Editorial
2019:As Campaigns Begin …
In line with the timetable announced by the Independent National Electoral Commis-sion (INEC), electioneering campaigns by the nation’s political parties formally kicked off last Sunday.
Without much ado, some frontline presidential candidates unveiled their policy plans to woo the electorate that had been inundated with several failed promises.
While the nation awaits other candidates to join the campaign fray, we urge politicians to tread with caution, especially in the way and manner they go about their campaigns.
Already, President Muhammadu Buhari has set the tone by advising politicians against setting the country ablaze with their unguarded utterances, saying, “we do not have any other country apart from Nigeria”.
Other eminent personalities within and outside Nigeria, including the international community have ceaselessly canvassed the need for free, fair and peaceful elections in 2019.
They have harped on the imperatives of politicians jettisoning hate speech, the use of violence and other vices that may undermine the smooth conduct of the 2019 general elections and cause mayhem in the country.
The Tide agrees no less. We expect all candidates to base their campaigns on issues and not to indulge in political mudslinging that would not do the country any good in the final analysis.
The beleaguered people of this country would want to see electioneering campaigns that are devoid of violence, rancour, bitter outpourings and religious and sectional interests.
We believe that the campaigns that just kicked off offer the political class and, indeed, the candidates the opportunity to sell themselves and their parties’ manifestoes to the electorate rather than throw mud at any opponent. What this means is that candidates are expected to be constructive and strictly address their minds to issues that can ameliorate the anguish of the masses of the nation, and maintain high level of decorum in their campaigns.
We recall that the 2015 peace accord reached by politicians played very important role in that year’s elections, notwithstanding the controversy that later trailed the exercise. We, therefore, welcome new efforts towards this end.
After all, the electioneering campaigns are all about power and leadership. And leadership, being a vehicle for the exercise of power, we expect the candidates to convince the country on how they can crystallise our purposes as a nation and work towards the accomplishment of those purposes.
In other words, candidates are expected to speedily address themselves to identifying the key problems of the nation, assessing their magnitudes and analysing them with a clear-minded, clear-head objectivity in such a manner that can convince the electorate that they are capable of adopting a long-term corporate approach towards their solution.
It is against this background that in the next few weeks, Nigerians would want to witness a vibrant and robust debate amongst candidates, especially on issues that touch on the economy, infrastructure, manpower development, health, education andsecurity, among others.
There is no gainsaying the fact that government in the world can enjoy the blessings of legitimacy and popular support while the economy is frail and recovery not in sight. Regrettably, politicians have been taciturn about how the economy can be turned around and the years of waste healed. It is helpful, therefore, that candidates put the issue on the campaigns as the times demand fresh insights instead of merely dressing up old remedies that appear to merely exacerbate the problem. A transparent campaign that would genuinely discuss the husbanding of our commonwealth for the benefit of all, we believe, is a prerequisite to strengthening our fledging democracy.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
Editorial
INEC’s Threat Alert Deserves Urgent Attention
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) disclosure of an alleged plot to target its ad hoc personnel ahead of the 2027 general elections demand urgent national attention. The reported arrest of suspects, with intelligence support from the Department of State Services (DSS), is encouraging, but must not breed complacency. Any attack on electoral workers threatens not only human lives but also Nigerians’ constitutional right to choose their leaders through credible elections. The alleged conspiracy must be thoroughly investigated, its sponsors identified and all those found culpable prosecuted.
Particularly troubling is the reported targeting of National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) members, who play a vital role in Nigeria’s electoral process. Many serve far from home and undertake sensitive assignments at polling units and other electoral locations. As civilians, they should not be exposed to intimidation, abduction or violence without adequate protection. If election workers are vulnerable, the safety of other officials, observers and voters cannot be guaranteed.
Nigeria’s electoral history offers painful lessons. Human Rights Watch reported in Nigeria’s Post-Election Violence, published in May 2011, that more than 800 people died in the violence following the 2011 general elections. NYSC members serving as electoral officials were among the victims. This tragedy underscores the deadly consequences of political tension, incitement and disputed outcomes. Nigeria must act on the latest warning before another preventable disaster occurs.
