Connect with us

Opinion

Emergency Rule Extension; How Desirable?

Published

on

Last week, President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan
sent a proposal to the National Assembly seeking the extension of the state of emergency in the North Eastern States of Borno, Yobe and Adamawa even as Senators from these states have vowed to ensure that the proposal does not sail through.
What do the public think about the contentious issue? Our chief correspondent, Calista Ezeaku and photographer went round the town to seek answers to the question.

Comrade Larry Owhonda – Chairman National Union of Printing Publishing Rivers State.
Well, the proposal by the president to extend the state of emergency in the three North Eastern States of Borno, Yobe and Adamawa is good because the insurgency in these states is still not settled. If not for the emergency rule probably the number of casualties would have been more than what we are currently experiencing. On the issue of National Assembly members from the North East kicking against the extension and claiming that the emergency rule has not been effective, I think they are not being sincere. They can not say the emergency rule has not benefited them. If they say it has not benefitted them, they should go home and see whether they can stay. They can’t stay in Abuja and say it has not benefitted them while their people are suffering at home. They should even be grateful to the president because he cares for the people or else they cannot stay in Abuja and be talking about voting against the president and yet they say they are representing the people. They are not representing the people if that is the case. Because as legislators, they are even the ones who should give support to the president, making sure that this insurgency comes to an end by supporting the emergency rule.
I will even advocate that there should be total emergency, the governors should all go so that the military can take full control of that area, because even among the politicians there are informants to Boko Haram. So if there is total emergency rule, the military can now be on top of the security situation in that area.

Mr. Paul Daga – Journalist. I think that proposal is very appropriate. I say so because the rate of insurgency in the north is becoming alarming.  Just recently, over 200 Chibok School Girls were abducted and there is rampant cases of criminality. Every now and then, you hear people being killed. What that means, is that if the emergency rule was not in place, there would have been nobody in that region. Everybody would have ran away from there.
Yes, the emergency has been effective despite the abduction of the Chibok girls. But you don’t expect the military to be every where. Even we, over selves, have to be security conscious.
Even if we know that some security officials are around, we still have to employ some measure of security for ourselves. Those girls were taken in the night and you don’t know the terrain, you don’t know the nature of the area.
I disagree with the legislators from the north east saying the emergency rule has not yielded any positive result. During the last presidential media chat, the president rightly said that if we think the emergency rule is not working let’s ask all the security personnel to withdraw and you will see what happens there. So, it is working and the extension is necessary. It should be extended by six months after which we review the situation and if there is need for more extension, the president should go ahead and extend it. That place must be sanitised, I would have wished that the emergency rules should be total, every political structure should be disbanded, the army should take over the whole place so, that they can be very effective.

Mr. Abel Ohiomoje- Banker. Personally, I don’t think it is the extension of the state of emergency  that will solve the issue of insurgency in Nigeria. We really need to look at the root causes of this problem. I think it is politically motivated more than what they are portraying in the media. All these issues came into play when somebody from the minority ethnic group took over the mantle of leadership of the country. If Boko Haram is really a terrorist organization, how come we were not hearing much about them, they weren’t this active. I know they’ve been on ground for some years now but it wasn’t up to this scale. The issues of suicide bombing and so on just started when somebody from the minority took over power. The truth is that our mentality as Nigerians have to change especially the mentality of having three major tribes. I have never been a fan of it. I don’t see a country where you say that it is just three tribes out of so many that are meant to rule. That has been our problem from the genesis.
Secondly, our political offices are just too attractive financially. If our political offices are not that financially attractive, if it such that if you are going there, you know that you are going there for the service of humanity not to make millions, I don’t see how politicians will make it a do or die thing, such that they will go to the extent of arming youths to get their selfish interests carried out.
So far with the state of emergency in place, insecurity problem has not be  tackled. It is even growing by the day. So I don’t think extending it will be called for rather should be called off but the people from these communities must be involved in securing their localities. If they are involved I don’t see how Boko Haram members will be succeeding. This people are not spirits. They stay somewhere, they have neighbours. You can’t just tell me they disappear into tin air. From all the scenario being played out especially in the case of the Chibok girls kidnapping it is obvious that our security has been compromised. It has gone beyond what we are actually seeing on TV.

