Editorial
SERAP’s Call For NASS Probe
About two weeks ago, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) issued a statement demanding an inquest into fresh allegations of missing N4.1 billion of public money budgeted for the National Assembly as documented in the 2016 audited report by the Office of the Auditor-General of the Federation.
While urging the Senate President, Ahmad Lawan, and Speaker of the House of Representatives, Femi Gbajabiamila, to act with dispatch in a letter dated May 15, 2021 and signed by its Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, SERAP noted that the fresh allegations were not part of earlier disclosure by the Auditor-General in other audited reports in which N4.4 billion of National Assembly money was said to be missing, misappropriated, diverted or stolen.
According to the Auditor-General Report for 2016, N4,144,706,602.68 of National Assembly money is missing, diverted or stolen. The National Assembly paid some contractors N417,312,538.79 without any documents. The Auditor-General wants the Clerk of the National Assembly to recover the amount in question from the contractors.
“The National Assembly reportedly spent N625,000,000.00 through its Constitution Review Committee between March and June, 2016, but without any document. The Auditor-General wants the Clerk to the National Assembly to recover the amount from the committee and furnish evidence of recovery for verification.
“The National Assembly also reportedly spent N66,713,355.08 as ‘personnel cost’ but ‘the payees in the cashbook did not correspond with those in the bank statement’. The Auditor-General wants ‘the irregular expenditure recovered from the officer who approved the payments”, SERAP noted among others.
While expressing concern about the negative impact of allegations of corruption on our economic development, social justice and public trust in public institutions, SERAP expressed the confidence that “the effective investigation of these fresh allegation and full recovery of any missing public funds would strengthen the country’s accountability framework, and show that the National Assembly can discharge its constitutional responsibility of amplifying the voices of Nigerians. It will also show that the body is acting in the best interest of the people”.
SERAP underlined the key role the National Assembly has to play in the fight against corruption in the country in line with its legislative and oversight functions, insisting that not much can be achieved by the legislative body in aid of the anti-graft war if the leadership and members do not first confront and overcome these allegations. Consequently, the public accountability body, strongly implored both chambers of the National Assembly “to identify the lawmakers and staff members suspected to be involved, and hand them over to appropriate anti-corruption agencies to face prosecution if there is sufficient admissible evidence, and to ensure full recovery of any missing public funds”.
The Tide strongly supports SERAP on its patriotic call to the National Assembly not to turn a blind eye to these allegations as it had done to several in the past. Though it had been convenient for the national legislative body to dismiss and discountenance many allegations of corruption among its ranks due to lack or insufficient evidence, these ones are well documented and come straight from no less an office than the Auditor-General of the Federation.
Of course, the National Assembly is not a stranger to controversies and allegations of corrupt practices. Up till now, Nigerians believe that the federal lawmakers’ earnings are shrouded in secrecy because they are questionable and underserving. Allegations of budget padding and sundry sharp practices in connivance with heads of Ministries, Departments and Agencies of government are common place. It is as well widely believed, and for good reason, that National Assembly members have a lot of contracts awarded to themselves by proxy. In fact, a serving minister of the Federal Republic is known to have pointedly accused the lawmakers of soliciting and sharing NDDC contracts to themselves on national television.
However, little or nothing is usually heard or done beyond the initial standard response of promise of investigation into such revelations to douse public outcry. The result is that, over the years, the people have lost trust and confidence in the National Assembly members as their true representatives and the institution as one they could look up to and rely upon to protect and further their interest.
But there is no democracy without the legislature and a credible legislature obtains its validity only from the people. This is why it is important for the National Assembly to always prioritise service to the people and assess its performance by the satisfaction they bring to the people. Surely, Nigerians would not be advocating a radical restructuring of the central legislative body with a feeling of despondence if they had experienced it as one that not only feels their pains but is committed to making their socio-economic circumstances more bearable.
This is why we agree with SERAP that “Addressing the allegations would improve public confidence and trust in the ability of the National Assembly to exercise its constitutional and oversight responsibilities, and to adhere to the highest standards of integrity”.
Indeed, a probe into these allegations may not be all that is needed to get the people’s trust, confidence and goodwill but it could be an indicator that all hope in the National Assembly as the people’s parliament is not lost after all. As the embodiment of the heart and soul that captures the essence, hopes and aspirations of the people, accountability, responsibility and responsiveness to the Nigerian people must begin with the National Assembly.
Beyond the probe of the missing billions, the leadership of the National Assembly should initiate measures to re-invent the nation’s prime legislative body with a view to making it truly wear the aura that is consistent with its description as the hallowed chamber. The sacredness of the institution must be of utmost concern to the leadership and therefore dirty deals that continue to soil the otherwise revered body must not be allowed to be associated with it.
To achieve this, systems must be put in place to make it difficult for criminally-minded officials to embark on their nefarious activities. And where anyone attempts or succeeds in perpetrating any fraudulent acts, the system should be able to fish such a person out in little or no time while the will must be mustered at all times to punish offenders as a disincentive for would-be fraudsters and enemies of the people.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics3 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics3 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics3 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News3 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Business3 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Politics3 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
