Editorial
Ekiti Election: Matters Arising
Even as the ovation that greeted the
outcome of the Ekiti Governorship
Election across Nigeria was yet to die down, the All Progressives Congress (APC), whose candidate finished second at the polls said it would challenge the outcome of the election.
While the party reserves the right to pursue what it considers to be an infringement, many Nigerians would have liked to use the Ekiti election as a template for future elections in Nigeria. This is because developments during and after the election presented the picture of what the new Nigeria should be.
It was most unlike any other election in Nigeria, it was a sharp deviation from the usual expression of bitterness and the threat of endless electoral litigations that leaves the politicians, the parties, the electoral process and the country as a whole worse of.
But with this threat by APC to head for the tribunals, the gains of the Ekiti election may yet become another loss for the enthronement of a decent democratic culture in Nigeria. Indeed, if the party would walk away from this plan, they would endear themselves to more Nigerians and give Nigeria the one example that democratic minded citizens would celebrate.
As a matter of fact, The Tide was going to sing the praises of Ekiti and its political class for what had been described as the best election in Nigeria so far. Incidentally, everybody appeared to agree on the conduct and result, including independent monitors from within and outside Nigeria.
Clearly, we were also going to commend the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), the security agencies and the two major parties for giving Nigeria something to be cheerful about. Indeed, compared to the elections of Anambra and Edo States, the Ekiti election was world-class.
It is already on record that the Ekiti election which had all the signs of potential crisis went down without an incident because of the adequate provision of security. Similarly, not only did the people go out to vote, INEC also was on ground early with all the materials, as never before.
But for us, the icing on the cake was the maturity of the incumbent who lost to concede defeat and congratulate the Governor-elect. That was not all, they also started talks on how to take the State and its people to the next level. Unbelievable!, but it happened in Nigeria.
The Tide thinks that if other States would borrow as leaf from Ekiti, not only would more decent people take interest in partisan politics, the authorities would also not have the reason to deploy so many soldiers and other security agencies to man electoral duties.
Another wish, we came up with was for INEC to convince the authorities to stagger elections in Nigeria. This is because the level of success achieved at Ekiti would not have been possible without the concentration of forces, facilities and focus that cannot be replicated all over the country at the same time.
Even before the National Conference takes up the merit of staggered elections, the National Assembly can actually amend the Electoral Act to accommodate this initiative. Clearly, elections can be done at geo-political zones at weekly intervals. Yes, it would have its disadvantages, but it will make elections safer and more credible.
The beauty of this plan is that both INEC and the security agencies will not be overwhelmed, as forces from other regions can be deployed to enforce order and allow the Nigerian to participate at elections without fear and enjoy the privilege of electing their leaders and not those imposed on them.
We think that the political class has played politics enough with elections. The truth is that majority of Nigerians are now more enlightened and desire a change. That feeling that ran through Nigeria when Dr Kayode Fayemi, Governor of Ekiti State and Peter Ayodele Fayose, the Governor-elect of Ekiti State embraced each other is what everyone want to experience again.
Over the years, election matters have not served the best interest of Nigeria. Even as the attainment of justice is still of grave concern, election matters have resulted in waste of time and money; creation of bad-blood, distracted governance and compromised the judiciary.
Editorial
2027: Beyond IGP’s Billboards Protection Order
As Nigeria moves toward the 2027 general elections and campaign activities intensify, violence against opposition politicians has become an issue that can no longer be overlooked. What should be a season of competing ideas is increasingly turning into a test of intimidation, and early signs suggest that those challenging the ruling establishment are the primary targets.
It was, therefore, welcome news when the Inspector-General of Police, Olatunji Disu, warned politicians, political thugs and others against destroying, defacing or removing campaign posters, banners and billboards. In a statement issued in Abuja by the Force Public Relations Officer, CSP Ani Iniedu, the police condemned such acts as political intolerance, directed Commissioners of Police in all 36 States and the Federal Capital Territory to take preventive measures, and warned that sponsors would also face prosecution. The police rightly described such vandalism as a criminal act that undermines parties’ and candidates’ freedom to canvass for votes.
But billboards are replaceable; human lives are not. While applauding the IGP’s stance, we urge him to extend the same stern warning and enforcement zeal to thugs who assault opposition members during campaigns. A police force that punishes the tearing of a poster but ignores the breaking of a skull will have its priorities questioned. Allowing such attacks to continue could erode the foundations of our democracy.
Consider the African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential campaign flag-off in Sokoto State on November 4, 2026. The party alleged that the State Government denied it access to public facilities, sealed its campaign venue and pressured hotels to reject its delegates, forcing it to hold the rally at its secretariat. The Sokoto authorities, however, denied instructing hotels to turn guests away. More seriously, two suspected ADC supporters were reportedly shot along the Sokoto–Wurno Road while travelling to the venue, allegedly by operatives of the Sokoto State Community Guards.
