Editorial

Reversing Nigeria’s Eroding Human Rights

Published

2 years ago

December 15, 2023

On Sunday, December 10, a global commemoration marked the 75th anniversary of the seminal Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). This Declaration, formally adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in Paris three years after the establishment of this universal body, stands as a monument to the promotion and preservation of human rights worldwide.
The UDHR came into existence, contextualised by the chilling aftermath of the Second World War, imbued with a vision to protect human dignity and prevent such atrocities from recurring. The 30 articles enshrining diverse aspects of social, political, economic, and cultural rights constitute the bedrock of human rights jurisprudence and logic.
Against the backdrop of the recently celebrated International Human Rights Day, the world finds itself at a crossroads. We celebrate a global mandate advocating for the respect of fundamental human rights whilst simultaneously confronting the grim reality of rights contravention in several parts of the world.
Particularly, the scrutiny intensifies for Nigeria, where reports of rights violations by both state and non-state actors have dramatically spiked. Despite 24 consecutive years of civil rule, the basic rights of millions of Nigerians remain shockingly elusive.
To better grasp the scale and alarming trend of these issues, it is essential to take a closer look at the everyday realities of Nigerian citizens. Amnesty International stated in their 2019/20 report that the Nigerian government had been found wanting in the respect for the rights to freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association. Malevolent actions of state authorities and various armed groups exhibit a gross disregard for the sanctity of human life – the most basic human right.
The Nigerian government’s stance towards human rights advocacy can, at best, be described as passive – a term infernally far from the active participation required to actualise change. As argued by some human rights scholars, a government’s duty is not just to avoid violating human rights, but to actively protect and champion them, a role grossly neglected by the Nigerian government. Meanwhile, non-state actors like Boko Haram, Islamic State in West Africa Province (ISWAP), and other armed groups commit acts of violence with disturbing audacity, revealing their blatant disregard for human rights.
However, simply stating the problem or resorting to politically-charged rhetoric does not facilitate practical change. It is instrumental to understand that respect for human rights is fundamentally imperative for a state’s stability and prosperity; it is not just an abstract moral cause. The protection of individual human rights is inextricably linked with national development. It becomes unmistakably evident that nations that uphold human rights tend to be more politically stable, economically prosperous, and display a more significant degree of societal harmony.
Since its independence in 1960, Nigeria has continuously experienced tension, instability, and conflict, invariably leading to multifaceted human rights abuses. These violations, which include the killing of civilians by military airstrikes, rights infringements by the police, and assaults on persons and property by criminals, underscore the pervading dissonance.
In October 2020, the world watched in real-time as peaceful #EndSARS protesters met with live ammunition, further corroborating reports of widespread rights abuses by Nigerian security forces. The assault on persons and property by criminals represents another facet of concern.
Nigeria has a high prevalence of violent crime, from kidnapping to armed robbery, and has grappled with an escalating insurgency for over a decade. The failings of security agencies to curb these crimes reflect a tacit denial of the basic right to security for the Nigerian citizen.
In recent years, there has been an alarming upsurge in extrajudicial practices and killings within the Nigeria Police Force.
According to a report by the Open Society Initiative, these measures have included tactics as severe as illicit killings, sexual assault, and extortion. Notably, these incidents have transpired within over 400 police stations throughout the country. It uncovers the insidious paradox of an institution, charged with the responsibility of preserving civil liberties, being found guilty of breaching them.
While governments are traditionally perceived as the defenders of rights and enforcers of laws, a disconcerting development reveals a different narrative. The instances of frequent disobedience of court orders, unlawful detention, demolition of property without due process, denial of fundamental access to education, and brazen abuse of religious rights present a glaring paradox.
Having examined assorted human rights abuses, it is innocuous to say that citizens’ enjoyment of basic rights in Nigeria is far from ideal. Nigeria’s current position, as ranked by the World Report 2020, confirms that the country’s human rights problem is alarming. Regrettably, Human Rights Watch places the nation at 128th position out of 162 countries.
Reversing this trend will necessitate a profound and robust citizens’ commitment, requiring them to use every democratic tool at their disposal to challenge these flagrant violations and hold their governments accountable. Without this capitulation to those principles on which democracies stand, it can be perilously easy for the state itself to become the predator on the rights it is meant to protect.
The protection of human rights should not be perceived as a luxury but a necessity. Like a seed, once sown and nurtured, it yields benefits for society at large. The Nigerian state apparatus, civil society and international community must pull together in stemming this tide of abhorrent human rights violations. The chronicles of human rights infringements in our country are distressingly long and seemingly entrenched, but it is never too late for a reversal. While the intervention required is comprehensive, the responsibility is collective.
World Human Rights Day must be more than an annual ritual of reflection— it must serve as a wake-up call to the ever-pertinent cries for justice, respect and proper observance of human rights. The Nigerian example serves as a stark reminder to the world about where inadvertence can lead societies. It is nevertheless a clarion call that the respect of human rights should be a universally adopted, diligently pursued cause, without which the peace and prosperity we so aspire become a far and duplicitous dream.
This is why we align with the theme of this year’s Human Rights Day: “Freedom, Equality and Justice for All”. Sadly, this theme remains yet an unfulfilled declaration in Nigeria’s context. Human rights, rather than being upheld, appear under assault, giving a morose picture of the reality amidst a globally acclaimed commitment to fundamental rights. It is high time the Nigerian government and the international community undertook urgent steps to redress these infractions and ensure just conditions for all citizens. This is the only way to reverse Nigeria’s eroding human rights record.

