Connect with us

News

Presidency: Atiku Sets Up Anti-Rigging C’ttee

Published

on

Presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, has constituted an anti-rigging committee to counter alleged plans by the All Progressives Congress (APC) to suppress votes in his stronghold in the February 16, 2019 election.
A source close to the former vice president told newsmen that Atiku’s major concerns about the 2019 presidential election are the security agencies and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
“In a free and fair election, Atiku is confident of defeating President Muhammadu Buhari. However, given the intelligence reports at his disposal, INEC and security agencies are the main obstacle to his winning the 2019 election. This informed the setting up of the anti-rigging committee,” the source said.
The identities of the anti-rigging committee are still being guarded.
Atiku is hoping to make a big haul of votes from South-South, South-East and North-Central geo-political zones in the presidential election.
But there are fears that APC might militarise the zones to whittle down the chances of the party in these areas to favour President Buhari.
The anti-rigging committee is to work directly with the presidential candidate, the PDP Presidential Campaign Council and the organs of the party.
Its duty is to, among other things, pre-empt any rigging strategy of APC, raise early rigging alert, check plot by the ruling party to rig the election, as well as mobilise local and international groups against electoral malpractice.
According to the source, PDP’s fears that the election might not be free and fair were heightened by President Buhari’s refusal to assent to the 2010 Electoral Amendment Bill passed by the National Assembly.
He further disclosed that the party does not have confidence that the electoral umpire will conduct free and fair elections.
“What happened in Ekiti and Osun states is clear to everybody. Buhari is not ready for free and fair election. That is why we are taking pre-emptive measure,” he stated.
Another source stated that PDP has uncovered plot by the ruling party to suppress the support base of its presidential candidate.
“We know that the Operation Python Dance campaign by the military is to help APC rig the presidential election.
“There will be heavy military presence mostly in the South-South, South-East and then, North-Central. These are PDP areas.
“That is why our party is rejecting it. We are not in a war situation. The military should go to North-East and Zamfara State where there are insurgents and cattle rustlers.
“There is no threat to peace in the South and North Central zones,” the source who asked not to be named, said.
Kola Ologbondiyan, Director, Media and Publicity of PDP, however, said he was not aware of any plan by the party to create anti-rigging committee.
He disclosed that what the party is demanding from INEC is transparency in the conduct of the election.
“We are demanding that international and local observers should be allowed into INEC’s situation room where the transmission of votes will take place.
“You recall in 1993, it was clear that Abiola was winning because of transparency.
“So, instead of INEC locking themselves in one situation room and manipulate the election, they should allow the European Union (EU) and United States (U.S.) observers to participate in the collation of results. That is how we can guarantee transparency,” Ologbondiyan stated
Spokesperson of APC presidential campaign, Festus Keyamo (SAN), said PDP is suffering from depression.
“They have ran out of ideas, ran out of what to say. They are now talking like demented fellows. They have said this million times without proof. That is sign of depression,” Keyamo said.
INEC said the position of PDP did not represent the general opinion of Nigerians.
Chief Press Secretary to INEC Chairman, Rotimi Oyekanmi, said the allegation has become the familiar song by the party, which Nigerians were tired of hearing.
Oyekanmi advised PDP that it is not compulsory for any political party to field candidates in the 2019 general elections, especially if that political party does not have confidence in the electoral body organizing it.
“If you are a student who wants to sit for the Senior School Certificate Examination (SSCE) and you don’t have confidence in the West African Examinations Council (WAEC), then you don’t have any business sitting for the examination. You can go to Ghana, Sierra Leone or the Sudan to sit for an equivalent examination.
“There are 74 political parties taking part in the presidential election. Let those who have confidence in INEC participate and we will not disappoint them.
“Nigerians have confidence in the Commission and we are happy about the feedback we are getting,” he added.
Also, INEC said it is not considering the party’s demand at the moment.
INEC’s Director, Voter Education and Publicity (VEP), Oluwole Osaze-Uzzi, said that there is no country that allows international observers in its situation room.
Meanwhile, our correspondent learnt that disbursement of PDP’s campaign funds would be done at ward level and “not to an individual.”
“Other members of the ward will have to be present and the money has to be accounted for.
“We discovered that in 2015, many people collected campaign money and disappeared. We don’t want it to happen this time around.
“The national chairman has given orders that every party member must deliver his or her ward. If you are strong go to your ward and work. We don’t want Abuja politicians. Many of these people hanging around Wadata Plaza (PDP National Secretariat) are not known in their wards,” the source said.
Before now, PDP had declared “operation deliver your ward” to its members as basis for political reward.
Atiku, at a meeting with members of the Board of Trustees (BoT) immediately after securing the party’s ticket, insisted that reward system would be based on electoral performance of members.