Comrade Kelvin Acha – Student. For me, I like the idea of extending the emergency rule because really the terrorists have been disturbing and if the state of emergency is not extended they will begin to disturb the nation the more I believe the state of emergency reduces the activities of Boko Haram a bit compare to when they are free. But if you ask me, I would have suggested that the extension should be for only four moths instead of six months that the president proposed.

Mr. Hope Solomon – Civil Servant. It is a good proposal. It’s a good thing to extend the emergence rule so that the place can be sanitised. As far as I am concerned, the emergency rule has been effective if it has not been effective Boko Haram would have taken over the North East. The way they came, they would have taken over the place. Northern Senators said they would vote against the emergency rule proposal. Tell me, is this country their own? But the president has the power to veto it even if they vote against it. For the lives of the people there, let the emergency rule continue. I will even prefer a total state of emergency. Let the military take absolute control. The senators are in Abuja and do not suffer what the people in their villages are passing through. They should go to their villages, let the terrorists come and lets see what will happen. Let’s see if they can defend themselves.

Daerefama Anabraba – Legal Practitioner.  For me, what we should ask ourselves is, prior before now the emergency rule has been on, what effect has it created and why should we extend it? That is what we should think about. And I think if the thing is not working out we should find any other means of solving the problems of the northerners and not by always extending the emergency rule.
Let us see the state of emergency from the perspective of the senators from the affected states. Although Goodluck Jonathan is our brother but let us see it from those legislators perspective. How far, how well has it gone? So I think for now let the president look for a better panacea than always extending the emergence.
I think the involvement of foreign nationals in the fight against Boko Haram is a good development. So I think government should go for that one instead of extending the emergency rule. There shouldn’t be any extension for now.

Continue Reading

Opinion

Kudos  Gov Fubara

Published

on

Please permit me to use this medium to appreciate our able governor, Siminalayi Fubara for the inauguration of the 14.2-kilometre Obodhi–Ozochi Road in Ahoada-East Local Government Area.  This inauguration marks a significant milestone in the history of our communities and deserves commendation. We, the people of Ozochi, are particularly happy because this project has brought long-awaited relief after years of isolation and hardship.
The expression of our traditional ruler, His Royal Highness, Eze Prince Ike Ehie, JP, during the inauguration captured the joy of our people.  He said, “our isolation is over.”  That reflects the profound impact of this road on daily life, economic activities, and social integration of the people of Ozochi and other neighbouring communities. The road will no doubt ease transportation, improve access to markets and healthcare, and strengthen links between Ahoada, Omoku, and other parts of Rivers State.
The people of Ahoada, Omoku, and indeed Rivers State as a whole are grateful to our dear governor for this laudable achievement and wish him many more successful years in office. We pray that God endows him with more wisdom and strength to continue to pilot the affairs of the state for the benefit of all. As citizens, we should rally behind the governor and support his development agenda. Our politicians and stakeholders should embrace peace and cooperation, as no meaningful progress can be achieved in an atmosphere of conflict. Sustainable development in the state can only thrive where peace prevails.
Samuel Ebiye
Continue Reading

