Editorial
Lessons From The US Elections
On Tuesday, November 8, this year, Americans went to the polls to elect a new President that would succeed incumbent Barack Obama. It was a most unusual electioneering process characterised by one of the most polarising, vulgar and racist campaigns by the two main political parties, the Republicans otherwise called the Grand Old Party (GOP) and the Democrats.
The defining issues were the economy, jobs, immigration, foreign policy, criminal justice reforms, healthcare and future of the Supreme Court among many others. There were three presidential debates, where, the two leading candidates, GOP candidate, billionaire businessman, Donald Trump and former Secretary of State, Senator Hillary Clinton, pleaded their cases on various issues.
Although some parts of those debates delved into the individual candidates’ private lives, of scandals and flip flops, they afforded Americans the opportunity to truly appraise the candidates’ main ideological differences and help make up their minds.
Yes, the candidate adjudged winner of all three debates, did not eventually win the elections, thus, questioning the efficacy of the exercise, it nonetheless underscored the valid premium placed on the right of the people to be well-informed.
More than that, it reaffirmed the belief in the supremacy of the voter to whom the candidates must plead their cases.
Interestingly, even with all the distractions, actuated by e-mail scandals involving the Democratic candidate and accusations of sexual harassments against the GOP candidate, both contestants remained on points and repeatedly attempted to persuade the people about how the other lacked the temperament, civility and good conscience to occupy the world’s most powerful office.
On the day of the elections proper, as it was during early voting, voters, in long queues, patiently waited and voted for the candidates of their choice. There were no armed security guards neither where there thugs from either sides to intimidate the other.
One significant issue during the campaigns was the disruption of President BarrackBarack Obama’s campaign speech by a protester. Rather than ‘bundle’ him out as would Nigerian many operatives, the security guards took a cue from the President who ordered Democratic supporters to show respect and not to boo the intruder. Obama instead justified the protester’s right to differ and advised his supporters to vote against the intruder’s party and not to boo.
Another striking lesson was the fact that although Barack Obama was not on the ballot, his eight year legacy was, and 50 went all out to campaign for his preferred candidate with unimaginable passion. Yet, he endured the abuses by candidate of the opposing party who at some point questioned Obama’s nationality. And in all those, no one was invited for questioning by security agents or harassed in any way for the exercise of their right to free speech.
In the end, the President’s preferred candidate lost. But it did not push him to truncate the process in any way or encourage his own to challenge the outcome through litigation. Both candidates and the American people have faith in their electoral process, even though the GOP candidate, at some point in the campaign expressed doubts about a fair process, his ploy many saw as a means of discouraging voter turn-out among supporters of his opponents’.
By and large, nearly all Americans consider the electoral process as fair and various poll handlers, credible. This is the biggest challenge to Nigeria’s democracy, an electoral process that would protect every vote, where, all votes count and one that strengthens the people’s faith in the ballot box.
Such is the reputation Nigerians expect of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). They expect the commission to be dependable, trust-worthy and non-partisan in the discharge of its constitutional responsibilities and not submit to the whims of people in authority.
Nigerians are agreed that most of the gains made in that respect by the Prof Attahiru Jega-led INEC have gradually frittered away, with inconclusive elections replacing free, fair and credible polls. Nigeria cannot be America over-night but we must strive to build structures, cultures and institutions that would drive a truly credible electoral process.
The key lesson to be drawn from the November 8, American elections is that the people have faith in their electoral process and naturally consider any outcome as representative of the will of the American people. Nigeria can work towards same. Yes we can.
Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.
What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.
It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.
According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.
The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?
In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.
We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.
The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.
Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.
Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.
Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.
This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.
Nigeria’s Revenue Mobilisation Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC) has unveiled a gratuitous proposal to increase the salaries of political and public office holders in the country. This plan seeks to fatten the pay packets of the president, vice-president, governors, deputy governors, and members of the National and State Assemblies. At a time when the nation is struggling to steady its economy, the suggestion that political leaders should be rewarded with more money is not only misplaced but insulting to the sensibilities of the ordinary Nigerian.
What makes the proposal even more opprobrious is the dire economic condition under which citizens currently live. The cost of living crisis has worsened, inflation has eroded the purchasing power of workers, and the naira continues to tumble against foreign currencies. The majority of Nigerians are living hand to mouth, with many unable to afford basic foodstuffs, medical care, and education. Against this backdrop, political office holders, who already enjoy obscene allowances, perks, and privileges, should not even contemplate a salary increase.
