Opinion

I Need Endorsements, Please

Published

3 years ago

November 8, 2022

The lingering row between two prominent Yoruba elder statesmen over the endorsement of candidates for the forthcoming Presidential election in the country and the leadership of Pan-Yoruba Socio-Political organisation, Afenifere, has raised some questions in the minds of some concerned Nigerians. Weeks after the acting leader of Afenifere, Ayo Adebanjo and the leadership of the group endorsed the presidential candidate of the Labour Party, Peter Obi, a move which he said was based on the principle of equity, justice, peace and inclusiveness, Pa Reuben Fasoranti, who had resigned as the President of the group, endorsed the All Progressives Congress, APC standard bearer, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu. Since then, there have been accusations and counter accusations, some denials of published statements, tantrums from supporters of both notable leaders and all that.
A particular group that has thrown its weight behind Fasoranti’s endorsement of Tinubu is the Ogun State chapter of the National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS). Their reason is simple, “This is not the time for Yoruba to be divided. Election is around the corner and as a leading region in the country, we must unite and all work for the success of our own in the election.”
“We are not tribalistic, neither are we whipping up ethnic sentiment, but for equity and justice’s sake, we firmly believe that this is the turn of the Yorubas.
“We must not allow our sentiment against Tinubu to prevent us from reclaiming power. We, therefore, appeal to the foremost Yoruba leader, Pa Adebanjo, to set aside his grudge or hatred and embrace the APC candidate for the sake of peace, unity and progress of Yorubaland.”
Across the country, the story is the same. As the general election draws near, events have started unfolding. The political atmosphere is becoming more tense. There is a lot of political alignment – defection from one political party to another, politicians desperately looking for the endorsement from one individual, group or another.
Curiously enough, one thing is that when one group kicks off the endorsement propaganda, every other group in the State, constituency or nation as the case may be, will be falling over themselves to register their loyalty and support to the aspirants. Some of the endorsers, we heard, are paid and cajoled into taking the action. All kinds of encomiums are poured on the persons vying for the seats even when these praise-singers do not believe in them.
The other day a story made the rounds about the Traditional rulers from Enugu North Senatorial District of Enugu State, endorsing the current governor of the state, Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi for Senate, presenting him with “Ofo” – the Igbo traditional symbol of truth and justice, a move that had since been described by some people as abominable. They believe that no Nigerian politician is worthy of holding the “ofo” since they do not work to behold truth and justice.
A similar scenario played out in the recent past when some past governors literally turned government houses across the nation to political rally grounds as mobilised people from all walks of life trooped to the government houses to “beg” the governors to re-contest. We have not forgotten the one million-man-march organised by Daniel Kanu and co, clamouring for the transmutation of Late Gen. Sani Abacha to a civilian president. Traditional rulers and tribal leaders mobilised their followers for Abacha. Religious title holders prophesied that he was God-ordained.
The question then is, what is the big deal about endorsement? Is endorsement an assurance for victory in an election? Is it enough to sway voters? What should be the criteria for endorsing a candidate for a political office? A political endorsement according to Wikipedia is a public declaration of one’s personal or group’s support for a candidate for elected office. It is a potent tool to persuade many people to vote for a political candidate. You endorse a candidate because you think he is the best person to hold that particular political office. You have gone through his manifesto, thought through about the personality of the candidate, what he stands for, his values and policies. Does he/she have the capacity, in all ramifications, to occupy the position he is seeking for?
Do the legion of endorsers in this political dispensation factor all these in taking their decisions or are they driven by what they stand to gain personally or because the candidate is of the same faith, political party or tribe with them as the young NANS members said? Let truth be told, how many of these politicians clamouring for endorsement deserve it? What have they done for their people to make the people willingly recommend them for either a second term or higher position?
Many of them during the last electioneering campaigns promised the people heaven and earth if elected only to dump all the promises and pursue their selfish interest as soon as they assumed office. Some of them have held public offices in the past and there are records of their greedy, selfish and corrupt practices while occupying those positions. There is growing hunger in the land, the rate of unemployment soars by the day, our communities lack basic amenities –no water, no road, no electricity. The states and nation face serious insecurity challenges with the crime rate on the increase, our currency depreciates rapidly everyday yet all our leaders talk about is the 2023 elections.
Not a few people have asked how our governors, lawmakers and even the President have time to govern when they use their first two years in office to settle down and the remaining two years to seek re-election or election into higher positions? One therefore thinks that our leaders should concentrate on good governance. They should make life better for the people instead of wasting public funds on lobbying and sponsoring groups to organise endorsement.
Likewise, all the people seeking to take over from the incumbent political office holders come 2023. Their major preoccupation now should be selling themselves to the people, coming up with practicable plans on how they will pick up Nigeria from the depth it has fallen. Let them publicise how they intend to make our refineries come back to life so that the senseless practice of exporting our crude oil and importing refined products will stop.
The candidates, particularly the presidential candidates should show Nigerians their convincing plans of dealing with crude oil theft, fuel subsidy, insecurity, corruption and other challenges facing the country. A golden fish has no hiding place, they say. So, a leader who merits endorsement or re-election does not need to sponsor people to champion that cause. His good works, his reputation, his impeccable track record will definitely speak for him. And for the traditional/ religious/political and other leaders, groups and organisations in the country, who usually see electioneering periods as a period of “harvest” and would go on endorsement spree irrespective of whether the candidates merit the endorsement or not, is it not time they began to place the good of the nation and the generality of the citizens above their selfish gains?
Nigeria continues to sink deeper into a somewhat bottomless pit by the day and if we the citizens fail to set religious, political, tribal and other selfish sentiments aside; if we fail to put the moneybag, sweet-tongued, selfish, corrupt politicians in their place and take back our country next year, then we should not have any reason to complain or yell when they chastise us.
If truly we Nigerians are tired of decades of poor governance in the country, our consideration for who we should choose to take up mantles of leadership at various levels of governance next years should go beyond which candidate has the highest endorsement, who was endorsed by who, who has the most worded manifesto. We must ask ourselves who among the candidates is ready to walk the talk. It is also important to state that if nothing is done about the wave of endorsement which is turning our politics to that of hatred, anger and animosity, peace, unity and love that we clamour for will be far-fetched and our democracy will be worse off for it.