INEC deserves recognition for uncovering the alleged plot, while the DSS and other security agencies merit commendation for their reported assistance. However, arrests are only the beginning. Investigators must establish the suspects’ identities, motives, networks and intended targets, ensuring that evidence is admissible in court. The process must remain impartial and free from political interference. Credible public updates are also necessary, provided they do not compromise investigations or operational security.
The authorities must adopt a comprehensive, intelligence-led security strategy for 2027. INEC’s proposed security conference should produce practical measures developed in collaboration with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security (ICCES), the police, the DSS and other relevant agencies. Threat assessments should guide personnel deployment, secure transportation, emergency communications, evacuation procedures and rapid response. Protection must extend beyond polling day to the distribution of sensitive materials, collation centres and the safe return of ad hoc personnel.
Those who provide intelligence must also be protected from retaliation. Confidential reporting channels and appropriate safeguards should be established for informants and others assisting investigations. Equally, security deployments must not intimidate voters or facilitate political repression. Personnel should act professionally, impartially and proportionately, within the law. Clear mechanisms for reporting misconduct and investigating abuses are essential to maintaining public confidence.
The threat also highlights broader concerns about trust in the electoral system. The European Union Election Observation Mission’s June 2023 final report identified shortcomings in transparency and operational implementation during Nigeria’s 2023 general elections, alongside concerns about the legal framework and electoral dispute resolution. Credible elections require more than security; they depend on transparent procedures, accountable officials and consistent enforcement of electoral laws. INEC must demonstrate measurable progress in addressing previously identified weaknesses.
Voter apathy presents another challenge. INEC’s published figures indicate that approximately 25 million people voted in the 2023 presidential election, out of about 93.5 million registered voters, a turnout of roughly 26.7 per cent. Although insecurity is not the sole cause of low participation, threats against electoral personnel can heighten public anxiety and discourage voters from exercising their franchise. INEC should strengthen civic education, improve polling accessibility and communicate procedures clearly. Political parties, civil society and the media must promote peaceful participation and reject electoral intimidation.
Misinformation and manipulated digital content pose additional risks. False reports, fabricated announcements and deepfake videos can inflame tensions, impersonate officials and mislead voters. INEC should establish a well-resourced, rapid-response communication system supported by verified digital channels and timely public statements. Collaboration with credible media organisations and fact-checkers would help counter falsehoods without suppressing legitimate criticism. Clear, consistent communication is indispensable, as administrative confusion and delayed explanations often allow rumours to spread.
Electoral integrity must also begin within INEC itself. The chairman’s warning against partisanship, negligence, extortion and ethical misconduct deserves serious attention. Security measures cannot compensate for officials who abuse their positions or disregard established procedures. INEC should strengthen staff training, ensure transparent recruitment and deployment, provide secure channels for reporting misconduct and enforce disciplinary rules consistently. Allegations of bribery and political interference must be investigated regardless of rank, while ad hoc personnel should receive adequate briefing, support and prompt payment.
The legal framework also requires clarity and consistent enforcement. INEC should explain the precise provisions and applicability of Section 26 of the Electoral Act 2026, including the obligations of electoral officials and security personnel, and publish authoritative guidance on neutrality and professional conduct. Complaints by opposition parties that they have been prevented from campaigning in certain states must likewise be investigated impartially. Any established violations should attract appropriate corrective action. Electoral fairness requires not only impartial polling officials but also lawful campaigning, access to competing viewpoints and freedom from intimidation.
The alleged plot against INEC’s ad hoc personnel is a warning against complacency ahead of the 2027 general election. Governments, security agencies, INEC, political parties and civil society must work together to prevent violence, punish misconduct and protect citizens’ participation. The commission should communicate its security priorities, maintain accessible threat-reporting channels and provide periodic updates on preparedness. Nigeria’s democracy cannot be safeguarded by assurances alone; it requires demonstrable preparation, impartial law enforcement and an unwavering commitment to free, fair and credible elections.
-
Politics3 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics3 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics3 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News4 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
Business4 days agoNigeria Loses N17tr Yearly To Abandoned Projects
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
-
Politics3 days ago
2027: AKPABIO ENVISAGES TINUBU’S VICTORY IN SOUTH SOUTH REGION
-
Politics3 days ago
Asaba Political Violence: Police Confirm One Dead, Delta Govt Urges Probe