Opinion

… And It Came To Pass

Published

on

Quote:“Leadership is not measured by how hard one strikes back, but by how steady one remains under provocation.”
Tell it  in Rivers State, publish it  in the streets of Port Harcourt, so  the daughters of the State could rejoice, and the daughters of the uncircumcised triumph and know that Fubara is not vindictive”. And it came to pass that Rivers State emerged from one of the most delicate chapters in its political journey, the period of emergency rule that spanned from March 18 to September 18, 2025. It was a season that tested institutions, strained loyalties, and exposed the fragile balance between power and principle. During that time, the suspended Governor, Sir Siminalayi Fubara DSSRS, was widely believed to have suffered not only political setbacks but personal betrayal, allegedly from some top civil servants within the state apparatus. These were individuals expected to uphold neutrality and professionalism, yet were accused in public opinion of taking sides against the very government they served.
As the emergency rule ended and Governor Fubara resumed office, expectations were shaped less by policy and more by emotion. Many assumed that revenge would quietly find expression through governance. The loudest suspicion centered on the 2025 Christmas bonus of ?100,000 traditionally paid to each worker. The thinking was simple and cynical: a wounded governor would surely withhold goodwill. Some voices even mocked workers  openly hoping that the governor would refuse to pay the bonus. To them, denial of the bonus would serve as proof of political strength and justified retaliation. In reality, such thinking revealed a troubling desire to see governance reduced to personal vendetta. Yet,  it came to pass, the governor chose a path that confounded suspicion. Against all expectations, the 2025 Christmas bonus was paid.
That single decision quietly but firmly reframed the narrative. It showed a leader focused on governance rather than grudges, on institutional continuity rather than emotional satisfaction. The payment was not a favor, nor was it a concession; it was a statement that public administration must rise above personal injury. By honoring the bonus, Governor Fubara demonstrated that leadership is not measured by how hard one strikes back, but by how steady one remains under provocation. He made it clear that workers’ welfare would not become collateral damage in political disagreements. This action also served as a moral rebuke to those who celebrated division and hoped for punishment. Governance is not validated by the suffering of workers, nor is leadership strengthened by withholding entitlements. At the same time, the issue of alleged sycophancy and betrayal within the civil service cannot be brushed aside. If proven, such conduct deserves firm, lawful, and institutional correction. Civil servants are bound by duty to the state, not to political conspiracies or shifting loyalties.
However, justice must never be confused with revenge. The strength of governance lies in correcting wrongs without destroying the system itself. Governor Fubara’s restraint suggested an understanding that the future of Rivers State mattered more than settling scores. For workers, this moment carried an important lesson. Celebration should be rooted in good governance, not in the expectation of another’s downfall. Rejoicing in rumors of denial or punishment undermines the very stability that protects workers’ welfare. Public service thrives where professionalism, mutual respect, and accountability are upheld. Pettiness, gossip, and political scheming only weaken institutions and erode trust. History often remembers leaders not for the crises they inherit, but for the character they display in response. In paying the 2025 Christmas bonus, Governor Fubara chose legacy over impulse, maturity over malice.
And so, it came to pass that focus defeated revenge, governance triumphed over bitterness, and Rivers State was reminded that true leadership is proven when restraint is expected least but delivered most. Beyond the symbolism of the Christmas bonus lies a deeper question about the kind of political culture Rivers State intends to cultivate in the years ahead. Periods of emergency rule, anywhere in the world, often leave behind residues of suspicion, fear, and silent realignments. Institutions do not emerge untouched; individuals recalibrate loyalties, some out of conviction, others out of self-preservation. What distinguishes stable democracies from fragile ones is not the absence of such moments, but the discipline with which leadership manages their aftermath. River.
King Onunwor
Continue Reading