By: Calista Ezeaku

Opinion

Agony In Ivory Tower

Published

3 days ago

March 9, 2026

The Tide

Quote: A university that tolerates missing scripts, result manipulation and ‘sorting’ is not merely failing students—it is quietly destroying the moral foundation of education itself.”

The sad cases of missing scripts, compulsory Sorting, inputting of wrong results and other obnoxious practices in some public universities, leave much to be desired. One cannot imagine how a student will be compelled to suffer consequences of the flagrant negligence of a Head of Department, a lecturer, Department staff or an ICT staff.Many academic and non academic staff in several public universities seem to be performing far below standard, thus unproductive to the university system. The unacceptable cases of sorting, missing scripts, missing results, inputting of wrong grades to students, should not be mentioned in a university, not even in any academic community. This is because people who are employed to work in various positions should have cognate work experience and unquestionable competence. They should not be seen as certificate welding illiterates but people who have been proven to be worthy in learning and character, diligent and competent to carry out assigned responsibilities with minimal or no supervision.

The university as a citadel of learning should boast of men of integrity, people who are repositories of applied knowledge and competence to drive the much desired holistic development in a nation that functions on quality teaching and learning. A situation where a student having gone through the crucibles of learning and written a prescribed semester examination or class-based evaluation test, is told that his or her script is missing or that he or she did not participate in that academic exercise, or must sort to pass, is an unpardonable error and a height of callousness. In fact some lecturers and staff of Departments are using the seeming systemic defect (which is their architecture) as an opportunity to extort students. Sometimes it is discovered much to students chagrin that the supposed missing script was later discovered when a ransom was paid.

Since a lecturer, or Head of Department has in their disposal both Yam and the knife and determines who takes what (if they wish to give without strings), students have no alternative but to submit to their importunate demands in order to graduate at record time.Such practices should be unheard of in an institution that should be a vanguard of moral and ethical values and conduct. What people learn in school constitute their behavioural patterns in the society. Where the school as an agency of socialisation cannot drive positive change first in its immediate environment, then the objective of education as a bedrock for the development of society, is inevitably compromised and counter-productive. The German Reformer, Dr. Martins Luther was quoted as saying, “I advise parents not to put their wards or children in any school where the Bible is not being used as a rule of life because such institutions will unnecessarily be corrupt”.

Gleaning from Luther’s sentiment one can deduce that the lack of respect and regard for values as well as the absence of the fear of God is the greatest undoing of most public schools. Another major challenge is that lack of Information, Communication and Technology literacy or compliance on the part of some lecturers and heads of department, may have informed the decision to give students’ scripts to secretaries to compile and input students results thereby making the secretaries the determinants of students’ fate. It is not saying a new thing that some of the secretaries in the process of compiling results have inputted wrong results, omitted names or down graded some students or given unmerited grades to others.Society today is ICT-driven and ICT-literacy enhances efficiency, speed and a reasonable degree of accuracy if the person behind the computer is level headed, articulate, competent, alive to responsibilities and is aware that negligence on his or her part is not only tantamount to a disservice to the university but to the students who may not graduate at record time because of his or her (computer operator’s) gross ineptitude or carelessness.