Whatever the truth of these competing accounts, a shooting demands more than press statements. It requires a transparent, independent investigation and prosecution where warranted. Sokoto was not an isolated incident. The following day in Birnin Kebbi, the ADC presidential campaign convoy was reportedly attacked by armed gangs. Amnesty International said vehicles were vandalised, people assaulted with cutlasses and roads blocked, while the party’s Kebbi governorship candidate, Abubakar Malami, alleged that media equipment was destroyed and tear gas deployed. His convoy had suffered a similar attack in the city in September 2025.
The Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC) has suffered similar attacks. On November 4, hoodlums stoned the motorcade of its presidential candidate, Peter Obi, and running mate, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, at Watt Market roundabout in Calabar, Cross River State. Police reported arresting a 27-year-old suspect, Victor Edet, although it remains unclear whether he has been arraigned. The State Government has denied suggestions that ruling-party supporters were responsible. Worse, in Asaba, Delta State, one person was killed and five injured when suspected thugs attacked an NDC rally. A death at a political rally is no longer a warning; it is a damning indictment of the prevailing political climate.
Even critics of the establishment who are not frontrunners have not been spared. Omoyele Sowore, presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC), was attacked by suspected thugs at a restaurant in Ado-Ekiti on October 30. He alleged that the assailants were linked to the Ekiti State Government House and that the Department of State Services leaked his location. Both the State Government and the security service denied involvement, while the police reported a minor injury and a discreet investigation. These conflicting accounts make an independent, publicly reported inquiry indispensable.
What deepens the concern is the Federal Government’s apparent silence. We are unaware of any specific, forceful condemnation of these assaults, even as All Progressives Congress (APC) rallies appear to proceed nationwide without incident. Such silence can easily be misconstrued as complicity, regardless of intent.
According to the Centre for Democracy and Development, 109 election-related deaths were recorded in the build-up to the 2023 polls. The Kimpact Development Initiative separately documented 238 incidents and 24 deaths during the general elections. Beyond Nigeria, Kenya’s 2007–08 post-election violence claimed more than 1,000 lives, according to the Waki Commission. Ghana, by contrast, enacted the Vigilantism and Related Offences Act in 2019 to curb party vigilante groups, a model worth studying.
The remedies are neither exotic nor expensive. The IGP should extend his directive to cover assaults on individuals and disruptions of rallies, while establishing a dedicated investigative unit to probe the Sokoto shooting and the attacks in Kebbi, Calabar, Asaba and Ado-Ekiti. It should publish the status of each case within a fixed period. Suspects must be prosecuted and their sponsors, regardless of party or position, brought to justice. State-backed security outfits, including the Community Guards, should be audited and barred from partisan duties.
The Federal Government must speak and act unequivocally. President Tinubu should specifically condemn attacks on opposition candidates and direct all security agencies to guarantee equal protection for every party. Governors must ensure equal access to public facilities for registered parties. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), which has warned of fines and imprisonment under the Electoral Act 2026 for inflammatory campaign conduct, should enforce the Code of Conduct for Political Parties. Working with the Inter-Agency Consultative Committee on Election Security, it should publish a joint security plan covering campaigns, polling, and collation. Parties must discipline their supporters, courts expedite electoral-violence trials, and civil society and the media maintain a public record of incidents and their outcomes.
The credibility of the 2027 elections is at stake. An election is credible only when every contender can campaign, travel, assemble and speak freely, without fear. Without a free opposition, there can be no meaningful democracy. Nigeria is not a one-party State, and law enforcement agencies must demonstrate their neutrality through action, not communiqués. The campaign atmosphere is too tense to be left to chance. Billboards deserve protection, certainly, but citizens deserve it far more.
Editorial
Champions At Last: Well Done, Flamingos
Editorial
Kula Tragedy, Needless Loss Of Lives
-
Politics5 days agoLG CITY BOY COORDINATOR HAILS WIKE’S SUPPORT FOR ONYESOH, TINUBU
-
Politics5 days ago
DIRI INAUGURATES APC CAMPAIGN COUNCIL, SETS MILLION VOTES TARGET FOR TINUBU
-
Politics5 days agoNDC Candidate Urges Oborevwori To Probe Asaba Political Violence
-
News5 days agoArmy Recovers X Account After Hack Attempt
-
News17 hours ago
RSG Reaffirms Commitment To STEM Education, Technological Advancement
-
Business20 hours ago
‘NUJ, NPA’s Partnership Would Boost Port Producrivity, Economic Growth’
-
News17 hours agoIGP Warns Police Officers Against Partisanship …Directs Regular Engagement With Journalists
-
Politics5 days ago
2027: Oborevwori Tasks Media On Fair, Accurate Reporting
