Politics
Speaker, Members Differ On Investment Bill
The Speaker of the Rivers
State House of Assembly, Rt. Hon. Otelemaba Dan Amachree has committed the Garden City Private Equity Investment Bill into committee stage, even as lawmakers kicked that the bill should be step down due to duplication with other agencies.
The bill which was in its second reading was kicked against by majority members of the House with the view that Rivers State Micro Finance and Investment Corporation and Ministry of Finance and Corporations are saddled with the same work and responsibilities to create wealth and enhance the financial capacity of the state.
During the deliberation on the bill, Wednesday, members kicked against the establishment of a new agency, saying the state should use the existing agencies to invest and create wealth for the state.
Hon Chioma Golden Ngozi representing Etche Constituency II who said the bill appeared to be good and intended to create job and wealth for the people of the state, however, noted that the state can do without it since there are other agencies saddled with such responsibilities.
The lawmaker said, even though the bill was also intended to create equity in the investment of the state, the Ministry of Finance can do much more by creating wealth and also make judicious use of the funds appropriated to the ministry.
He disclosed that during the screening of members of the Board of the State Internal Revenue Service, it was found that the state had various investments in some companies operating in the state, regretting that the state had refused to utilize that opportunity adequately.
He appealed to the executive arm of government to use the existing agencies for the investment instead of establishing a fresh one, saying a new agency would amount to duplication and as well increase the wage bill of the state government.
He also urged the executive to use other investments agencies in the state like the Rivers State Sustainable Development Agency (RSSDA) to create wealth and empowerment for the state.
Other members who opposed the bill include Hon Anabraba Fredrick (Akuku-Toru 11), Hon Legborsi Nwidadah (Khana 1), Hon Victoria Nyeche (Port Harcourt 1), Hon Ibiso Wuche (Ahoada East II), Hon Miller Andrew Anderson (Opobo/Nkoro) and Hon Gift Wokacha (ONELGA).
But the Deputy Speaker, Hon Leyii Kwanee, representing Khana II reminded the House on rule 46, which stated that all bills shall receive third reading.
The Speaker, Rt Hon Amachree, however, referred members to House rule 45, section 5 and committed the bill to a committee stage for a public hearing. The Speaker set up an adhoc committee headed by Hon Horsfall Godstime Ben, representing Asaru Toru II, while Hon Okechukwu Akara Nwogu (Oyigbo), Hon. Lucky Odili (ONELGA II) and Hon Chigbo Sam Eliwe serve as members.
The committee is expected to conduct public hearing on the bill and report back to the House within one week.
Politics
2027: Bayelsa APC Adopts Tinubu As Sole Candidate … As Lokpobiri, Lyon Shun Meeting
Politics
Alleged Smear Campaign Against Yakubu, CSOs Demand Apology From Uzodimma

During a press conference held in Owerri, the coalition called the campaign a “dangerous and shameful display” designed to distract the public from the governor’s performance in office.
The CSOs directly linked the Greater Imo Initiative (GII) —the group that made the allegations on September 4, 2025—to Governor Uzodimma, describing the group as his “mouthpiece and attack dog.”
“Every word spoken against INEC was spoken on his behalf.
“By falsely alleging that Professor Yakubu has an alliance with Dr. Amadi to compromise the 2027 elections, Uzodimma has not only maligned a man of proven integrity but also assaulted the very foundation of our democracy”, said Dr Agbo Frederick, speaking for the coalition.
The coalition described Professor Yakubu as a “beacon of electoral professionalism” and called the attempt to soil his reputation “defamatory and a national security risk.”
They also defended Dr. Amadi, a “respected development scholar,” stating that the governor’s accusations were “laughable, desperate, and dangerous.”
The CSOs see the motive behind the campaign as an attempt to “silence the dissent, intimidate the opposition, and divert attention from the governor’s abysmal record in office.”
The coalition issued four key demands to Governor Uzodimma: An immediate retraction of the false and defamatory allegations against Professor Mahmood Yakubu and Dr. Chima Amadi.
- A public apology to both men within seven days, to be published in at least three national newspapers and broadcast on major television networks.
- An end to diversionary tactics and proxy propaganda.
- A renewed focus on governance, including addressing insecurity, unemployment, and poverty in Imo State.
The CSOs warned that failure to comply would force them to “review our position with a view to seeking legal redress from Governor Uzodimma for defamation, false accusation, and reckless endangerment of lives.”
“Governor Uzodimma must be reminded that he did not find himself in the seat of power to chase shadows.
“We call on all Nigerians to reject Uzodimma’s diversionary antics as they are nothing short of desperate plots by a government terrified of accountability”, the statement concluded.
Politics
Stopping Natasha’s Resumption Threatens Nigeria’s Democracy – ADC
In a statement signed by its National Publicity Secretary, Mallam Bolaji Abdullahi, the ADC expressed concern that preventing the senator from resuming her legislative duties violates democratic principles and disenfranchises her constituents.
“The suspension, having been imposed by the Senate and not a court of law, has lapsed. Any further attempt to prevent her from resuming is therefore both illegal and morally indefensible,” Mallam Abdullahi said.
The party noted that denying Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan access to the chamber silences the voice of the people who elected her, adding that the withdrawal of her salary, aides, and office access during the suspension amounted to excessive punishment.
The ADC also criticised the Clerk of the National Assembly for declining to process her resumption on grounds that the matter was before the courts, arguing that the Clerk’s role was administrative, not judicial.
“Administrative caution must not translate into complicity. When the administrative machinery becomes hostage to political interests, the institution itself is diminished,” the party stated.
Highlighting that Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan is one of only four women in the 109-member Senate, the ADC warned that the handling of the case sends a discouraging signal about gender inclusion in Nigerian politics.
“Any action that resembles gender intimidation of the few women in the Senate would only discourage women’s participation. Nigeria cannot claim to be a democracy while excluding half of its population from key decision-making spaces,” Mallam Abdullahi added.
The ADC insisted that Sen. Akpoti-Uduaghan be allowed to resume her seat immediately, stressing that the matter was about more than one individual.
“What is at stake here is not just one Senate seat, but the integrity of our democracy itself,” the party said.