The ICT era makes the carrying of hard copy of results obsolete as lecturers through the Heads of Department can log on to the central server of the Exams and Records (if any) or ICT unit and input students’ results directly. By so doing the incessant cases where result on spread sheet is different from the one published online, more often than not, caused by abject negligence, will be avoided. The process will also end the intermediary services of some staff in the universities’ Information, Communication and Technology Department which has become a money spinner-a lucrative source of income to many of them. In fact some ICT staff reserved the power to award grades to students depending on students’ degree of compliance to terms and conditions. They can dubiously make or unmake a student. The university community should be considered too lofty to have careless, negligent, immoral and academic or professionally deficient people as academic or non-academic staff.

The Governing Councils and Senates of universities should be proactive in addressing the menace of missing Script, inputting of wrong results and sorting. This is necessary to end the slogan “Education is scam” so the system can produce quality students who are truly found worthy in learning and in character by operators who exemplify diligence, moral and ethical values. The much-needed reform must begin within the institutions themselves, because the future of any society is shaped in its classrooms.

By: Igbiki Benibo

Opinion

Strength of Emotional Equality

Published

3 days ago

March 9, 2026

The Tide

Quote: “Love thrives not when one gives more, but when both give fully — not in competition, not in performance, but in partnership.”

In every healthy relationship, there exists an invisible balance. It is not measured in grand gestures, expensive gifts, or public displays of affection. It is measured in something quieter and far more significant: emotional equality. When couples stand on equal emotional grounds, love becomes less of a negotiation and more of a partnership. Emotional equality does not mean both individuals express love in identical ways. It does not require matching personalities or mirroring temperaments. Rather, it speaks to balance — a shared willingness to invest, to communicate, to be vulnerable, and to grow. It is the difference between two people walking side by side and one person constantly trying to catch up.

In many relationships, imbalance begins subtly. One partner initiates most conversations. One apologizes more frequently. One carries the emotional labor — remembering important dates, managing conflicts, sensing tension, and attempting reconciliation. Over time, this uneven distribution of emotional effort breeds exhaustion. The partner who gives more begins to feel unseen. The one who gives less may grow comfortable in emotional passivity. Love, in such a space, starts to tilt — slowly at first, then significantly. Resentment can creep in quietly, disguising itself as patience. Silence may replace honest dialogue. What once felt effortless begins to feel heavy.

When couples stand on equal emotional grounds, responsibility is shared. Both people are accountable for the health of the relationship. If conflict arises, neither hides behind silence nor dominates through control. Instead, they engage. They listen. They speak honestly without weaponizing words. Equality creates safety — and safety strengthens intimacy. It allows both individuals to express needs without fear of ridicule or rejection. One of the most overlooked aspects of emotional equality is vulnerability. True connection requires courage. It demands that both partners risk being misunderstood. But when vulnerability is one-sided, it becomes exposure rather than intimacy. If one person consistently opens up while the other remains guarded, trust cannot fully deepen.

Equality ensures that emotional risks are mutual. Where one shares fears, the other shares too. Where one admits weakness, the other responds with openness rather than judgment. In such a space, authenticity flourishes. Another crucial element is validation. In emotionally balanced relationships, both partners feel heard. Their concerns are not dismissed as “overreactions.” Their feelings are not minimized or compared. When couples operate on equal emotional ground, they acknowledge each other’s experiences as legitimate. They may not always agree, but they always respect. Validation does not mean surrendering one’s viewpoint; it means recognizing that another’s emotional reality matters.

Equality also protects individuality. Contrary to popular belief, healthy love does not erase personal identity — it enhances it. When both partners are emotionally secure, they do not feel threatened by each other’s independence. Personal ambitions are encouraged, not resented. Friendships are respected, not restricted. Growth is celebrated, not feared. Standing on equal emotional grounds means neither person shrinks to accommodate the other. Instead, both expand, knowing the relationship is strong enough to hold their evolution. Power dynamics often expose emotional inequality. When one partner controls communication — appearing and disappearing unpredictably, withholding affection, or using silence as leverage — imbalance emerges.

Emotional dominance weakens intimacy. It creates anxiety instead of assurance. But when couples share emotional power, there is consistency. There is clarity. There is no need to decode affection because it is offered freely and intentionally. It is important to understand that equality does not imply perfection. Couples will still disagree. They will face stress, miscommunication, and moments of frustration. However, when emotional footing is equal, conflict does not threaten the foundation. Instead, it becomes an opportunity for understanding. Both partners approach challenges as teammates rather than opponents. They choose resolution over ego and repair over pride.