Editorial

HYPREP And The Collapsed Water Tank

Published

2 weeks ago

November 24, 2025

The Tide

The recent collapse of a water tank built by the Hydrocarbon Pollution Remediation Project (HYPREP) in the Gwara area of Ogoni in Rivers State is an alarming reminder of how easily public faith in government interventions can erode when development projects fail so soon after their unveiling. The incident has stirred deep concern across the state, raising doubts about whether the communities can truly rely on the structures meant to improve their lives.

Only days earlier, the Minister of Environment, Balarabe Lawal, had proudly inaugurated two water projects in Bane and Gwara communities in the Khana Local Government Area, with residents celebrating what they believed would mark a new chapter in access to clean and safe drinking water. The communities had hoped these projects would bring long-awaited relief and stand as symbols of meaningful government presence.

Yet in an unexpectedly disturbing turn of events, the Gwara water station, designed to supply potable water to about 14 communities, collapsed merely three days after the commissioning. This rapid failure has left residents not only shocked but also frustrated, as such an outcome suggests deep flaws in planning, execution, supervision, or all three combined.

Some natives allege that the debacle resulted from the use of inferior construction materials, raising a serious accusation that calls into question the level of professionalism involved. If such claims turn out to be true, then the collapse becomes more than an accident; it becomes evidence of negligence that could have endangered several lives.

Others are alleging outright sabotage, a troubling claim that suggests there may be forces actively working against the progress of development projects in the area. This possibility only widens the scope of questions that investigators must answer to restore public confidence.

Meanwhile, HYPREP insists that its water projects in other Ogoni communities are functioning efficiently and that this particular incident does not define the overall quality of its work. However, this defence, while necessary, does little to calm a community that has already seen too many failed promises over the years.

This situation raises an important question about whether the good work of HYPREP is being undermined by unscrupulous individuals whose interests may not align with the welfare of the people. If sabotage is indeed at play, then identifying those responsible becomes crucial in preventing further setbacks.

Given the gravity of the matter, the collapse requires an immediate and rigorous investigation to uncover what truly happened and why. It is reassuring that a committee has already been set up to delve into the details, but the public expects nothing short of a transparent and thorough process.

The fact remains that if the tank had collapsed on people, the community would be counting casualties and dealing with a deeply grievous tragedy. The near-miss should serve as a wake-up call about the potential dangers that poorly executed infrastructure projects pose in vulnerable areas.

It is therefore expected that the findings of the committee will expose the actual competence or otherwise of the contractors HYPREP engages. Only a reliable and professional team can successfully deliver the kind of durable infrastructure that the Ogoni people deserve.

If such a catastrophe can occur just days after commissioning, it indicates that similar incidents may happen again in the future unless deliberate and strategic efforts are made to prevent them. Preventive measures must become a standard part of project planning and monitoring.

The public cannot help but question why an organisation as financially endowed as HYPREP appears unable to deliver a credible water project for the Gwara community. With the massive resources at its disposal, the people expect excellence, not excuses.

Ogoni, being a historically volatile area whose people have endured relentless injustice and environmental degradation, cannot afford provocations of this nature. A crisis could easily have been triggered if the collapse had caused casualties or severe destruction.