Opinion

That Withdrawal of Police   Orderlies  From VIPs

Published

on

Quote:”Balancing VIP security with public safety remains a tightrope walk in a country where the majority of citizens are still under-protected.”
The Presidential announcement on the removal of police orderlies from persons in authority and their relations  ( Very Important Persons ) last month came as a relief to many Nigerians who felt deprived    of one major  role of government ; security of lives and property.The higher  population of Nigerians  missed needed security because the VIPs and the VVIPs kept  retinue of Police Officers  totalling over 100 ,000 to  themselves and their family members as if they are all that matter  while some  communities under attack of terrorists  have no single unit of  police station located there in. While many hailed the announcement , some said perhaps the government has just woken up to her major responsibility of securing the lives and property of all  citizens while many expressed indifference on the note that it may be one of those pronouncements which come only in words but no action .Many keep their fingers crossed watching how it will play out , how Mr President  will  go about the implementation of the seemingly dicey  policy .
Benjamin Franklin  said “well said is better than well done ”  It is sufficient today to say that many Nigerians including me are still waiting and watching to see  how well  and how long this  return  of the Police service to the ordinary people will go . Wishing hopes will not be crashed ,  It  is note worthy, that  the recent complaints by the VIPs of being exposed to attacks  may in a way affect the action on implementation. Recently, at Senate plenary , another worrisome  angle came up as Senator Abdul Ningi  coming through a motion    disclosed that he had only one police officer attached to him ( his office ) and that  the officer was recalled the week before following  Mr President’s directive  . Senator Ningi said the withdrawal exposed him to high risks but underscored the angle that while his orderly  was recalled , many other politicians , men  and women in authority, business concerns   foreigners  and even children of some  VIPs are still enjoying retinue of police protection ( officially attached to them ).
 It’s note  worthy also that the Deputy Senate President , Distinguished Senator Jibrin Barau,  who presided  over  the session revealed that the  leadership of both chambers are already in discussion with President Tinubu on the need  to exempt  the law makers  from the new policy .  Senator Ningi may not be  wrong . After all he emphasized he is okay  provided that the removal of the Police Orderlies be done across board . Senator Barau noted that talks are on  over the issue of law makers’    in line with international practice . Further details from the Presidency  noted  that   Presiding officers  will retain their  police officers ,  others would have Civil Defense  officers ( NSCDC) as orderlies while  any other VIP who feels he or she deserves personal police protection should get clearance from  his office . In the midst of all  issues weighing in on the proper implementation , it becomes necessary  to bear in mind that  the decision  hinges on  the realization that Nigeria has peculiar security issues (of kidnappings, banditry, and terrorism.) and that  majority of Nigerians   are under protected.
More so, that if well  implemented, Police officers will focus on core duties; even as 30,000 new police officers are to  recruited to enhance security .That implementation  must be made in a  way that leaves no room.for selective  treatment loss of confidence  and  controversies.  Looking at previous attempts of  implementation  of this policy  gives faint hope  as several  attempts consistently failed . Former  IGPs like Tafa Balogun (2003), Ogbonnaya Onovo (2009), and Ibrahim Idris (2018) tried  the policy but all  failed due to political resistance from various angles. All the failed attempts  were tied to lack of political will  mostly due to the fact that the directives came from police chiefs, not the president. Selective Enforcement was another killer to the policy  as  partial implementation  met  resistance   and   later  reversal . Egbetokun (2023) and Adamu (2020) saw minimal impact.
Further more entrenched corruption in the system saw  Politicians and VIPs quietly regain police escorts due to ‘transactional economics”and pressure. Worse still the mindset of the  police officers  withdrawn didn’t help the policy Underpaid police prioritize VIP duties for extra benefits. Many wish President Tinubu’s move can  break this cycle.  As at today, he  still  insists the move is non-negotiable while stressing collaboration with states to upgrade training facilities. As citizens look forward to  success of the policy  without undue exposure of both sides, balancing VIP security with public safety remains a tightrope walk. Talk fades ; action echoes.  How the Presidency  implements this policy.  has  much to tell on the governments stand on national / community  security , choice of priority and the ability to   stand uncomprised . The known  goal is clear:  The outcome is  not yet certain.  Fingers crossed , we await . Definitely , time will tell.
By: Nneka Amaechi-Nnadi.
s State stood at such a crossroads in September 2025. The temptation to rule with a long memory and a heavy hand was real. Yet, the choice made signaled a preference for healing over hardening. Leadership after crisis demands more than administrative competence; it requires moral clarity.
 Governor Fubara’s decision reminded the state that authority is not best exercised through silent punishment or selective generosity. Rather, it is strengthened when rules remain rules, irrespective of personal injury. By keeping faith with workers, the government preserved an essential firewall between politics and public service. That firewall, once breached, turns governance into a battlefield where livelihoods become weapons. Rivers State narrowly avoided that descent. In doing so, it affirmed that institutions must outlive tempers, and governance must not mirror the bitterness of political seasons. This moment also invites sober introspection within the civil service itself. Allegations of partisanship, if left unresolved, corrode professionalism and weaken public confidence. A civil service that drifts into political camps loses its moral authority and operational effectiveness.
Therefore, reform, where necessary, should be guided by due process, transparency, and institutional review—not whispers, witch-hunts, or mob verdicts. Accountability strengthens systems when it is fair; it destroys them when it is arbitrary. The restraint shown by the executive places a corresponding burden on administrative leadership to restore discipline, neutrality, and pride in public service. For the wider political class and the commentariat, the episode serves as a caution against normalizing cruelty as strategy. The eagerness with which some anticipated workers’ suffering revealed a dangerous appetite for scorched-earth politics. When governance becomes a spectator sport where pain is cheered and deprivation is weaponized, society inches toward moral exhaustion. Rivers State has seen enough turbulence to know that stability is not sustained by triumphalism, but by restraint.
The lesson is simple yet profound: power is fleeting, but institutions endure; leaders pass, but precedents remain. In the end, the payment of the 2025 Christmas bonus was more than a fiscal act—it was a civic statement. It told workers they were not expendable. It told political actors that revenge would not be policy. And it told the state that maturity in leadership is not weakness, but strength under control. In a climate where many expected fire, restraint prevailed; where bitterness was predicted, balance emerged. Thus, Rivers State was offered a rare reminder that governance, at its best, is an act of discipline, and leadership, at its highest, is the courage to rise above provocation.
Continue Reading

Trending