Continue Reading

News

S’South Group Writes Tinubu, Seeks Executive Order On 13% Derivation Fund

Published

on

A socio-political group in the South-South, the Niger Delta Civil Society Forum, has written an open letter to President Bola Tinubu, raising constitutional concerns over what it described as the illegal and unconstitutional implementation of the 13 per cent Derivation Fund in the country.

In the open letter, signed by its Coordinator, Ezekiel Kagbala, copies of which were made available to journalists in Warri, yesterday, the forum warned that “the prevailing practice undermines the supremacy of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and continues to shortchange oil-producing communities of the Niger Delta.”

While noting that it was “compelled to speak out in the spirit of patriotism, constitutionalism, and justice,” the forum maintained that “oil and gas matters are expressly listed under Item 39 of the Exclusive Legislative List in Part I of the Second Schedule to the Constitution, covering mines and minerals, including oilfields, oil mining, geological surveys, and natural gas.”

The forum appealed to Tinubu to, “without further delay, issue an Executive Order to correct the alleged anomalies by ensuring lawful administration of the 13% Derivation Fund.”

This, it stated, should include the establishment of a 13% Derivation Fund Board in each oil- and gas-producing state and the constitution of a Presidential Monitoring Committee to guarantee transparency, accountability, and strict constitutional compliance.

“This appeal is not political; it is constitutional. It is not adversarial; it is corrective,” the forum said, reiterating that “continued unconstitutional handling of the Derivation Fund undermines the rule of law and deprives host communities of the justice the Constitution guarantees them.”

The open letter added, “By the doctrine of separation of powers, only the Federal Government, acting through the President, has jurisdiction over matters on the Exclusive Legislative List.

“State governors and state assemblies lack constitutional authority to legislate on, administer, or appropriate funds derived from oil and gas resources.

“Yet, for over thirty years, governors of oil- and gas-producing states and their state assemblies have exercised control over derivation funds.”

The forum described the ongoing practice as “persistent constitutional overreach and illegality.”

It cited Section 162(2) of the 1999 Constitution, which provides that the principle of derivation shall be “not less than thirteen per cent of the revenue accruing to the Federation Account from any natural resources.”

The forum argued that under the derivation principle, the 13% Derivation Fund is a first-line charge on the Federation Account, constitutionally set aside before the remaining 87 per cent is shared among the Federal, State, and Local Governments.

“In law and practice, first-line charges are paid directly to beneficiaries. The Federal Government is a second-line charge, states third-line, and local governments fourth-line,” the forum explained.

It added, “The current practice of handing the 13% Derivation Fund to state governors to administer has no constitutional foundation and undermines transparency, accountability, and the intent of the Constitution.”

The forum recalled that when Chief Wellington Okrika, popularly known as “Mr. 13 Per Cent,” spearheaded the historic struggle for the derivation principle, state governors were not part of that agitation.

According to the NDCSF, no compensation or formal recognition was ever accorded to Chief Okrika, despite his central role in advancing the derivation principle from which oil-producing states now benefit.

“The present mindless abuse of the derivation principle by political actors who neither fought for it nor respect its constitutional foundations is unjust, morally troubling, and capable of attracting international intervention if allowed to continue unchecked,” the forum posited.

To further support its position, the NDCSF referenced constitutional precedents. It recalled that under President Shehu Shagari, when derivation stood at 1.5 per cent, the funds were not disbursed to governors but managed through presidential oversight and monitoring structures.

Similarly, the forum noted that when General Ibrahim Babangida increased derivation to 3 per cent, he established OMPADEC to centrally administer the funds, in recognition of oil and gas being on the Exclusive Legislative List.

“These actions respected constitutional boundaries and provided clear models for lawful and transparent administration,” the letter stated.

The NDCSF expressed concern over what it described as persistent silence by federal authorities despite repeated submissions of documents and constitutional references on the matter.

Concluding, the group said it trusts in Tinubu’s commitment to constitutionalism and reform and expressed hope for decisive action that will finally align the implementation of the 13% Derivation Fund with the letter and spirit of the Constitution.

 

 

Continue Reading

News

Labour Issues Ultimatum To FG Over Wage Arrears

Published

on

Organised labour in the Federal public service has issued a Friday deadline to the Federal Government, demanding the immediate release of funds to settle three months’ outstanding wage awards and other pending allowances owed to workers across Ministries, Departments and Agencies.