More regrettably, the Ogoni clean-up has evolved into a lucrative cash cow for corrupt officials who seem more interested in contracts and kickbacks than in the wellbeing of the people. Meanwhile, residents continue to drink polluted water, suffer from inadequate healthcare, and navigate treacherous road networks.

Communities across Ogoniland must refuse to remain silent when substandard projects are imposed on them. Their voices and vigilance are vital in demanding accountability and ensuring that development interventions truly meet their needs.

HYPREP, on its part, must reaffirm an unwavering commitment to quality, transparency, and accountability in all ongoing and future water projects across Ogoni. Only through this can it rebuild trust and demonstrate that it genuinely prioritises the people.

Finally, HYPREP must enforce rigorous internal and external quality assurance mechanisms that leave no room for negligence. Restoration work should commence urgently, with all efforts dedicated to ensuring that project delivery meets global standards and restore hope to the long-suffering communities of Ogoniland.

Editorial

Resurgence Of Illegal Structures In PH

Published

2 weeks ago

November 19, 2025

The Tide

The resurgence of illegal structures in Port Harcourt has become a thing of deep concern for residents who remember what the city once looked like and what it has now become. From street corners to backyard spaces, unapproved buildings and makeshift extensions are rising once again, disturbing the orderliness that once defined the capital of Rivers State. The return of this ugly trend signals a worrying decline in urban discipline.

Illegal structures were decisively prohibited during the administration of Rt. Hon. Chibuike Rotimi Amaechi, who enforced the ban in 2008. His government recognised that Port Harcourt was slipping into chaos, and firm action was taken to restore the integrity of the city’s physical environment. What followed was a sweeping clampdown on structures that violated the city’s masterplan.

The enforcement was so severe and so uncompromising that many residents of the Garden City took it upon themselves to demolish their own illegal structures in order to avoid heavier sanctions. It was a defining moment in the city’s recent history, because it demonstrated that with political will and consistent implementation, urban order could be restored.

The demolition exercise brought back the beauty of Port Harcourt. The city began to breathe again as congested spaces opened up and previously blocked access routes became free. There was a noticeable improvement in cleanliness and spatial organisation, and the renewed aesthetic appeal was appreciated by many who had longed for a well-planned urban landscape.

Many backyards became so spacious that they were not only neat but motorable. Before the enforced clean-up, these same spaces had been used for all kinds of menial activities. Some were turned into mechanic workshops, while others were cluttered with kiosks and shanties that distorted the environment. The transformation that followed the demolition was evidence of what strong governance can achieve.

When former Governor Nyesom Wike assumed office in 2015, he sustained the ban and continued the demolition of illegal structures. This ensured that the gains of the previous administration were not eroded. Residents saw a continuation of orderliness and appreciated the consistency in urban policy.

Sadly, today, illegal structures have returned in full force, defacing the state capital and reintroducing the very problems that had earlier been tackled. These structures now appear everywhere, giving Port Harcourt the look of a city sliding back to its infamous reputation as a Garbage City. This development is unacceptable and raises questions about the laxity of enforcement agencies.

We therefore urge the Ministry of Physical Planning and Urban Development to halt this dangerous trend by rigorously enforcing the ban on illegal structures across Port Harcourt. Without immediate action, the city risks losing the gains of years of disciplined planning.

Such structures must be identified and demolished without hesitation, and their owners prosecuted in accordance with the law. This is necessary to send a clear message that Port Harcourt cannot be returned to filth, especially in an era when cities around the world strive to modernise and maintain order.

Additionally, the Urban Development Ministry should intensify the monitoring and control of physical development in the city. Before any new site is approved, the Ministry must ensure that access roads, drainage systems, markets, and other social amenities are included in the layout. Proper planning must precede construction.

The Rivers State Government must take more than a passive interest in the development of virgin areas within the metropolis. It is discouraging that illegal structures continue to spring up even in locations where earlier demolitions had taken place. This shows a lack of consistent supervision.

A responsible government sustains good policies introduced by previous administrations rather than discarding them. The fight against illegal structures should not depend on who occupies the Brick House, but on the collective desire to preserve the city’s integrity.

One of the primary features of a modern city is its aesthetic value, complemented by good roads and effective sanitation. Illegal structures distort these values. They obstruct traffic, endanger pedestrians, and increase the likelihood of accidents. When order is compromised, everyone suffers.