Time often reveals whether emotional equality truly exists. In the early stages of love, intensity can disguise imbalance. Enthusiasm feels mutual. Effort appears equal. But as routine settles in and novelty fades, the structure of the relationship becomes clearer. Who still initiates? Who still invests? Who still shows up consistently? Sustainable love requires sustained balance. It is built not merely on attraction, but on deliberate reciprocity. Standing on equal emotional grounds requires intentionality. It demands honest conversations about needs and expectations. It requires both partners to examine their habits — whether they withdraw during tension, avoid accountability, or rely on the other to carry the emotional weight. Emotional maturity is not about avoiding conflict; it is about handling it responsibly and returning, again and again, to shared ground.

Perhaps the greatest benefit of emotional equality is peace. There is no constant anxiety about where one stands. No guessing games about commitment. No fear that affection may suddenly disappear. Instead, there is stability. There is reassurance. There is mutual effort. In a world where relationships often blur the lines between attention and commitment, equality offers clarity. It reminds us that love should not feel like competition or performance. It should feel like partnership. When couples stand on equal emotional grounds, they build something resilient. They build trust that does not fracture easily. They build respect that does not depend on mood. They build a connection rooted not only in passion but in balance. And in that balance, love finds its strength — not in who gives more, but in how both give fully.

By: Sylvia ThankGod-Amadi

Opinion

NDDC: Time To Illuminate Homes

Published

2 weeks ago

March 2, 2026

The Tide

Quote:“Twenty-five years on, the Niger Delta cannot celebrate illuminated streets while families sit in darkness. Development must begin inside the home — where children study, businesses grow, and lives are built — before it glows on the roadside.”

The Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) was established in 2000 with a clear and urgent mandate: to facilitate the rapid, even, and sustainable development of Nigeria’s oil-producing Niger Delta region. The creation of the Commission followed decades of agitation over environmental degradation, infrastructural neglect, and socio-economic marginalization in the region. Its core mandate included the development of roads, bridges, electricity, water supply, health facilities, education, housing, environmental remediation, and economic empowerment initiatives. At inception, expectations were high that the Commission would transform the Niger Delta into a model of regional development. Over the years, the NDDC has indeed implemented numerous projects across the nine Niger Delta states. Roads have been constructed and rehabilitated in several communities, easing transportation challenges.

Schools have been renovated, and new classroom blocks have been provided in underserved areas. Health centres have been built or upgraded, improving access to primary healthcare services. The Commission has also awarded scholarships to students, including foreign postgraduate scholarships, empowering thousands of youths academically.Skills acquisition and youth empowerment programmes have helped many young people gain vocational competencies.Through various interventions, the NDDC has contributed to job creation and local economic stimulation.Solar-powered street lighting projects have been widely implemented in urban and semi-urban communities. These streetlights have improved visibility at night and contributed to enhanced security in some areas. Markets, highways, and public spaces illuminated by solar lights have experienced extended business hours.

For these efforts, the Commission deserves acknowledgment and commendation. However, development must always align with foundational mandates and pressing grassroots realities. A growing concern among residents is that while streets are illuminated, many homes remain in darkness. Rural electrification and household power access remain inconsistent and inadequate across large parts of the region. In riverine and remote communities, families still rely on generators, kerosene lamps, or complete darkness after sunset. The irony of brightly lit streets juxtaposed with powerless homes cannot be ignored. Electricity at the household level directly impacts education, health, and small-scale enterprise. Students cannot effectively study at night without reliable indoor lighting.Families cannot preserve food or power essential appliances without stable electricity.

Micro and small businesses struggle to grow without dependable energy access. While street lighting enhances public aesthetics and security, it does not substitute for domestic electrification. The proverb “charity begins at home” is especially relevant in this context. True community development must first empower households before beautifying public spaces. The Commission’s original mandate emphasizes integrated and sustainable development, not isolated infrastructural gestures. Balanced development requires that energy interventions prioritize homes alongside streets. Solar technology presents a unique opportunity for decentralized household electrification in off-grid communities. Extending solar solutions to individual homes would have a transformative social impact. Home-based solar systems could power lights, fans, small appliances, and communication devices.

Such interventions would reduce poverty, improve living standards, and stimulate grassroots productivity. By broadening its energy focus, the Commission would better reflect the spirit of its founding legislation. This is not a call to abandon street lighting projects, which have their merits. Rather, it is an appeal for balance, inclusivity, and alignment with core developmental objectives. Strategic planning should ensure that rural electrification and household access form a central pillar of ongoing interventions. Community engagement and needs assessments can help determine priority areas for household solar deployment. Twenty-five years after its establishment, the NDDC stands at a reflective moment in its institutional journey. The people of the Niger Delta say: thank you for the efforts so far—but not very much—because true appreciation will come when development begins at home and radiates outward, not merely when streets shine while houses remain in darkness.

By: King Onunwor