The leadership of the Joint National Public Service Negotiating Council (Trade Union Side) conveyed the ultimatum in a letter addressed to the Federal Ministry of Labour and Employment, warning that failure to meet the February 27, 2026, deadline would compel the eight unions in the civil service to take decisive action.

The unions accused the government of withholding funds meant for workers, alleging that relevant agencies were prepared to process payments once the Ministry of Finance released the required funds.

The wage award dispute, which has persisted for over two years, followed the Federal Government’s approval of a N70,000 minimum wage after the removal of fuel subsidy.

Labour leaders stated that although partial payments were made after sustained pressure, three months remain unpaid since July 2024, heightening tension within the federal workforce.

In a letter addressed to the Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy, the union stated: “This wage award has dragged on for over two years now since the implementation of the N70,000 minimum wage payment was approved.”

The unions recalled that “the wage award was approved as a cushioning measure following fuel subsidy removal and was to run until the commencement of the new minimum wage implementation in July 2024.

“It is beyond the imagination and expectations of federal workers that the Federal Government left five months unpaid ab initio; not until there was much pressure did the Federal Government effect the staggered payment of two months, leaving the balance of three months since July 2024 unpaid.”

The JNPSNC further alleged that “all relevant government agencies responsible for effecting payment are prepared to do so but are constrained by the non-release of funds by the Ministry of Finance.

“Available information revealed that all government agencies responsible for the payment of the wage award are ready to pay, but this is subject to the release of funds by the Honourable Minister of Finance, who is deliberately holding back the money.”

Beyond the wage award arrears, the unions listed other outstanding obligations requiring urgent attention, including promotion arrears for workers elevated more than three years ago, salary arrears for employees recruited between 2015 and 2024, and the proper implementation of a 40 per cent peculiar allowance based on the N70,000 minimum wage.

Warning of possible industrial action, the unions declared: “If the money meant for the payment of the wage award is not released on or before Friday, 27th February, 2026, the national leadership will take the bull by the horn and ensure appropriate actions are taken.”

They insisted that workers’ entitlements must not be treated with levity and that employees should not be subjected to undue hardship over delayed payments.

Copies of the letter were also forwarded to the Federal Ministry of Labour and Employment, the Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, the Nigeria Labour Congress, the Trade Union Congress, security agencies and affiliate unions for urgent attention.

Continue Reading

News

PDP Kicks As APC Wins FCT Council Polls

Published

on

The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) has inaugurated a special legal team to handle election petitions arising from last Saturday’s Area Council elections in the Federal Capital Territory.

This comes as the All Progressives Congress (APC) won in Abaji, Kwali, AMAC, and Bwari Area Councils, while the PDP secured victory only in Gwagwalada.

The Tide reports that the council elections were held on Saturday, February 21, 2026, across all six FCT area councils, including Abaji, AMAC, Bwari, Gwagwalada, Kuje, and Kwali.

Results announced so far by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) show that the All Progressives Congress (APC) won in Abaji, Kwali, AMAC, and Bwari Area Councils, while the PDP secured victory only in Gwagwalada.

In a statement issued yesterday by PDP’s National Publicity Secretary, Ini Ememobong, the party congratulated its candidates, who emerged winners in the chairmanship and councilor elections.

The opposition party acknowledged the victories, noting that the number of wins was lower than expected but significant given the alleged irregularities during the polls.

“We specifically congratulate the Chairman-elect of Gwagwalada Area Council, Mohammed Kasim, and the councillors who have been declared successful by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

“This victory, though less in number than we anticipated, is particularly gladdening because it is against the background of unprecedented intimidation, high-powered money politics, and brazen executive brigandage,” the statement read.

Ememobong claimed that there are reports and video evidence indicating voter intimidation and unlawful conduct that influenced the outcome of the elections.

“Reports and video evidence abound where armed security personnel were used to cart away result sheets in polling units, intimidate voters, and unduly influence the outcome of the elections.”

To address complaints and litigations arising from the polls, he said the party has set up a legal team headed by its National Legal Adviser, Shafi Bara’u, Esq.

The statement urged candidates with legitimate grievances to contact the Legal Adviser promptly, as delays could jeopardise their chances in election petition cases.

“The incredible voter apathy in these polls is a direct response to the anti-people Electoral Act 2026, where the people have completely lost faith in the electoral outcomes from elections conducted under this Act.

“These Local Council polls may just be a foreshadowing of the forthcoming general elections in 2027 if changes are not urgently made,” the statement added.

The PDP called on the National Assembly and the President to take corrective action to safeguard the integrity of Nigeria’s democracy.

 

Continue Reading

Trending