It is, therefore, not surprising that the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has stepped in to challenge this development. SERAP has filed a lawsuit against the RMAFC to halt the implementation of this salary increment. This resolute move represents a voice of reason and accountability at a time when public anger against political insensitivity is palpable. The group is rightly insisting that the law must serve as a bulwark against impunity.
According to a statement issued by SERAP’s Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the commission has been dragged before the Federal High Court in Abuja. Although a hearing date remains unconfirmed, the momentous step of seeking judicial redress reflects a determination to hold those in power accountable. SERAP has once again positioned itself as a guardian of public interest by challenging an elite-centric policy.
The case, registered as suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/1834/2025, specifically asks the court to determine “whether RMAFC’s proposed salary hike for the president, vice-president, governors and their deputies, and lawmakers in Nigeria is not unlawful, unconstitutional and inconsistent with the rule of law.” This formidable question goes to the very heart of democratic governance: can those entrusted with public resources decide their own pay rises without violating the constitution and moral order?
In its pleadings, SERAP argues that the proposed hike runs foul of both the 1999 Nigerian Constitution and the RMAFC Act. By seeking a judicial declaration that such a move is unlawful, unconstitutional, and inconsistent with the rule of law, the group has placed a spotlight on the tension between self-serving leadership and constitutionalism. To trivialise such an issue would be harum-scarum, for the constitution remains the supreme authority guiding governance.
We wholeheartedly commend SERAP for standing firm, while we roundly condemn RMAFC’s selfish proposal. Political office should never be an avenue for financial aggrandisement. Since our leaders often pontificate sacrifice to citizens, urging them to tighten their belts in the face of economic turbulence, the same leaders must embody sacrifice themselves. Anything short of this amounts to double standards and betrayal of trust.
The Nigerian economy is not buoyant enough to shoulder the additional cost of a salary increase for political leaders. Already, lawmakers and executives enjoy allowances that are grossly disproportionate to the national average income. These earnings are sufficient not only for their needs but also their unchecked greed. To even consider further increments under present circumstances is egregious, a slap in the face of ordinary workers whose minimum wage remains grossly insufficient.
Resources earmarked for such frivolities should instead be channelled towards alleviating the suffering of citizens and improving the nation’s productive capacity. According to United Nations statistics, about 62.9 per cent of Nigerians were living in multidimensional poverty in 2021, compared to 53.7 per cent in 2017. Similarly, nearly 30.9 per cent of the population lives below the international poverty line of US$2.15 per day. These figures paint a stark picture: Nigeria is a poor country by all measurable standards, and any extra naira diverted to elite pockets deepens this misery.
Besides, the timing of this proposal could not be more inappropriate. At a period when unemployment is soaring, inflation is crippling households, and insecurity continues to devastate communities, the RMAFC has chosen to pursue elite enrichment. It is widely known that Nigeria’s economy is in a parlous state, and public resources should be conserved and wisely invested. Political leaders must show prudence, not profligacy.
Another critical dimension is the national debt profile. According to the Debt Management Office, Nigeria’s total public debt as of March 2025 stood at a staggering N149.39 trillion. External debt obligations also remain heavy, with about US$43 billion outstanding by September 2024. In such a climate of debt-servicing and borrowing to fund budgets, it is irresponsible for political leaders to even table the idea of inflating their salaries further. Debt repayment, not self-reward, should occupy their minds.
This ignoble proposal is insensitive, unnecessary, and profoundly reckless. It should be discarded without further delay. Public office is a trust, not an entitlement to wealth accumulation. Nigerians deserve leaders who will share in their suffering, lead by example, and prioritise the common good over self-indulgence. Anything less represents betrayal of the social contract and undermines the fragile democracy we are striving to build.
-
Sports1 day agoPlateau Wins Kanemi, As Bayelsa, Bendel Played 1-1
-
Education1 day agoVC Congratulates Igwe on Appointment as Pro-Chancellor
-
Politics1 day agoAlleged Attack On Abure In Benin, LP Calls For Investigation
-
Sports1 day agoLa Liga: Atletico Bring Real Back To Earth
-
Maritime1 day agoCustoms, MAN Consent On 4% FoB Exemptions, Manufacturing Support Measures
-
Rivers1 day agoIAUE Emerges Winner Of National Campus Debate, 2025
-
News1 day agoFUBARA: UNDERUTILISED SEAPORTS DENYING RIVERS ECONOMIC PROSPERITY ……..Hosts NPA Board, Mgt On Courtesy Visit
-
Opinion1 day ago94 Years From A Turning Point