There must also be policies to regulate the indiscriminate sale of properties in the state. Many illegal structures exist because land transactions are poorly monitored. Enlightenment campaigns will help residents understand the dangers and legal implications of contributing to urban disorder.

Finally, the authorities must rise to their responsibilities. The Ministry of Urban Development must take immediate action to restore sanity. Port Harcourt is the only real metropolitan centre that Rivers State can boast of, which means it must be carefully maintained. Its masterplan should not be tampered with, and the city must be preserved for future generations.

Editorial

Certificate Forgery, Loss Of Public Trust

Published

4 weeks ago

November 10, 2025

The Tide

Nigeria has found itself once more in an uncomfortable global spotlight after the abrupt resignation of Geoffrey Uche Nnaji, the former Minister of Innovation, Science, and Technology. The circumstances surrounding his exit were neither dignifying nor reassuring. Instead, they have brought about a profound sense of national embarrassment and institutional opprobrium.

The allegations that Nnaji forged his university degree and National Youth Service Corps certificate have raised serious questions about integrity in public office. The University of Nigeria, Nsukka, (UNN) expressly denied awarding him a degree, stating unequivocally that he did not complete his studies. Such a revelation is not only scandalous but deeply unsettling for a nation already battling credibility deficit.

Even more troubling is the fact that the former Minister, under intense scrutiny, reportedly conceded that he was never issued a certificate by the university. This revelation begs the most fundamental question. Where then did he secure the UNN decree certificate he allegedly tendered upon his appointment? That inquiry alone unravels layers of possible complicity and systematic failure.

This matter has opened a can of worms. It is a sad commentary on a nation struggling to project an image of responsibility and moral uprightness. Instead of inspiring confidence, such cases reinforce the perception that Nigeria suffers from chronic ethical erosion in leadership recruitment processes.

It is particularly depressing that individuals who commit crimes of this nature can simply resign and walk away unscathed, as if public office was a revolving door of impunity. A mere resignation does not absolve one of accountability. It is imperative that those who defraud the nation must be held to legal consequences, not treated as though they merely committed a social faux pas.

Unfortunately, this is not the first time Nigeria is grappling with such an ignoble scandal. A former Speaker of the House of Representatives, Salisu Buhari, was once enmeshed in a forgery controversy over a fake degree and age falsification. Former Finance Minister Kemi Adeosun resigned after being found with a forged NYSC exemption certificate. Such shameful precedents have become almost predictable.

When high-profile officials indulge in such fraudulent practices and face little to no consequence, it sends a dangerous message. It tells ordinary citizens that integrity is negotiable and that laws are flexible privileges reserved for the powerful.

It is unconscionable that the law eagerly pursues the poor for petty infractions while turning a blind eye when the wealthy and politically connected commit more grievous offences. This selective justice is a tragic indictment of our system and values as a nation.

Our leaders, by virtue of the trust placed in them, should be punished doubly when they violate the law. The law must not merely exist on paper. If leaders continue to evade accountability, then what exists is not a legal system but a symbolic facade.

Time has come for the authorities to demonstrate that all Nigerians are indeed equal before the law. That principle, which is the bedrock of every functioning democratic society, must be evident not only in rhetoric but in action.

While it is commendable that Nnaji resigned, resignation alone cannot suffice as closure. We insist that he be properly investigated and prosecuted where found culpable. Likewise, previous offenders should also be recalled to face justice. National healing requires consequences, not concealment.

This scandal exposes the rottenness of our political selection process. It signals that trust has been replaced with convenience and accountability substituted with nonchalance. Nigeria cannot move forward if leadership continues to be riddled with fraudulent representation.

The Department of State Services (DSS) must be held accountable for clearing an appointee whose records were allegedly not thoroughly verified. Screening is not a ceremonial exercise. It is supposed to involve critical background checks and authentication of claims.

Similarly, the National Assembly must put an end to the hollow practice of asking nominees to “take a bow and go.” Ministerial screenings are not social receptions. They are constitutionally mandated checks intended to protect national interest. When legislators fail in this role, the entire country suffers the consequences.

Both the DSS and the National Assembly must reform their processes immediately. The continued casual, wishy-washy scrutiny of appointees is not only an indictment of leadership but a disservice to Nigerians. If Nigeria must rebuild trust and respect, it begins with ensuring that only individuals of proven integrity occupy public office. Accountability must prevail, and the era of impunity must be brought to an end.