,000,000; and capital, N32,868,300,000, bringing the total expenditure to N143,722,430,526.
The committee, according to the report, observed that the projected non-oil revenue collection had increased from the 2015 collection, thereby increasing the four per cent Cost of Collection to the service to N143,904,640,000bn from N104,723,880,000 in 2015.
The committee further observed that, “The total personnel costs are for salaries, wages, allowances, performance bonuses and social contributions. The 8,000 (members of) staff are proposed to be on the payroll during the 2016 financial year, which accounts for the increase of 19 per cent above actual staff strength of 6,748.
The projection presumes a recruitment of new staff in 2016.
It further observed that, “The overhead cost is very vital in driving the achievement of FIRS’ core objectives of tax revenue generation.
“The provisions in 2016 budget give more emphasis on availability of office materials, training, consulting and professional services and publicity.”
The committee added that, “The capital cost estimates proposed includes ongoing projects, which are to be completed during the 2016 financial year, as well as new projects to be carried out.
“These projects include new corporate headquarters and other prototype offices, construction of new offices nationwide and ICT projects.”
The committee, therefore, recommended that a total expenditure of N143,722,430,526 be approved for the FIRS in 2016, which the Senate rejected.
Meanwhile, the shadow of the past that prevented Nigeria from investing in the Sovereign Wealth Fund during the good days of Nigerian crude sale has again resurfaced as the Senate, yesterday, suspended the consideration of the Nigeria Sovereign Investment Authority (Establishment) Act 2011 (Amendment) Bill, following protests by some senators who insisted that further legislative action on the bill would be prejudicial since state governors are already contesting in court, the legality of deducting funds from the federation account by the Federal Government through the agency.
Chairman of the Senate Committee on Finance, Senator John Eno, at plenary presented the report of the bill seeking to amend the Nigerian Sovereign Investment Authority (NSIA), for debate but just before commencement of debate, the Senate Minority Leader, Godswill Akpabio, described any legislation on the bill as illegal, as he pointed out that there is need to await the judgment of the court on the matter.
Akpabio admitted, however, that it is proper for Nigeria to save for the rainy day, but insisted that there is need to strengthen the relevant laws relating to the agency to forestall possible abuse in the management of the agency.
According both him, the major reason why the governors had opposed the policy during the time of former President Goodluck Jonathan was because they wanted the major stakeholders to be involved in the regulation and administration of the agency.
According to him, since the funds will have a commencing seed of one billion dollars, to be deducted from the federation account, which constitutionally belong jointly to the local, states and federal governments, it is proper to have them well represented in the agency and its board.
Deputy Senate President, Senator Ike Ekweremadu, in his contribution noted that there is need to save for the scarce moments but emphasised that it is unconstitutional to consider and pass the report on the bill without first adjusting the Constitution to accommodate the controversial sections of the bill.
He, therefore, advice that the Senate to suspend the consideration of the bill until the Constitution Review Committee amends the Constitution in line with those sections that are unconstitutional in it.
President of the Senate, Senator Saraki, trying to save the bill and to ensure its passage, however advocated that only sections (10) of the bill be stepped down since it is the only section that is not in line with the Constitution.
He said the Senate Committee on Constitution Review, headed by the Deputy Senate President, can address the constitutional issues raised by some lawmakers while reviewing the constitution, before the bill will be passed eventually into law.
According to Saraki, since there is a unanimous agreement among the lawmakers that Nigeria should save for the future, the Senate should go ahead to consider the report.
However, mid into the consideration of the report, the controversial section 10 came up again, seeking to allocate $1billion from the federation account to the NSIA, and became a road block for the debate as it would only be prejudicial to debate on an issue in court already.
At that point, the debate was suspended and the bill withdrawn.
It would be recalled that the Nigeria Sovereign Investment Authority (Establishment) Act 2011 (Amendment) Bill, seeking to save ( Sovereign Wealth Fund) for the rainy day during the hay days of oil price through cuts from the federation account (local , states and federal governments) but was vehemently opposed by state governors, especially governors of the opposition party.

Nneka Amaechi-Nnadi, Abuja